梗阻性和非梗阻性肥厚性心肌病的短期和长期结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hui Zhen Lo BMedSci, MD , Chen Ee Low MBBS , Chun En Yau MBBS , Yao Hao Teo MBBS , Yao Neng Teo MBBS , Tony YW. Li MBBS , Nicholas L. Syn MBBS , Ping Chai MBBS , Weiqin Lin MBBS , Tiong-Cheng Yeo MBBS , William K.F. Kong MBChB , Raymond C.C. Wong MBBS , Ching-Hui Sia MBBS
{"title":"梗阻性和非梗阻性肥厚性心肌病的短期和长期结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hui Zhen Lo BMedSci, MD ,&nbsp;Chen Ee Low MBBS ,&nbsp;Chun En Yau MBBS ,&nbsp;Yao Hao Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Yao Neng Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Tony YW. Li MBBS ,&nbsp;Nicholas L. Syn MBBS ,&nbsp;Ping Chai MBBS ,&nbsp;Weiqin Lin MBBS ,&nbsp;Tiong-Cheng Yeo MBBS ,&nbsp;William K.F. Kong MBChB ,&nbsp;Raymond C.C. Wong MBBS ,&nbsp;Ching-Hui Sia MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac condition, but the risk factors and outcomes of patients with obstructive (HOCM) and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOCM) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the risk ratio (RR), incidence, and risk factors of all-cause and HCM-specific mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This PRISMA-adherent systematic review involved a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase for studies published from 1 January 2001 to 31 August 2023 that reported outcomes of patients with HOCM and NOCM. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used for primary analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-one observational studies with 52,020 participants were included. All-cause, HCM-related, and heart failure-related mortality had no difference in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58–1.25), (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68–1.32), and (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58–1.58), respectively. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19–2.42). Incidence of all-cause mortality (NOCM 95.47, 95% CI 63.96–140.18 vs HOCM 65.75, 95% CI 48.04–89.37) per 1,000 observations, HCM-related mortality (NOCM 59.72, 95% CI 41.91–84.42 vs HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64), and SCD (NOCM 32.17, 95% CI 22.42–45.96 vs HOCM: 25.39 95% CI 15.24–42.01) were higher in NOCM patients, while heart failure-related mortality (HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64 vs NOCM 30.04, 95% CI 14.78–60.11) was higher in HOCM patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RR of SCD was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients. All-cause mortality, HCM-related mortality, and SCD were of higher incidence in NOCM patients. Only heart failure-related mortality was higher in HOCM patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":"34 9","pages":"Pages e104-e124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhen Lo BMedSci, MD ,&nbsp;Chen Ee Low MBBS ,&nbsp;Chun En Yau MBBS ,&nbsp;Yao Hao Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Yao Neng Teo MBBS ,&nbsp;Tony YW. Li MBBS ,&nbsp;Nicholas L. Syn MBBS ,&nbsp;Ping Chai MBBS ,&nbsp;Weiqin Lin MBBS ,&nbsp;Tiong-Cheng Yeo MBBS ,&nbsp;William K.F. Kong MBChB ,&nbsp;Raymond C.C. Wong MBBS ,&nbsp;Ching-Hui Sia MBBS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac condition, but the risk factors and outcomes of patients with obstructive (HOCM) and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOCM) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the risk ratio (RR), incidence, and risk factors of all-cause and HCM-specific mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This PRISMA-adherent systematic review involved a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase for studies published from 1 January 2001 to 31 August 2023 that reported outcomes of patients with HOCM and NOCM. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used for primary analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-one observational studies with 52,020 participants were included. All-cause, HCM-related, and heart failure-related mortality had no difference in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58–1.25), (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68–1.32), and (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58–1.58), respectively. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19–2.42). Incidence of all-cause mortality (NOCM 95.47, 95% CI 63.96–140.18 vs HOCM 65.75, 95% CI 48.04–89.37) per 1,000 observations, HCM-related mortality (NOCM 59.72, 95% CI 41.91–84.42 vs HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64), and SCD (NOCM 32.17, 95% CI 22.42–45.96 vs HOCM: 25.39 95% CI 15.24–42.01) were higher in NOCM patients, while heart failure-related mortality (HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64 vs NOCM 30.04, 95% CI 14.78–60.11) was higher in HOCM patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RR of SCD was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients. All-cause mortality, HCM-related mortality, and SCD were of higher incidence in NOCM patients. Only heart failure-related mortality was higher in HOCM patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages e104-e124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950625002033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950625002033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥厚性心肌病(HCM)是最常见的遗传性心脏病,但梗阻性(HOCM)和非梗阻性肥厚性心肌病(NOCM)患者的危险因素和预后尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在调查全因死亡率和hcm特异性死亡率的风险比(RR)、发病率和危险因素。方法:本系统评价采用prisma技术,系统检索PubMed、SCOPUS和Embase,检索2001年1月1日至2023年8月31日期间发表的关于HOCM和NOCM患者预后的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归进行初步分析。结果:纳入61项观察性研究,52,020名受试者。HOCM与NOCM患者的全因死亡率、hcm相关死亡率和心力衰竭相关死亡率分别无差异(RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58-1.25)、(RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68-1.32)和(RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58-1.58)。HOCM患者的心源性猝死(SCD)明显高于NOCM患者(RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.42)。每1000次观察的全因死亡率(NOCM 95.47, 95% CI 63.96-140.18 vs HOCM 65.75, 95% CI 48.04-89.37)、hcm相关死亡率(NOCM 59.72, 95% CI 41.91-84.42 vs HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42-77.64)和SCD (NOCM 32.17, 95% CI 22.42-45.96 vs HOCM: 25.39 95% CI 15.24-42.01)在HOCM患者中较高,而心力衰竭相关死亡率(HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42-77.64 vs NOCM 30.04, 95% CI 14.78-60.11)在HOCM患者中较高。结论:HOCM患者SCD的RR明显高于NOCM患者。NOCM患者的全因死亡率、hcm相关死亡率和SCD发生率较高。只有心力衰竭相关的死亡率在HOCM患者中较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac condition, but the risk factors and outcomes of patients with obstructive (HOCM) and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOCM) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the risk ratio (RR), incidence, and risk factors of all-cause and HCM-specific mortality.

Methods

This PRISMA-adherent systematic review involved a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase for studies published from 1 January 2001 to 31 August 2023 that reported outcomes of patients with HOCM and NOCM. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used for primary analysis.

Results

Sixty-one observational studies with 52,020 participants were included. All-cause, HCM-related, and heart failure-related mortality had no difference in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58–1.25), (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68–1.32), and (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58–1.58), respectively. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19–2.42). Incidence of all-cause mortality (NOCM 95.47, 95% CI 63.96–140.18 vs HOCM 65.75, 95% CI 48.04–89.37) per 1,000 observations, HCM-related mortality (NOCM 59.72, 95% CI 41.91–84.42 vs HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64), and SCD (NOCM 32.17, 95% CI 22.42–45.96 vs HOCM: 25.39 95% CI 15.24–42.01) were higher in NOCM patients, while heart failure-related mortality (HOCM 55.51, 95% CI 39.42–77.64 vs NOCM 30.04, 95% CI 14.78–60.11) was higher in HOCM patients.

Conclusions

The RR of SCD was significantly higher in HOCM vs NOCM patients. All-cause mortality, HCM-related mortality, and SCD were of higher incidence in NOCM patients. Only heart failure-related mortality was higher in HOCM patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信