法医精神病院住院隔离和约束的相关因素:一项10年回顾性研究

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328164
Elke Ham, Soyeon Kim, N Zoe Hilton
{"title":"法医精神病院住院隔离和约束的相关因素:一项10年回顾性研究","authors":"Elke Ham, Soyeon Kim, N Zoe Hilton","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of coercive measures such as seclusion and restraint in forensic mental healthcare settings is widespread but controversial. Efforts to reduce these measures require knowledge of patient-related risk factors. The present study aimed to identify and confirm factors related to seclusion and restraint that can be assessed upon admission among men and women admitted to forensic hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We included cross-sectional Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for adult patients admitted to 10 forensic psychiatric hospitals between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2023. We determined patient demographic, administrative, and clinical characteristics associated with seclusion and physical and manual restraint episodes during the first three days of admission. We conducted logistic Generalized Linear mixed Models (GLMM) to examine the association between the independent variables and restraint and seclusion while accounting for variability across facilities. Of 7635 patients, 30.2% (n = 2302) were secluded, and 3.7% (n = 286) were restrained within their first three days of admission. Secluded patients were more likely to be young adults, male, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Being admitted due to fitness-related reasons, lack of insight, medication non-adherence, higher scores on the mania scale and cognitive impairment further contributed to the higher odds of being secluded, whereas neurocognitive disorder diagnosis and elopement behavior were protective factors. Restrained patients were also more likely to be young adults, have a diagnosis of mood or anxiety, neurodevelopmental or personality disorder, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Fitness-related status, medication non-adherence, and cognitive impairment further contributed to this model of restraint. Indigenous self-identification and immigration status were not significant contributors to either model. Clinicians can assess indicators associated with seclusion and restraint when forensic patients are admitted to forensic hospitals or during the first three days of their stay, enabling effective targeting of those needs to reduce the use of coercive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Elke Ham, Soyeon Kim, N Zoe Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0328164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of coercive measures such as seclusion and restraint in forensic mental healthcare settings is widespread but controversial. Efforts to reduce these measures require knowledge of patient-related risk factors. The present study aimed to identify and confirm factors related to seclusion and restraint that can be assessed upon admission among men and women admitted to forensic hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We included cross-sectional Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for adult patients admitted to 10 forensic psychiatric hospitals between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2023. We determined patient demographic, administrative, and clinical characteristics associated with seclusion and physical and manual restraint episodes during the first three days of admission. We conducted logistic Generalized Linear mixed Models (GLMM) to examine the association between the independent variables and restraint and seclusion while accounting for variability across facilities. Of 7635 patients, 30.2% (n = 2302) were secluded, and 3.7% (n = 286) were restrained within their first three days of admission. Secluded patients were more likely to be young adults, male, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Being admitted due to fitness-related reasons, lack of insight, medication non-adherence, higher scores on the mania scale and cognitive impairment further contributed to the higher odds of being secluded, whereas neurocognitive disorder diagnosis and elopement behavior were protective factors. Restrained patients were also more likely to be young adults, have a diagnosis of mood or anxiety, neurodevelopmental or personality disorder, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Fitness-related status, medication non-adherence, and cognitive impairment further contributed to this model of restraint. Indigenous self-identification and immigration status were not significant contributors to either model. Clinicians can assess indicators associated with seclusion and restraint when forensic patients are admitted to forensic hospitals or during the first three days of their stay, enabling effective targeting of those needs to reduce the use of coercive measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0328164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法医精神保健机构中普遍使用隔离和约束等强制措施,但存在争议。努力减少这些措施需要了解与患者相关的风险因素。本研究旨在确定和确认与隔离和约束有关的因素,这些因素可在加拿大安大略省法医医院收治的男性和女性入院时进行评估。我们纳入了2013年4月1日至2023年3月31日期间在10家法医精神病院住院的成年患者的安大略省心理健康报告系统的横断面入院数据。我们确定了入院前三天与隔离、身体和人工约束事件相关的患者人口统计学、行政管理和临床特征。我们使用logistic广义线性混合模型(GLMM)来检验自变量与约束和隔离之间的关联,同时考虑到设施之间的可变性。在7635例患者中,30.2% (n = 2302)被隔离,3.7% (n = 286)在入院前3天内被限制。被隔离的患者更可能是年轻人,男性,并且在暴力和攻击措施上得分更高。由于健康相关原因、缺乏洞察力、药物依从性、躁狂量表得分较高和认知障碍而入院的患者被隔离的几率更高,而神经认知障碍诊断和私奔行为是保护因素。克制型患者也更有可能是年轻人,被诊断为情绪或焦虑、神经发育或人格障碍,在暴力和攻击测试中得分更高。与健康相关的状态,药物依从性和认知障碍进一步促成了这种约束模式。土著自我认同和移民身份对这两种模式都没有显著影响。临床医生可在法医病人被送入法医医院或住院的头三天内评估与隔离和限制有关的指标,从而有效地满足这些需求,减少使用强制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.

Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.

Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.

Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.

The use of coercive measures such as seclusion and restraint in forensic mental healthcare settings is widespread but controversial. Efforts to reduce these measures require knowledge of patient-related risk factors. The present study aimed to identify and confirm factors related to seclusion and restraint that can be assessed upon admission among men and women admitted to forensic hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We included cross-sectional Ontario Mental Health Reporting System admission data for adult patients admitted to 10 forensic psychiatric hospitals between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2023. We determined patient demographic, administrative, and clinical characteristics associated with seclusion and physical and manual restraint episodes during the first three days of admission. We conducted logistic Generalized Linear mixed Models (GLMM) to examine the association between the independent variables and restraint and seclusion while accounting for variability across facilities. Of 7635 patients, 30.2% (n = 2302) were secluded, and 3.7% (n = 286) were restrained within their first three days of admission. Secluded patients were more likely to be young adults, male, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Being admitted due to fitness-related reasons, lack of insight, medication non-adherence, higher scores on the mania scale and cognitive impairment further contributed to the higher odds of being secluded, whereas neurocognitive disorder diagnosis and elopement behavior were protective factors. Restrained patients were also more likely to be young adults, have a diagnosis of mood or anxiety, neurodevelopmental or personality disorder, and scored higher on violence and aggression measures. Fitness-related status, medication non-adherence, and cognitive impairment further contributed to this model of restraint. Indigenous self-identification and immigration status were not significant contributors to either model. Clinicians can assess indicators associated with seclusion and restraint when forensic patients are admitted to forensic hospitals or during the first three days of their stay, enabling effective targeting of those needs to reduce the use of coercive measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信