J-HOP研究:左心室肥厚患者家庭血压控制状况与心血管预后的关系

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Takeshi Fujiwara, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuomi Kario
{"title":"J-HOP研究:左心室肥厚患者家庭血压控制状况与心血管预后的关系","authors":"Takeshi Fujiwara, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuomi Kario","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the association between home blood pressure (BP) control status and the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) Study participants underwent home BP monitoring in the morning and evening for a 14-day period and echocardiography at baseline. Controlled home BP was defined as morning SBP less than 135 mmHg and morning DBP less than 85 mmHg. LVH was defined as LV mass index greater than 115 g/m2 in males and greater than 95 g/m2 in females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1823 participants [mean [SD] age: 65.1 [11.6] years; 48.6% men; 82% on antihypertensive medications], 1112 (61%) showed uncontrolled BP, and 662 (36.3%) participants had LVH (233 men, 429 women). Over a median 6.8-year follow-up (11 985 person-years), 140 total CVD events occurred. In the uncontrolled BP group (n = 440), participants with LVH had higher incident rates of total CVD events compared to those without LVH, but this was not the case in the controlled BP group. Cox models suggested that LVH was associated with increased risk of total CVD events in the uncontrolled BP group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.75], and again, this was not the case in the controlled BP group (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.70-2.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CVD risk associated with LVH differed depending on the morning home BP control status. The assessment of LVH is important to optimize risk stratification of CVD in clinical practice, especially in participants with uncontrolled home BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between home blood pressure control status and cardiovascular prognosis in participants with left ventricular hypertrophy: the J-HOP study.\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Fujiwara, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuomi Kario\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the association between home blood pressure (BP) control status and the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) Study participants underwent home BP monitoring in the morning and evening for a 14-day period and echocardiography at baseline. Controlled home BP was defined as morning SBP less than 135 mmHg and morning DBP less than 85 mmHg. LVH was defined as LV mass index greater than 115 g/m2 in males and greater than 95 g/m2 in females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1823 participants [mean [SD] age: 65.1 [11.6] years; 48.6% men; 82% on antihypertensive medications], 1112 (61%) showed uncontrolled BP, and 662 (36.3%) participants had LVH (233 men, 429 women). Over a median 6.8-year follow-up (11 985 person-years), 140 total CVD events occurred. In the uncontrolled BP group (n = 440), participants with LVH had higher incident rates of total CVD events compared to those without LVH, but this was not the case in the controlled BP group. Cox models suggested that LVH was associated with increased risk of total CVD events in the uncontrolled BP group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.75], and again, this was not the case in the controlled BP group (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.70-2.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CVD risk associated with LVH differed depending on the morning home BP control status. The assessment of LVH is important to optimize risk stratification of CVD in clinical practice, especially in participants with uncontrolled home BP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004101\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨家庭血压(BP)控制状况与左心室肥厚(LVH)相关心血管疾病(CVD)风险的关系。方法:J-HOP(日本晨冲-家庭血压)研究参与者在14天的时间里,每天早晚进行家庭血压监测,并在基线进行超声心动图检查。控制血压定义为早晨收缩压小于135 mmHg,早晨舒张压小于85 mmHg。LVH定义为男性左室质量指数大于115 g/m2,女性大于95 g/m2。结果:1823名参与者[平均[SD]年龄:65.1[11.6]岁;男性48.6%;(82%服用降压药),1112例(61%)患者血压失控,662例(36.3%)患者LVH(男性233例,女性429例)。在中位6.8年的随访期间(11,985人年),总共发生了140起CVD事件。在不受控制的BP组(n = 440)中,与没有LVH的参与者相比,LVH参与者的总CVD事件发生率更高,但在BP控制组中并非如此。Cox模型显示,在不受控制的BP组中,LVH与总CVD事件的风险增加有关[调整风险比(aHR) 1.80, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.17-2.75],而在控制BP组中,情况并非如此(aHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.70-2.50)。结论:与LVH相关的心血管疾病风险随晨间血压控制情况的不同而不同。在临床实践中,LVH的评估对于优化CVD的风险分层非常重要,特别是在家庭血压不受控制的参与者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between home blood pressure control status and cardiovascular prognosis in participants with left ventricular hypertrophy: the J-HOP study.

Objective: We examined the association between home blood pressure (BP) control status and the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical practice.

Methods: J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) Study participants underwent home BP monitoring in the morning and evening for a 14-day period and echocardiography at baseline. Controlled home BP was defined as morning SBP less than 135 mmHg and morning DBP less than 85 mmHg. LVH was defined as LV mass index greater than 115 g/m2 in males and greater than 95 g/m2 in females.

Results: Among 1823 participants [mean [SD] age: 65.1 [11.6] years; 48.6% men; 82% on antihypertensive medications], 1112 (61%) showed uncontrolled BP, and 662 (36.3%) participants had LVH (233 men, 429 women). Over a median 6.8-year follow-up (11 985 person-years), 140 total CVD events occurred. In the uncontrolled BP group (n = 440), participants with LVH had higher incident rates of total CVD events compared to those without LVH, but this was not the case in the controlled BP group. Cox models suggested that LVH was associated with increased risk of total CVD events in the uncontrolled BP group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.75], and again, this was not the case in the controlled BP group (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.70-2.50).

Conclusion: The CVD risk associated with LVH differed depending on the morning home BP control status. The assessment of LVH is important to optimize risk stratification of CVD in clinical practice, especially in participants with uncontrolled home BP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信