Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner
{"title":"家庭营养安全量表(HNSS):进一步建立马萨诸塞州全州样本的效度和信度。","authors":"Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS): Further Establishing Validity and Reliability in a Statewide Sample in Massachusetts.\",\"authors\":\"Eric E Calloway, Amy L Yaroch, Cara F Ruggerio, Meghan E Perkins, Christopher R Long, James Marriott, Allison J Wu, Man Luo, Kieley L Chapman, Anisha Gundewar, Daniel Taitelbaum, Lauren Fiechtner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS): Further Establishing Validity and Reliability in a Statewide Sample in Massachusetts.
Background: One of the first survey measures for assessing nutrition security in the U.S. is referred to as the Household Nutrition Security Scale (HNSS). While the analyses conducted in the original HNSS development study supported the validity and reliability of the scale, some survey development steps were beyond the scope of the original study, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).
Objective: To conduct CFA and DIF analyses on the HNSS within a new statewide sample in Massachusetts.
Methods: From November 2022-January 2023, the Greater Boston Food Bank (GBFB) and Mass General Brigham (MGB) conducted a cross-sectional, statewide, representative survey of Massachusetts adults. In addition to other topics, respondents answered questions about sociodemographics and completed the HNSS. To assess CFA model fit, the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-squared test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the Bentler Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were calculated. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to investigate DIF across demographic groups.
Results: Participants in the analytic sample (n=2,903) were mostly at or under age 54 (60.7%), women (58.0%), Non-Hispanic White (71.3%), and with household incomes below $75,000 (71.1%). CFA model fit metrics were well within thresholds for adequate model fit (Chi-square 5.213 (DF=2, p = 0.074) RMSEA = 0.024 (95% CI = 0.000 - 0.049), SRMR = 0.006, and CFI = 0.999). Cronbach's alpha was 0.923. There was no indication of DIF for any of the four items across groups for age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, income, having children in the household, or household size.
Conclusions: These findings further support construct validity and reliability of HNSS, and the further use of the scale for research and program evaluation purposes within sociodemographically diverse samples of households.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.