{"title":"如何在计算机评估中加强详细反馈:多媒体和情感设计因素的作用","authors":"Livia Kuklick , Marlit Annalena Lindner","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effects of computer-based feedback content have received much attention in the literature. In contrast, the effects of visual design features in feedback messages are understudied. This experiment examined the cognitive and the emotional benefit of adding a representational picture and/or informative emotional design elements to <em>elaborated feedback</em> in a computer-based low-stakes assessment. In a 2x2 + 1 between-subjects study, 410 undergraduates worked on a geometry assessment receiving either no feedback (control group) vs. immediate, elaborated feedback messages in different design variations: We systematically varied the presence of a representational picture (without/with) and of emotional design features (without/with). Compared to no feedback, the four feedback variants enhanced positive emotions and reduced negative emotions after correct responses but reduced positive emotions and enhanced negative emotions after incorrect responses. All feedback variants effectively enhanced students’ error correction in a posttest (i.e., recall on initially incorrect responses) and students across all feedback groups voluntarily spent longer time on elaborated feedback messages after incorrect responses. Yet, the time spent on the feedback messages was not significantly affected by the design features. This pattern of results suggests that students actively processed the negative feedback, independent of its design. However, compared to text-only feedback, only adding a picture improved students’ reported level of positive emotions when the feedback referred to a mistake (i.e., after incorrect responses). Overall, our results indicate that pictures can serve as emotional facilitators and could enhance text-only feedback messages to mitigate a negative affective impact of automated error notifications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to enhance elaborated feedback in computer-based assessment: The role of multimedia and emotional design factors\",\"authors\":\"Livia Kuklick , Marlit Annalena Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effects of computer-based feedback content have received much attention in the literature. In contrast, the effects of visual design features in feedback messages are understudied. This experiment examined the cognitive and the emotional benefit of adding a representational picture and/or informative emotional design elements to <em>elaborated feedback</em> in a computer-based low-stakes assessment. In a 2x2 + 1 between-subjects study, 410 undergraduates worked on a geometry assessment receiving either no feedback (control group) vs. immediate, elaborated feedback messages in different design variations: We systematically varied the presence of a representational picture (without/with) and of emotional design features (without/with). Compared to no feedback, the four feedback variants enhanced positive emotions and reduced negative emotions after correct responses but reduced positive emotions and enhanced negative emotions after incorrect responses. All feedback variants effectively enhanced students’ error correction in a posttest (i.e., recall on initially incorrect responses) and students across all feedback groups voluntarily spent longer time on elaborated feedback messages after incorrect responses. Yet, the time spent on the feedback messages was not significantly affected by the design features. This pattern of results suggests that students actively processed the negative feedback, independent of its design. However, compared to text-only feedback, only adding a picture improved students’ reported level of positive emotions when the feedback referred to a mistake (i.e., after incorrect responses). Overall, our results indicate that pictures can serve as emotional facilitators and could enhance text-only feedback messages to mitigate a negative affective impact of automated error notifications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X2500061X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X2500061X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How to enhance elaborated feedback in computer-based assessment: The role of multimedia and emotional design factors
Effects of computer-based feedback content have received much attention in the literature. In contrast, the effects of visual design features in feedback messages are understudied. This experiment examined the cognitive and the emotional benefit of adding a representational picture and/or informative emotional design elements to elaborated feedback in a computer-based low-stakes assessment. In a 2x2 + 1 between-subjects study, 410 undergraduates worked on a geometry assessment receiving either no feedback (control group) vs. immediate, elaborated feedback messages in different design variations: We systematically varied the presence of a representational picture (without/with) and of emotional design features (without/with). Compared to no feedback, the four feedback variants enhanced positive emotions and reduced negative emotions after correct responses but reduced positive emotions and enhanced negative emotions after incorrect responses. All feedback variants effectively enhanced students’ error correction in a posttest (i.e., recall on initially incorrect responses) and students across all feedback groups voluntarily spent longer time on elaborated feedback messages after incorrect responses. Yet, the time spent on the feedback messages was not significantly affected by the design features. This pattern of results suggests that students actively processed the negative feedback, independent of its design. However, compared to text-only feedback, only adding a picture improved students’ reported level of positive emotions when the feedback referred to a mistake (i.e., after incorrect responses). Overall, our results indicate that pictures can serve as emotional facilitators and could enhance text-only feedback messages to mitigate a negative affective impact of automated error notifications.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.