Petros I Tatsios, Eirini Grammatopoulou, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Irini Patsaki, George Gioftsos, George A Koumantakis
{"title":"非特异性慢性颈痛患者两种方法的颈椎活动范围可靠性与人口统计学、前倾头位和呼吸力学的关系","authors":"Petros I Tatsios, Eirini Grammatopoulou, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Irini Patsaki, George Gioftsos, George A Koumantakis","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10030269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: New smartphone-based methods for measuring cervical spine range of motion (CS-ROM) and posture are emerging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of three such methods in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP). <b>Methods</b>: The within-day test-retest reliability of CS-ROM and forward head posture (craniovertebral angle-CVA) was examined in 45 patients with NSCNP. CS-ROM was simultaneously measured with an accelerometer sensor (KFORCE Sens<sup>®</sup>) and a mobile phone device (iHandy and Compass apps), testing the accuracy of each and the parallel-forms reliability between the two methods. For construct validity, correlations of CS-ROM with demographics, lifestyle, and other cervical and thoracic spine biomechanically based measures were examined in 90 patients with NSCNP. Male-female differences were also explored. <b>Results</b>: Both methods were reliable, with measurements concurring between the two devices in all six movement directions (intraclass correlation coefficient/ICC = 0.90-0.99, standard error of the measurement/SEM = 0.54-3.09°). Male-female differences were only noted for two CS-ROM measures and CVA. Significant associations were documented: (a) between the six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.22-0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.05), (b) participants' age with five out of six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.23-0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and CVA (R = 0.21, <i>p</i> < 0.05), (c) CVA with two out of six CS-ROM measures (extension R = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.005 and left-side flexion R = 0.21, <i>p</i> < 0.05), body mass (R = -0.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001), body mass index (R = -0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and chest wall expansion (R = 0.24-0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly lower forward head posture was noted in subjects with a high level of physical activity relative to those with a low level of physical activity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reliability of both CS-ROM methods was excellent. Reductions in CS-ROM and increases in CVA were age-dependent in NSCNP. The significant relationship identified between CVA and CWE possibly signifies interconnections between NSCNP and the biomechanical aspect of dysfunctional breathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical Spine Range of Motion Reliability with Two Methods and Associations with Demographics, Forward Head Posture, and Respiratory Mechanics in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Petros I Tatsios, Eirini Grammatopoulou, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Irini Patsaki, George Gioftsos, George A Koumantakis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10030269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: New smartphone-based methods for measuring cervical spine range of motion (CS-ROM) and posture are emerging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of three such methods in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP). <b>Methods</b>: The within-day test-retest reliability of CS-ROM and forward head posture (craniovertebral angle-CVA) was examined in 45 patients with NSCNP. CS-ROM was simultaneously measured with an accelerometer sensor (KFORCE Sens<sup>®</sup>) and a mobile phone device (iHandy and Compass apps), testing the accuracy of each and the parallel-forms reliability between the two methods. For construct validity, correlations of CS-ROM with demographics, lifestyle, and other cervical and thoracic spine biomechanically based measures were examined in 90 patients with NSCNP. Male-female differences were also explored. <b>Results</b>: Both methods were reliable, with measurements concurring between the two devices in all six movement directions (intraclass correlation coefficient/ICC = 0.90-0.99, standard error of the measurement/SEM = 0.54-3.09°). Male-female differences were only noted for two CS-ROM measures and CVA. Significant associations were documented: (a) between the six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.22-0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.05), (b) participants' age with five out of six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.23-0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and CVA (R = 0.21, <i>p</i> < 0.05), (c) CVA with two out of six CS-ROM measures (extension R = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.005 and left-side flexion R = 0.21, <i>p</i> < 0.05), body mass (R = -0.