淋巴水肿治疗的地区差异和获得复杂的消血疗法:日本的一项全国性调查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mariko Masujima, Shinsuke Akita, Makiko Tazaki, Akane Tsujimoto, Ryoko Katagiri, Chikao Yasuda, Tetsuya Tsuji
{"title":"淋巴水肿治疗的地区差异和获得复杂的消血疗法:日本的一项全国性调查。","authors":"Mariko Masujima, Shinsuke Akita, Makiko Tazaki, Akane Tsujimoto, Ryoko Katagiri, Chikao Yasuda, Tetsuya Tsuji","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymphedema has a significant impact on patient quality of life. However, it remains unclear whether the provision of lymphedema treatment in Japan is uniform across regions. This study aimed to clarify the current situation regarding lymphedema treatment with emphasis on complex decongestive therapies (CDT) availability and implementation in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide web-based survey was conducted. Respondents included healthcare professionals from designated cancer care hospitals and other medical institutions treating lymphedema in Japan. The distribution of variables, including the implementation of lymphedema treatment, was compared between designated cancer care hospitals and other facilities using the chi-square test. Japan was divided into nine regions to compare and analyze access to medical institutions providing CDT for lymphedema on both inpatient and outpatient bases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 372 facility responses analyzed, ˃95% reported treating secondary lymphedema of the extremities, whereas ˂30% treated head and neck lymphedema. The number of CDT inpatients per 100 000 people in the region with the lowest patient volume was approximately 2% of that in the region with the highest volume. Similarly, the number of CDT outpatients per 100 000 people in the lowest-volume region was one-third of that in the highest-volume region. There was no significant correlation between facilities with high outpatient numbers and those with low outpatient numbers (ρ =0.57, P-value = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eliminating regional disparities in access to lymphedema treatment facilities, particularly for inpatient CDT, would improve quality of life and enable patients to manage the condition regardless of where they live.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional disparities in lymphedema treatment and access to complex decongestive therapy: a nationwide survey in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Mariko Masujima, Shinsuke Akita, Makiko Tazaki, Akane Tsujimoto, Ryoko Katagiri, Chikao Yasuda, Tetsuya Tsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyaf120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymphedema has a significant impact on patient quality of life. However, it remains unclear whether the provision of lymphedema treatment in Japan is uniform across regions. This study aimed to clarify the current situation regarding lymphedema treatment with emphasis on complex decongestive therapies (CDT) availability and implementation in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide web-based survey was conducted. Respondents included healthcare professionals from designated cancer care hospitals and other medical institutions treating lymphedema in Japan. The distribution of variables, including the implementation of lymphedema treatment, was compared between designated cancer care hospitals and other facilities using the chi-square test. Japan was divided into nine regions to compare and analyze access to medical institutions providing CDT for lymphedema on both inpatient and outpatient bases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 372 facility responses analyzed, ˃95% reported treating secondary lymphedema of the extremities, whereas ˂30% treated head and neck lymphedema. The number of CDT inpatients per 100 000 people in the region with the lowest patient volume was approximately 2% of that in the region with the highest volume. Similarly, the number of CDT outpatients per 100 000 people in the lowest-volume region was one-third of that in the highest-volume region. There was no significant correlation between facilities with high outpatient numbers and those with low outpatient numbers (ρ =0.57, P-value = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eliminating regional disparities in access to lymphedema treatment facilities, particularly for inpatient CDT, would improve quality of life and enable patients to manage the condition regardless of where they live.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:淋巴水肿对患者的生活质量有显著影响。然而,目前尚不清楚日本各地区提供的淋巴水肿治疗是否统一。本研究旨在阐明日本淋巴水肿治疗的现状,重点是复杂减充血疗法(CDT)的可用性和实施情况。方法:在全国范围内进行网络调查。受访者包括来自日本指定的癌症护理医院和其他治疗淋巴水肿的医疗机构的医疗保健专业人员。变量的分布,包括淋巴水肿治疗的实施,在指定的癌症护理医院和其他机构之间使用卡方检验进行比较。日本被划分为九个地区,以比较和分析在住院和门诊基础上提供淋巴水肿CDT的医疗机构的可及性。结果:在分析的372个设施响应中,有95%的人报告治疗了四肢继发性淋巴水肿,而有30%的人治疗了头颈部淋巴水肿。患者数量最少的地区每10万人中CDT住院人数约为患者数量最多地区的2%。同样,在最低容量地区,每10万人中CDT门诊人数是最高容量地区的三分之一。门诊人数多的医院与门诊人数少的医院之间无显著相关(ρ =0.57, p值= 0.11)。结论:消除在获得淋巴水肿治疗设施方面的地区差异,特别是住院CDT,将提高生活质量,使患者无论居住在哪里都能控制病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional disparities in lymphedema treatment and access to complex decongestive therapy: a nationwide survey in Japan.

Background: Lymphedema has a significant impact on patient quality of life. However, it remains unclear whether the provision of lymphedema treatment in Japan is uniform across regions. This study aimed to clarify the current situation regarding lymphedema treatment with emphasis on complex decongestive therapies (CDT) availability and implementation in Japan.

Methods: A nationwide web-based survey was conducted. Respondents included healthcare professionals from designated cancer care hospitals and other medical institutions treating lymphedema in Japan. The distribution of variables, including the implementation of lymphedema treatment, was compared between designated cancer care hospitals and other facilities using the chi-square test. Japan was divided into nine regions to compare and analyze access to medical institutions providing CDT for lymphedema on both inpatient and outpatient bases.

Results: Of the 372 facility responses analyzed, ˃95% reported treating secondary lymphedema of the extremities, whereas ˂30% treated head and neck lymphedema. The number of CDT inpatients per 100 000 people in the region with the lowest patient volume was approximately 2% of that in the region with the highest volume. Similarly, the number of CDT outpatients per 100 000 people in the lowest-volume region was one-third of that in the highest-volume region. There was no significant correlation between facilities with high outpatient numbers and those with low outpatient numbers (ρ =0.57, P-value = 0.11).

Conclusion: Eliminating regional disparities in access to lymphedema treatment facilities, particularly for inpatient CDT, would improve quality of life and enable patients to manage the condition regardless of where they live.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信