提高传染病培训中的临床能力:对实习医生Mini-CEX实施的纵向研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1582218
Xiaohao Wang, Hu Li, Yi Liu, Dazhi Zhang, Dachuan Cai, Shan Zhong
{"title":"提高传染病培训中的临床能力:对实习医生Mini-CEX实施的纵向研究。","authors":"Xiaohao Wang, Hu Li, Yi Liu, Dazhi Zhang, Dachuan Cai, Shan Zhong","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1582218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in assessing and improving clinical competencies among medical interns during a 4-week infectious disease rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six medical interns were assessed using Mini-CEX at the start and end of their rotation. The tool evaluated seven domains: history taking, physical examination, clinical judgment, humanistic care, communication skills, organizational effectiveness, and overall competence. Teaching physicians were trained uniformly before the trial. After the internship, interns and teaching physicians completed questionnaires and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the internship period when Mini-CEX was implemented, significant improvements were observed in interns' clinical skills across multiple domains. For example, the average scores of interns in history taking increased from 5.12 ± 0.89 to 6.22 ± 1.01, and in physical examination from 3.97 ± 0.69 to 5.24 ± 0.86. Interns showed high acceptance and satisfaction with Mini-CEX. The implementation of Mini-CEX also improved teaching effectiveness, with enhanced teacher-student interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mini-CEX is a feasible and effective tool for clinical skill development in infectious disease training. Its structured feedback mechanism aligns with competency-based medical education (CBME) goals. Future studies should explore its scalability across disciplines and integration with complementary assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1582218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing clinical competency in infectious disease training: a longitudinal study of Mini-CEX implementation for medical interns.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohao Wang, Hu Li, Yi Liu, Dazhi Zhang, Dachuan Cai, Shan Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2025.1582218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in assessing and improving clinical competencies among medical interns during a 4-week infectious disease rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six medical interns were assessed using Mini-CEX at the start and end of their rotation. The tool evaluated seven domains: history taking, physical examination, clinical judgment, humanistic care, communication skills, organizational effectiveness, and overall competence. Teaching physicians were trained uniformly before the trial. After the internship, interns and teaching physicians completed questionnaires and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the internship period when Mini-CEX was implemented, significant improvements were observed in interns' clinical skills across multiple domains. For example, the average scores of interns in history taking increased from 5.12 ± 0.89 to 6.22 ± 1.01, and in physical examination from 3.97 ± 0.69 to 5.24 ± 0.86. Interns showed high acceptance and satisfaction with Mini-CEX. The implementation of Mini-CEX also improved teaching effectiveness, with enhanced teacher-student interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mini-CEX is a feasible and effective tool for clinical skill development in infectious disease training. Its structured feedback mechanism aligns with competency-based medical education (CBME) goals. Future studies should explore its scalability across disciplines and integration with complementary assessment tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1582218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1582218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1582218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)在评估和提高医学实习生在4周传染病轮转期间的临床能力方面的有效性。方法:在轮转开始和结束时使用Mini-CEX对46名医学实习生进行评估。该工具评估了七个领域:病史、体检、临床判断、人文关怀、沟通技巧、组织效率和整体能力。在试验前对教学医师进行了统一的培训。实习结束后,实习生和授课医师完成问卷调查和访谈。结果:在实施Mini-CEX实习期间,实习生在多个领域的临床技能均有显著提高。例如,实习生的历史课平均分从5.12 ± 0.89提高到6.22 ± 1.01,体格检查从3.97 ± 0.69提高到5.24 ± 0.86。实习生对Mini-CEX的接受度和满意度都很高。Mini-CEX的实施也提高了教学效率,加强了师生互动。结论:Mini-CEX是传染病临床技能培养的有效工具。其结构化反馈机制与基于能力的医学教育(CBME)目标一致。未来的研究应探索其跨学科的可扩展性和与互补评估工具的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing clinical competency in infectious disease training: a longitudinal study of Mini-CEX implementation for medical interns.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in assessing and improving clinical competencies among medical interns during a 4-week infectious disease rotation.

Methods: Forty-six medical interns were assessed using Mini-CEX at the start and end of their rotation. The tool evaluated seven domains: history taking, physical examination, clinical judgment, humanistic care, communication skills, organizational effectiveness, and overall competence. Teaching physicians were trained uniformly before the trial. After the internship, interns and teaching physicians completed questionnaires and interviews.

Results: During the internship period when Mini-CEX was implemented, significant improvements were observed in interns' clinical skills across multiple domains. For example, the average scores of interns in history taking increased from 5.12 ± 0.89 to 6.22 ± 1.01, and in physical examination from 3.97 ± 0.69 to 5.24 ± 0.86. Interns showed high acceptance and satisfaction with Mini-CEX. The implementation of Mini-CEX also improved teaching effectiveness, with enhanced teacher-student interactions.

Conclusion: Mini-CEX is a feasible and effective tool for clinical skill development in infectious disease training. Its structured feedback mechanism aligns with competency-based medical education (CBME) goals. Future studies should explore its scalability across disciplines and integration with complementary assessment tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信