术前应用弥散加权成像及血液炎症标志物鉴别平滑肌肉瘤与非典型平滑肌瘤。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Saranya Das, Kavita Shapriya, Andrea Da Silva, Xingfeng Li, Alastair Jackson, Nishat Bharwani, Baljeet Kaur, Andrea G Rockall
{"title":"术前应用弥散加权成像及血液炎症标志物鉴别平滑肌肉瘤与非典型平滑肌瘤。","authors":"Saranya Das, Kavita Shapriya, Andrea Da Silva, Xingfeng Li, Alastair Jackson, Nishat Bharwani, Baljeet Kaur, Andrea G Rockall","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) findings between leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and atypical/degenerate leiomyoma (LM) and evaluate the usefulness of this biomarker for diagnosis. Additionally it will explore the potential of preoperative neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a haematological marker to aid in the differentiation of LMS from atypical LM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histologically proven LMS and LM patients between 2013-2023 were included. For all patients (191 LM, 18 LMS), the pre-operative full blood count was analysed, and the NLR calculated. Whole volume of interest (VOI) and focal region of interest (ROI) areas were manually segmented on patients with DW-MRI sequences available (52 LM, 12 LMS). Mann-Whitney and Fishers exact test were used to assess statistical significance and ROC curves for diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VOI and ROI mean ADC values were significantly lower for LMS than LM, with ROI mean ADC demonstrating greater diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.817 vs 0.755). Applying a threshold ROI mean ADC value of ≤ 1.00 x10-3 mm2/sec achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 88.3% and 65.4% respectively. A higher NLR was suggestive of LMS (median 2.8 vs 1.7 for LM).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC, particularly a focal ROI is useful in differentiating LMS from LM. Differences in preoperative blood markers, suggest an inflammatory-malignancy relationship. Future risk stratification models of ADC and haematological parameters should be explored.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study adds to few studies comparing using both ROI and VOI based methods, and no study has assessed both haematological markers and ADC metrics to aid differentiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Blood Inflammatory markers to preoperatively differentiate between leiomyosarcoma and atypical leiomyomas.\",\"authors\":\"Saranya Das, Kavita Shapriya, Andrea Da Silva, Xingfeng Li, Alastair Jackson, Nishat Bharwani, Baljeet Kaur, Andrea G Rockall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) findings between leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and atypical/degenerate leiomyoma (LM) and evaluate the usefulness of this biomarker for diagnosis. Additionally it will explore the potential of preoperative neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a haematological marker to aid in the differentiation of LMS from atypical LM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histologically proven LMS and LM patients between 2013-2023 were included. For all patients (191 LM, 18 LMS), the pre-operative full blood count was analysed, and the NLR calculated. Whole volume of interest (VOI) and focal region of interest (ROI) areas were manually segmented on patients with DW-MRI sequences available (52 LM, 12 LMS). Mann-Whitney and Fishers exact test were used to assess statistical significance and ROC curves for diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VOI and ROI mean ADC values were significantly lower for LMS than LM, with ROI mean ADC demonstrating greater diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.817 vs 0.755). Applying a threshold ROI mean ADC value of ≤ 1.00 x10-3 mm2/sec achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 88.3% and 65.4% respectively. A higher NLR was suggestive of LMS (median 2.8 vs 1.7 for LM).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC, particularly a focal ROI is useful in differentiating LMS from LM. Differences in preoperative blood markers, suggest an inflammatory-malignancy relationship. Future risk stratification models of ADC and haematological parameters should be explored.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study adds to few studies comparing using both ROI and VOI based methods, and no study has assessed both haematological markers and ADC metrics to aid differentiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较平滑肌肉瘤(LMS)和非典型/退行性平滑肌瘤(LM)的表观扩散系数(ADC)结果,并评估这一生物标志物在诊断中的实用性。此外,它将探讨术前中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率(NLR)作为血液学标志物的潜力,以帮助鉴别LMS与非典型LM。方法:纳入2013-2023年组织学证实的LMS和LM患者。对所有患者(LM 191例,LMS 18例)进行术前全血细胞计数分析,并计算NLR。对可用DW-MRI序列的患者(52个LM, 12个LMS)进行全感兴趣体积(VOI)和焦点感兴趣区域(ROI)的人工分割。采用Mann-Whitney和fisher精确检验评估诊断效能的统计学显著性和ROC曲线。结果:LMS的VOI和ROI平均ADC值明显低于LM, ROI平均ADC显示出更高的诊断准确性(AUC为0.817比0.755)。采用≤1.00 x10-3 mm2/sec的ROI均值阈值,灵敏度和特异度分别为88.3%和65.4%。NLR较高提示LMS(中位数2.8 vs中位数1.7)。结论:ADC,特别是焦点ROI是区分LMS和LM的有用方法。术前血液标志物的差异提示炎症与恶性肿瘤的关系。未来的ADC风险分层模型和血液学参数有待探讨。知识进展:本研究增加了使用ROI和VOI方法进行比较的少数研究,并且没有研究同时评估血液学标志物和ADC指标来帮助区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Blood Inflammatory markers to preoperatively differentiate between leiomyosarcoma and atypical leiomyomas.

Objectives: This study aims to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) findings between leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and atypical/degenerate leiomyoma (LM) and evaluate the usefulness of this biomarker for diagnosis. Additionally it will explore the potential of preoperative neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a haematological marker to aid in the differentiation of LMS from atypical LM.

Methods: Histologically proven LMS and LM patients between 2013-2023 were included. For all patients (191 LM, 18 LMS), the pre-operative full blood count was analysed, and the NLR calculated. Whole volume of interest (VOI) and focal region of interest (ROI) areas were manually segmented on patients with DW-MRI sequences available (52 LM, 12 LMS). Mann-Whitney and Fishers exact test were used to assess statistical significance and ROC curves for diagnostic performance.

Results: VOI and ROI mean ADC values were significantly lower for LMS than LM, with ROI mean ADC demonstrating greater diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.817 vs 0.755). Applying a threshold ROI mean ADC value of ≤ 1.00 x10-3 mm2/sec achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 88.3% and 65.4% respectively. A higher NLR was suggestive of LMS (median 2.8 vs 1.7 for LM).

Conclusions: ADC, particularly a focal ROI is useful in differentiating LMS from LM. Differences in preoperative blood markers, suggest an inflammatory-malignancy relationship. Future risk stratification models of ADC and haematological parameters should be explored.

Advances in knowledge: This study adds to few studies comparing using both ROI and VOI based methods, and no study has assessed both haematological markers and ADC metrics to aid differentiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信