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001), body mass index (R = -0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and chest wall expansion (R = 0.24-0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly lower forward head posture was noted in subjects with a high level of physical activity relative to those with a low level of physical activity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reliability of both CS-ROM methods was excellent. Reductions in CS-ROM and increases in CVA were age-dependent in NSCNP. The significant relationship identified between CVA and CWE possibly signifies interconnections between NSCNP and the biomechanical aspect of dysfunctional breathing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:新的基于智能手机的测量颈椎活动范围(CS-ROM)和姿势的方法正在出现。本研究的目的是评估这三种方法在非特异性慢性颈部疼痛(NSCNP)患者中的可靠性和有效性。方法:对45例NSCNP患者进行CS-ROM和前倾头位(颅椎角- cva)的日内重测信度检测。CS-ROM用加速度计传感器(KFORCE Sens®)和移动电话设备(iHandy和Compass应用程序)同时测量,测试每种方法的准确性和两种方法之间的平行形式可靠性。为了构建效度,我们在90例NSCNP患者中检测了CS-ROM与人口统计学、生活方式和其他颈椎和胸椎生物力学指标的相关性。研究还探讨了男女之间的差异。结果:两种方法均可靠,两种仪器在6个运动方向上的测量结果一致(类内相关系数/ICC = 0.90 ~ 0.99,测量标准误差/SEM = 0.54 ~ 3.09°)。男女差异仅在两个CS-ROM测量和CVA上被注意到。之间的重要关联记录:(a) 6 CS-ROM措施(R = 0.22 - -0.54, p < 0.05), (b)参与者的年龄与五六CS-ROM措施(R = 0.23 - -0.40, p < 0.05)和脑血管意外(R = 0.21, p < 0.05), (c)患者有两个六CS-ROM措施(扩展R = 0.29, p = 0.005和左侧弯曲R = 0.21, p < 0.05),体重(R = -0.39, p < 0.001),身体质量指数(R = -0.52, p < 0.001),和胸壁扩张(R = 0.24 - -0.29, p < 0.05)。体力活动水平高的受试者头部前倾明显低于体力活动水平低的受试者。结论:两种方法的可靠性均较好。NSCNP患者CS-ROM的减少和CVA的增加与年龄有关。CVA和CWE之间的显著关系可能表明NSCNP与呼吸功能障碍的生物力学方面存在相互联系。
Cervical Spine Range of Motion Reliability with Two Methods and Associations with Demographics, Forward Head Posture, and Respiratory Mechanics in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain.
Objectives: New smartphone-based methods for measuring cervical spine range of motion (CS-ROM) and posture are emerging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of three such methods in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP). Methods: The within-day test-retest reliability of CS-ROM and forward head posture (craniovertebral angle-CVA) was examined in 45 patients with NSCNP. CS-ROM was simultaneously measured with an accelerometer sensor (KFORCE Sens®) and a mobile phone device (iHandy and Compass apps), testing the accuracy of each and the parallel-forms reliability between the two methods. For construct validity, correlations of CS-ROM with demographics, lifestyle, and other cervical and thoracic spine biomechanically based measures were examined in 90 patients with NSCNP. Male-female differences were also explored. Results: Both methods were reliable, with measurements concurring between the two devices in all six movement directions (intraclass correlation coefficient/ICC = 0.90-0.99, standard error of the measurement/SEM = 0.54-3.09°). Male-female differences were only noted for two CS-ROM measures and CVA. Significant associations were documented: (a) between the six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.22-0.54, p < 0.05), (b) participants' age with five out of six CS-ROM measures (R = 0.23-0.40, p < 0.05) and CVA (R = 0.21, p < 0.05), (c) CVA with two out of six CS-ROM measures (extension R = 0.29, p = 0.005 and left-side flexion R = 0.21, p < 0.05), body mass (R = -0.39, p < 0.001), body mass index (R = -0.52, p < 0.001), and chest wall expansion (R = 0.24-0.29, p < 0.05). Significantly lower forward head posture was noted in subjects with a high level of physical activity relative to those with a low level of physical activity. Conclusions: The reliability of both CS-ROM methods was excellent. Reductions in CS-ROM and increases in CVA were age-dependent in NSCNP. The significant relationship identified between CVA and CWE possibly signifies interconnections between NSCNP and the biomechanical aspect of dysfunctional breathing.