Yuki Kumakawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takahiro Mori, Koji Mori
{"title":"高层管理人员参与、职业健康专业人员参与管理评审与工作场所健康促进计划结果之间的关系：一项横断面研究","authors":"Yuki Kumakawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takahiro Mori, Koji Mori","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined whether management-level discussions on Health and Productivity Management (HPM) and the involvement of occupational health professionals in discussions are associated with workplace health promotion (WHP) program outcomes, as indicated by HPM evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 2,495 corporations that submitted the 2020 HPM Survey Sheets. Corporations were categorized into three groups based on the presence or absence of HPM discussions at management-level meetings and the attendance of occupational health professionals. The overall score and the deviation score for \"assessment and improvement\" were used as indicators of program outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were performed, adjusting for industry sector, company size, and number of occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corporations without HPM discussions at management-level meetings showed significantly lower scores on both indicators (the overall score: coefficient: -11.70, 95% CI: -12.83 to -10.53, \"assessment and improvement\": coefficient: -11.30, 95% CI: -12.50 to -9.97). In contrast, corporations with HPM discussions attended by occupational health professionals demonstrated significantly higher scores than those without such attendance (the overall score: coefficient: 5.39, 95% CI: 4.61 to 6.18, \"assessment and improvement\": coefficient: 5.15, 95% CI: 4.28 to 6.02). These associations remained significant after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that discussions on HPM at management-level meetings and the involvement of occupational health professionals are associated with WHP program outcomes. These results suggest that collaboration between top management and occupational health professionals in management reviews may contribute to the successful implementation of WHP programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between top management engagement, occupational health professional involvement in management reviews, and workplace health promotion program outcomes: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Kumakawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takahiro Mori, Koji Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined whether management-level discussions on Health and Productivity Management (HPM) and the involvement of occupational health professionals in discussions are associated with workplace health promotion (WHP) program outcomes, as indicated by HPM evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 2,495 corporations that submitted the 2020 HPM Survey Sheets. Corporations were categorized into three groups based on the presence or absence of HPM discussions at management-level meetings and the attendance of occupational health professionals. The overall score and the deviation score for \\\"assessment and improvement\\\" were used as indicators of program outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were performed, adjusting for industry sector, company size, and number of occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corporations without HPM discussions at management-level meetings showed significantly lower scores on both indicators (the overall score: coefficient: -11.70, 95% CI: -12.83 to -10.53, \\\"assessment and improvement\\\": coefficient: -11.30, 95% CI: -12.50 to -9.97). In contrast, corporations with HPM discussions attended by occupational health professionals demonstrated significantly higher scores than those without such attendance (the overall score: coefficient: 5.39, 95% CI: 4.61 to 6.18, \\\"assessment and improvement\\\": coefficient: 5.15, 95% CI: 4.28 to 6.02). These associations remained significant after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that discussions on HPM at management-level meetings and the involvement of occupational health professionals are associated with WHP program outcomes. These results suggest that collaboration between top management and occupational health professionals in management reviews may contribute to the successful implementation of WHP programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between top management engagement, occupational health professional involvement in management reviews, and workplace health promotion program outcomes: a cross-sectional study.
Objectives: This study examined whether management-level discussions on Health and Productivity Management (HPM) and the involvement of occupational health professionals in discussions are associated with workplace health promotion (WHP) program outcomes, as indicated by HPM evaluation.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 2,495 corporations that submitted the 2020 HPM Survey Sheets. Corporations were categorized into three groups based on the presence or absence of HPM discussions at management-level meetings and the attendance of occupational health professionals. The overall score and the deviation score for "assessment and improvement" were used as indicators of program outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were performed, adjusting for industry sector, company size, and number of occupational physicians and occupational health nurses.
Results: Corporations without HPM discussions at management-level meetings showed significantly lower scores on both indicators (the overall score: coefficient: -11.70, 95% CI: -12.83 to -10.53, "assessment and improvement": coefficient: -11.30, 95% CI: -12.50 to -9.97). In contrast, corporations with HPM discussions attended by occupational health professionals demonstrated significantly higher scores than those without such attendance (the overall score: coefficient: 5.39, 95% CI: 4.61 to 6.18, "assessment and improvement": coefficient: 5.15, 95% CI: 4.28 to 6.02). These associations remained significant after adjusting for covariates.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that discussions on HPM at management-level meetings and the involvement of occupational health professionals are associated with WHP program outcomes. These results suggest that collaboration between top management and occupational health professionals in management reviews may contribute to the successful implementation of WHP programs.
期刊介绍：
The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
