家庭营养安全量表(HNSS):进一步建立马萨诸塞州全州样本的效度和信度。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner
{"title":"家庭营养安全量表(HNSS):进一步建立马萨诸塞州全州样本的效度和信度。","authors":"Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS): Further Establishing Validity and Reliability in a Statewide Sample in Massachusetts.\",\"authors\":\"Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国最早用于评估营养安全的调查措施之一被称为家庭营养安全量表(HNSS)。虽然在原HNSS开发研究中进行的分析支持量表的效度和信度,但一些调查开发步骤超出了原研究的范围,如验证性因子分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA)和差异项目功能(Differential Item Functioning, DIF)。目的:对马萨诸塞州一个新的全州范围内的HNSS样本进行CFA和DIF分析。方法:从2022年11月至2023年1月,大波士顿食品银行(GBFB)和麻省总医院布里格姆(MGB)对马萨诸塞州成年人进行了全州代表性的横断面调查。除其他主题外,受访者还回答了有关社会人口统计学的问题并完成了HNSS。为了评估CFA模型的拟合,我们计算了Satorra-Bentler尺度卡方检验、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、标准化均方根残差(SRMR)和Bentler比较拟合指数(CFI)。计算Cronbach’s alpha来评估内部一致性。采用Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel程序调查不同人口统计学组间的DIF。结果:分析样本的参与者(n=2,903)大多数年龄在54岁以下(60.7%),女性(58.0%),非西班牙裔白人(71.3%),家庭收入低于75,000美元(71.1%)。CFA模型拟合指标完全在足够模型拟合的阈值内(卡方5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074), RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, CFI = 0.999)。Cronbach’s alpha为0.923。在年龄、种族/民族、性别、受教育程度、收入、家庭中是否有孩子或家庭规模的人群中,没有迹象表明这四个项目中的任何一个都有DIF。结论:这些发现进一步支持了HNSS的结构效度和信度,并进一步支持了该量表在不同社会人口统计学家庭样本中的研究和项目评估目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS): Further Establishing Validity and Reliability in a Statewide Sample in Massachusetts.

Background: One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).

Objective: To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.

Methods: From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.

Results: Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.

Conclusions: These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信