Julie Hallet, Tiago Ribeiro, Alyson L Mahar, Wing C Chan, Daniel I McIsaac, Anna Gombay, Anna Ding, Jessica Armah, Natalie Coburn, Amy T Hsu
{"title":"老年人癌症手术后的家庭护理:一种预测工具的推导和验证。","authors":"Julie Hallet, Tiago Ribeiro, Alyson L Mahar, Wing C Chan, Daniel I McIsaac, Anna Gombay, Anna Ding, Jessica Armah, Natalie Coburn, Amy T Hsu","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17824-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Need for home support after surgery is a patient-centred outcome and marker of functional recovery for older adults. We developed a risk prediction model, HOMECARE, to estimate the risk of using homecare for older adults after cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults ≥ 70 years having surgery for solid malignancy (2007-2019). Candidate predictors were preoperative sociodemographic and clinical factors. Receipt of immediate (within 1 month) and chronic (at 7-12 months) homecare was predicted. Internal validation used bootstraps with 500 samples with replacement. Logistic regression models were used. The predictive model included age, sex, rural residence, previous cancer diagnosis, frailty, prior homecare use, cancer site, cancer stage, and type of surgery. We performed bootstrap validation by using 500 samples with replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 93,883 patients included, 39,169 (41.7%) required immediate homecare; of the 88,252 alive after month 6 postoperatively, 22,031 (25%) required chronic homecare. For immediate homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.77 and the deviation of predicted from observed probability was - 0.002% (95% CI 0.004 to - 0.009). For chronic homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.76, and the deviation of predicted from observed probabilities was - 0.004% (95% CI 0.002 to - 0.009). Deviation between predicted and observed probabilities ranged from - 0.04 to 0.03% across risk deciles for immediate homecare and - 0.05 to 0.04% for chronic homecare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HOMECARE tool presents good discrimination and is well calibrated. Implemented as an online calculator, individualized risk estimates from this tool could support risk communication with older adults selected for cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7680-7692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homecare After Cancer Surgery for Older Adults: Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Hallet, Tiago Ribeiro, Alyson L Mahar, Wing C Chan, Daniel I McIsaac, Anna Gombay, Anna Ding, Jessica Armah, Natalie Coburn, Amy T Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17824-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Need for home support after surgery is a patient-centred outcome and marker of functional recovery for older adults. We developed a risk prediction model, HOMECARE, to estimate the risk of using homecare for older adults after cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults ≥ 70 years having surgery for solid malignancy (2007-2019). Candidate predictors were preoperative sociodemographic and clinical factors. Receipt of immediate (within 1 month) and chronic (at 7-12 months) homecare was predicted. Internal validation used bootstraps with 500 samples with replacement. Logistic regression models were used. The predictive model included age, sex, rural residence, previous cancer diagnosis, frailty, prior homecare use, cancer site, cancer stage, and type of surgery. We performed bootstrap validation by using 500 samples with replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 93,883 patients included, 39,169 (41.7%) required immediate homecare; of the 88,252 alive after month 6 postoperatively, 22,031 (25%) required chronic homecare. For immediate homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.77 and the deviation of predicted from observed probability was - 0.002% (95% CI 0.004 to - 0.009). For chronic homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.76, and the deviation of predicted from observed probabilities was - 0.004% (95% CI 0.002 to - 0.009). Deviation between predicted and observed probabilities ranged from - 0.04 to 0.03% across risk deciles for immediate homecare and - 0.05 to 0.04% for chronic homecare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HOMECARE tool presents good discrimination and is well calibrated. Implemented as an online calculator, individualized risk estimates from this tool could support risk communication with older adults selected for cancer surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7680-7692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17824-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17824-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手术后需要家庭支持是一个以患者为中心的结果,也是老年人功能恢复的标志。我们开发了一个风险预测模型,HOMECARE,来估计老年人在癌症手术后使用家庭护理的风险。方法:我们进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为≥70岁的实体恶性肿瘤手术患者(2007-2019)。候选预测因子为术前社会人口学因素和临床因素。接受即时(1个月内)和长期(7-12个月)家庭护理。内部验证使用带有500个样本的bootstrap进行替换。采用Logistic回归模型。预测模型包括年龄、性别、农村居住、既往癌症诊断、虚弱、既往家庭护理使用、癌症部位、癌症分期和手术类型。我们通过使用500个带有替换的样本来执行自举验证。结果:纳入的93,883例患者中,39,169例(41.7%)需要立即家庭护理;术后6个月存活的88252例患者中,22,031例(25%)需要长期家庭护理。对于即时家庭护理,曲线下面积为0.77,预测与观察概率的偏差为- 0.002% (95% CI 0.004至- 0.009)。对于慢性家庭护理,曲线下面积为0.76,预测概率与观测概率的偏差为- 0.004% (95% CI 0.002至- 0.009)。在风险十分位数中,预测概率与观察概率之间的偏差范围为- 0.04至0.03%,对于即时家庭护理和- 0.05至0.04%的慢性家庭护理。结论:该工具具有良好的鉴别性和校准性。作为一个在线计算器,该工具的个性化风险评估可以支持与选择接受癌症手术的老年人进行风险沟通。
Homecare After Cancer Surgery for Older Adults: Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Tool.
Background: Need for home support after surgery is a patient-centred outcome and marker of functional recovery for older adults. We developed a risk prediction model, HOMECARE, to estimate the risk of using homecare for older adults after cancer surgery.
Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults ≥ 70 years having surgery for solid malignancy (2007-2019). Candidate predictors were preoperative sociodemographic and clinical factors. Receipt of immediate (within 1 month) and chronic (at 7-12 months) homecare was predicted. Internal validation used bootstraps with 500 samples with replacement. Logistic regression models were used. The predictive model included age, sex, rural residence, previous cancer diagnosis, frailty, prior homecare use, cancer site, cancer stage, and type of surgery. We performed bootstrap validation by using 500 samples with replacement.
Results: Of 93,883 patients included, 39,169 (41.7%) required immediate homecare; of the 88,252 alive after month 6 postoperatively, 22,031 (25%) required chronic homecare. For immediate homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.77 and the deviation of predicted from observed probability was - 0.002% (95% CI 0.004 to - 0.009). For chronic homecare, the area-under-the-curve was 0.76, and the deviation of predicted from observed probabilities was - 0.004% (95% CI 0.002 to - 0.009). Deviation between predicted and observed probabilities ranged from - 0.04 to 0.03% across risk deciles for immediate homecare and - 0.05 to 0.04% for chronic homecare.
Conclusions: The HOMECARE tool presents good discrimination and is well calibrated. Implemented as an online calculator, individualized risk estimates from this tool could support risk communication with older adults selected for cancer surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.