内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗外阴癌是否可行?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174
Giacomo Guidi, Angelica Naldini, Giorgia Garganese, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Anna Fagotti, Nicoló Bizzarri
{"title":"内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗外阴癌是否可行?","authors":"Giacomo Guidi, Angelica Naldini, Giorgia Garganese, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Anna Fagotti, Nicoló Bizzarri","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The evaluation of lymph node status is crucial for the correct staging of patients with vulvar carcinoma and to assess whether adjuvant treatment is necessary. Classically, this procedure is performed with an open approach to the inguinal region; however, this procedure is associated with a significant complication rate.For this reason, the video-endoscopic approach to inguinal lymph node assessment has been proposed in recent years. This review aimed to provide an overview on the feasibility and outcomes of the video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>VEIL appeared to be a viable alternative to the open approach, with similar outcomes in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed and blood loss. While the postoperative complications rate was lower in the VEIL group, operative times tended to be longer. This may be due to the lack of standardization of the technique and to the variability in video-endoscopic approaches (laparoscopic vs robotic). Sentinel lymph node biopsy with endoscopic approach has also been described.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>VEIL appears to be feasible and safe, adding benefits in terms of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, few studies are available and further data is needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"487-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer, is it feasible?\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Guidi, Angelica Naldini, Giorgia Garganese, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Anna Fagotti, Nicoló Bizzarri\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The evaluation of lymph node status is crucial for the correct staging of patients with vulvar carcinoma and to assess whether adjuvant treatment is necessary. Classically, this procedure is performed with an open approach to the inguinal region; however, this procedure is associated with a significant complication rate.For this reason, the video-endoscopic approach to inguinal lymph node assessment has been proposed in recent years. This review aimed to provide an overview on the feasibility and outcomes of the video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>VEIL appeared to be a viable alternative to the open approach, with similar outcomes in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed and blood loss. While the postoperative complications rate was lower in the VEIL group, operative times tended to be longer. This may be due to the lack of standardization of the technique and to the variability in video-endoscopic approaches (laparoscopic vs robotic). Sentinel lymph node biopsy with endoscopic approach has also been described.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>VEIL appears to be feasible and safe, adding benefits in terms of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, few studies are available and further data is needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"487-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:淋巴结状态的评估对于外阴癌患者的正确分期和是否需要辅助治疗至关重要。通常,该手术采用开放入路进入腹股沟区域;然而,该手术的并发症发生率很高。因此,近年来提出了视频内镜方法来评估腹股沟淋巴结。本文综述了视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术(VEIL)的可行性和结果。最近的研究发现:VEIL似乎是开放入路的可行替代方案,在淋巴结切除数量和出血量方面具有相似的结果。VEIL组术后并发症发生率较低,但手术时间较长。这可能是由于技术缺乏标准化以及视频内窥镜入路的可变性(腹腔镜与机器人)。前哨淋巴结活检内镜方法也被描述。总结:VEIL似乎是可行和安全的,在术后并发症方面增加了益处。然而,现有的研究很少,需要进一步的数据来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer, is it feasible?

Purpose of review: The evaluation of lymph node status is crucial for the correct staging of patients with vulvar carcinoma and to assess whether adjuvant treatment is necessary. Classically, this procedure is performed with an open approach to the inguinal region; however, this procedure is associated with a significant complication rate.For this reason, the video-endoscopic approach to inguinal lymph node assessment has been proposed in recent years. This review aimed to provide an overview on the feasibility and outcomes of the video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL).

Recent findings: VEIL appeared to be a viable alternative to the open approach, with similar outcomes in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed and blood loss. While the postoperative complications rate was lower in the VEIL group, operative times tended to be longer. This may be due to the lack of standardization of the technique and to the variability in video-endoscopic approaches (laparoscopic vs robotic). Sentinel lymph node biopsy with endoscopic approach has also been described.

Summary: VEIL appears to be feasible and safe, adding benefits in terms of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, few studies are available and further data is needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信