Jennifer Dotta-Celio, Mélanie Lelubre, Sabrina Bolzon, Georges Halabi, Michel Burnier, Patrick Bodenmann, Menno Pruijm, Marie P Schneider
{"title":"根据透析单位有无移民背景的药物依从性和感知(DIANA定性研究)。","authors":"Jennifer Dotta-Celio, Mélanie Lelubre, Sabrina Bolzon, Georges Halabi, Michel Burnier, Patrick Bodenmann, Menno Pruijm, Marie P Schneider","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Migration status has received little attention in the context of medication adherence. This qualitative study aims to consolidate the findings of the quantitative DIANA study by: 1) exploring medication management, medication knowledge and perceptions and 2) identifying whether there are differences in medication management, knowledge and perceptions between patients according to the patients' migration status.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This monocentric qualitative study was part of the research protocol DIANA (<i>Dialyse chronique et adhésion thérapeutique</i>). Patients were recruited at the chronic dialysis unit of the Lausanne University Hospital. In-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted; for allophone patients, an interpreter was present. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were performed. Nine patients were Swiss, 3 had a residence/settlement permit, 6 were provisionally admitted/asylum seekers. Six interviews were performed with an interpreter. Core themes were: (1) treatment management (medication intake had become a habit, forgetting was rare), (2) heterogeneous treatment knowledge but highly perceived necessity, (3) reported medication disadvantages were pill burden and side effects, (4) role of the patient in the medical environment (trust in physicians but patients making decisions regarding their treatment on their own, without consulting healthcare professionals). Swiss patients engaged more in shared decision-making and were more likely to talk about side effects than migrant patients. Provisionally admitted foreign nationals/asylum seekers talked more about their gratitude to the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More studies are needed to understand how shared decision-making can be established between health professionals and patients, taking into account their migration status. To provide tailored education, it is essential to evaluate patients' health literacy and to use the teach-back method to find the best way to convey health messages. The acquisition of transcultural clinical skills by health professionals is necessary to support medication adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2107-2118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Adherence and Perceptions According to the Presence or Absence of a Migration Background in a Dialysis Unit (DIANA Qualitative Study).\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Dotta-Celio, Mélanie Lelubre, Sabrina Bolzon, Georges Halabi, Michel Burnier, Patrick Bodenmann, Menno Pruijm, Marie P Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S503025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Migration status has received little attention in the context of medication adherence. This qualitative study aims to consolidate the findings of the quantitative DIANA study by: 1) exploring medication management, medication knowledge and perceptions and 2) identifying whether there are differences in medication management, knowledge and perceptions between patients according to the patients' migration status.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This monocentric qualitative study was part of the research protocol DIANA (<i>Dialyse chronique et adhésion thérapeutique</i>). Patients were recruited at the chronic dialysis unit of the Lausanne University Hospital. In-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted; for allophone patients, an interpreter was present. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were performed. Nine patients were Swiss, 3 had a residence/settlement permit, 6 were provisionally admitted/asylum seekers. Six interviews were performed with an interpreter. Core themes were: (1) treatment management (medication intake had become a habit, forgetting was rare), (2) heterogeneous treatment knowledge but highly perceived necessity, (3) reported medication disadvantages were pill burden and side effects, (4) role of the patient in the medical environment (trust in physicians but patients making decisions regarding their treatment on their own, without consulting healthcare professionals). Swiss patients engaged more in shared decision-making and were more likely to talk about side effects than migrant patients. Provisionally admitted foreign nationals/asylum seekers talked more about their gratitude to the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More studies are needed to understand how shared decision-making can be established between health professionals and patients, taking into account their migration status. To provide tailored education, it is essential to evaluate patients' health literacy and to use the teach-back method to find the best way to convey health messages. The acquisition of transcultural clinical skills by health professionals is necessary to support medication adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2107-2118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在药物依从性的背景下,移民状况很少受到关注。本定性研究旨在巩固定量DIANA研究的结果:1)探索药物管理、药物知识和认知;2)根据患者的迁移身份,确定患者在药物管理、知识和认知方面是否存在差异。患者和方法:本单中心定性研究是研究方案DIANA (Dialyse chronique et adhsm - acei)的一部分。患者是在洛桑大学医院慢性透析病房招募的。进行了深入的面对面访谈;对于异音患者,有一名翻译在场。每次采访都被逐字记录下来。进行了内容分析。结果:共进行了18次访谈。9名病人是瑞士人,3名有居留/定居许可证,6名是临时入境/寻求庇护者。在一名翻译的陪同下进行了六次采访。核心主题是:(1)治疗管理(服药已成为一种习惯,很少遗忘),(2)异质性治疗知识但高度感知的必要性,(3)报告的药物缺点是药丸负担和副作用,(4)患者在医疗环境中的角色(信任医生,但患者自行决定治疗,而不咨询医疗保健专业人员)。与移民患者相比,瑞士患者更多地参与共同决策,更有可能谈论副作用。临时入境的外国人/寻求庇护者更多地谈到了他们对医疗保健系统的感激之情。结论:需要更多的研究来了解如何在考虑其移民身份的情况下,在卫生专业人员和患者之间建立共同决策。为了提供量身定制的教育,必须评估患者的健康素养,并使用反导方法找到传达健康信息的最佳方式。卫生专业人员获得跨文化临床技能对于支持药物依从性是必要的。
Medication Adherence and Perceptions According to the Presence or Absence of a Migration Background in a Dialysis Unit (DIANA Qualitative Study).
Purpose: Migration status has received little attention in the context of medication adherence. This qualitative study aims to consolidate the findings of the quantitative DIANA study by: 1) exploring medication management, medication knowledge and perceptions and 2) identifying whether there are differences in medication management, knowledge and perceptions between patients according to the patients' migration status.
Patients and methods: This monocentric qualitative study was part of the research protocol DIANA (Dialyse chronique et adhésion thérapeutique). Patients were recruited at the chronic dialysis unit of the Lausanne University Hospital. In-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted; for allophone patients, an interpreter was present. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis was performed.
Results: Eighteen interviews were performed. Nine patients were Swiss, 3 had a residence/settlement permit, 6 were provisionally admitted/asylum seekers. Six interviews were performed with an interpreter. Core themes were: (1) treatment management (medication intake had become a habit, forgetting was rare), (2) heterogeneous treatment knowledge but highly perceived necessity, (3) reported medication disadvantages were pill burden and side effects, (4) role of the patient in the medical environment (trust in physicians but patients making decisions regarding their treatment on their own, without consulting healthcare professionals). Swiss patients engaged more in shared decision-making and were more likely to talk about side effects than migrant patients. Provisionally admitted foreign nationals/asylum seekers talked more about their gratitude to the healthcare system.
Conclusion: More studies are needed to understand how shared decision-making can be established between health professionals and patients, taking into account their migration status. To provide tailored education, it is essential to evaluate patients' health literacy and to use the teach-back method to find the best way to convey health messages. The acquisition of transcultural clinical skills by health professionals is necessary to support medication adherence.
期刊介绍:
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.