基于深度学习的骨骼成熟度评估:五种手-手腕方法的比较分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Serhat Tentaş, Samet Özden
{"title":"基于深度学习的骨骼成熟度评估:五种手-手腕方法的比较分析。","authors":"Serhat Tentaş, Samet Özden","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms in skeletal age estimation by comparing the diagnostic reliability of five different hand-wrist maturation (HWM) assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 6572 hand-wrist radiographs from orthodontic patients aged 8-16 years were retrospectively analysed. Radiographs were categorised into five groups based on HWM classification methods: (I) Björk's nine-stage, (II) Hägg and Taranger's five-stage, (III) Chapman's four-stage, (IV) three-stage hook of hamate ossification based and (V) simplified three-stage Björk's classification based. YOLOv8x-based deep learning models were trained separately for each group. The dataset was split into training, validation and test subsets. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The YOLOv8x-cls model demonstrated high classification performance across all five groups. Group IV and Group II achieved the highest accuracy and F1 scores, with average F1 values of 0.99 and 0.96, respectively. Group III and Group V also showed strong performance (F1 = 0.93 and 0.92). In Group I, slightly lower classification performance was observed in the S-H2 and MP3-Cap stages (F1 = 0.72-0.74), which correspond to the pubertal growth peak, while early and late skeletal maturation stages were classified with high accuracy and F1 scores. ROC curve analysis further supported these findings, with AUC values for MP3-Cap and S-H2 recorded as 0.70 and 0.75, respectively, whereas higher AUC values were achieved in most other stages across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models proved effective in evaluating skeletal maturation across five different HWM methods. Particularly high performance was observed in anatomically distinct regions such as the MP3, adductor sesamoid and hamate bone, which can be reliably identified by general dentists, enabling earlier referrals and timely orthodontic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Based Evaluation of Skeletal Maturation: A Comparative Analysis of Five Hand-Wrist Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Serhat Tentaş, Samet Özden\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms in skeletal age estimation by comparing the diagnostic reliability of five different hand-wrist maturation (HWM) assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 6572 hand-wrist radiographs from orthodontic patients aged 8-16 years were retrospectively analysed. Radiographs were categorised into five groups based on HWM classification methods: (I) Björk's nine-stage, (II) Hägg and Taranger's five-stage, (III) Chapman's four-stage, (IV) three-stage hook of hamate ossification based and (V) simplified three-stage Björk's classification based. YOLOv8x-based deep learning models were trained separately for each group. The dataset was split into training, validation and test subsets. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The YOLOv8x-cls model demonstrated high classification performance across all five groups. Group IV and Group II achieved the highest accuracy and F1 scores, with average F1 values of 0.99 and 0.96, respectively. Group III and Group V also showed strong performance (F1 = 0.93 and 0.92). In Group I, slightly lower classification performance was observed in the S-H2 and MP3-Cap stages (F1 = 0.72-0.74), which correspond to the pubertal growth peak, while early and late skeletal maturation stages were classified with high accuracy and F1 scores. ROC curve analysis further supported these findings, with AUC values for MP3-Cap and S-H2 recorded as 0.70 and 0.75, respectively, whereas higher AUC values were achieved in most other stages across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models proved effective in evaluating skeletal maturation across five different HWM methods. Particularly high performance was observed in anatomically distinct regions such as the MP3, adductor sesamoid and hamate bone, which can be reliably identified by general dentists, enabling earlier referrals and timely orthodontic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较五种不同的腕成熟度(HWM)评估方法的诊断可靠性,评估深度学习算法在骨骼年龄估计中的有效性。材料与方法:回顾性分析8 ~ 16岁正畸患者手部腕关节x线片6572张。根据HWM分类方法将x线片分为五组:(I) Björk的九阶段,(II) Hägg和Taranger的五阶段,(III) Chapman的四阶段,(IV)基于钩骨骨化的三阶段和(V)简化的三阶段Björk的分类。每组分别训练基于yolov8x的深度学习模型。数据集被分为训练、验证和测试子集。使用准确性、精密度、召回率、F1分数和AUC指标对性能进行评估。结果:YOLOv8x-cls模型在所有五组中均表现出较高的分类性能。组IV和组II的准确率和F1得分最高,F1平均值分别为0.99和0.96。III组和V组的表现也很好(F1 = 0.93和0.92)。第1组在S-H2和MP3-Cap阶段的分类性能略低(F1 = 0.72-0.74),对应于青春期生长高峰,而早期和晚期骨骼成熟阶段的分类精度较高,F1得分较高。ROC曲线分析进一步支持了这些发现,MP3-Cap和S-H2的AUC值分别为0.70和0.75,而所有组中大多数其他阶段的AUC值都较高。结论:深度学习模型在五种不同的HWM方法中被证明是有效的。在解剖学上不同的区域,如MP3、芝麻状内收肌和钩骨,观察到特别高的性能,这些区域可以由普通牙医可靠地识别,从而实现早期转诊和及时的正畸干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Based Evaluation of Skeletal Maturation: A Comparative Analysis of Five Hand-Wrist Methods.

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning algorithms in skeletal age estimation by comparing the diagnostic reliability of five different hand-wrist maturation (HWM) assessment methods.

Materials and methods: A total of 6572 hand-wrist radiographs from orthodontic patients aged 8-16 years were retrospectively analysed. Radiographs were categorised into five groups based on HWM classification methods: (I) Björk's nine-stage, (II) Hägg and Taranger's five-stage, (III) Chapman's four-stage, (IV) three-stage hook of hamate ossification based and (V) simplified three-stage Björk's classification based. YOLOv8x-based deep learning models were trained separately for each group. The dataset was split into training, validation and test subsets. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC metrics.

Results: The YOLOv8x-cls model demonstrated high classification performance across all five groups. Group IV and Group II achieved the highest accuracy and F1 scores, with average F1 values of 0.99 and 0.96, respectively. Group III and Group V also showed strong performance (F1 = 0.93 and 0.92). In Group I, slightly lower classification performance was observed in the S-H2 and MP3-Cap stages (F1 = 0.72-0.74), which correspond to the pubertal growth peak, while early and late skeletal maturation stages were classified with high accuracy and F1 scores. ROC curve analysis further supported these findings, with AUC values for MP3-Cap and S-H2 recorded as 0.70 and 0.75, respectively, whereas higher AUC values were achieved in most other stages across all groups.

Conclusion: Deep learning models proved effective in evaluating skeletal maturation across five different HWM methods. Particularly high performance was observed in anatomically distinct regions such as the MP3, adductor sesamoid and hamate bone, which can be reliably identified by general dentists, enabling earlier referrals and timely orthodontic interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信