了解用户对车辆到电网(V2G)的偏好:潜在类别选择分析

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jerico Bakhuis , Natalia Barbour , Eric Molin , Émile J.L. Chappin
{"title":"了解用户对车辆到电网(V2G)的偏好:潜在类别选择分析","authors":"Jerico Bakhuis ,&nbsp;Natalia Barbour ,&nbsp;Eric Molin ,&nbsp;Émile J.L. Chappin","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The vehicle-to-grid (V2G) innovation—which enables electric vehicles to return stored electricity to the grid—holds significant potential to facilitate the integration of intermittent renewable energy and support climate goals. However, user preferences and how they vary across different user groups remain poorly understood, even though V2G’s success depends on driver participation. This study addresses this gap by conducting a stated choice experiment with 1,018 participants in the Netherlands. Participants chose between hypothetical V2G contracts based on four key attributes: financial compensation, guaranteed driving range, minimum plug-in time, and battery degradation—each varied at three levels. Using a latent class choice model, the analysis identified four distinct user preference profiles (or classes). Overall, guaranteed range and plug-in time were found to outweigh financial incentives for most users. The largest class (43% of users) prioritizes guaranteed range and shows the lowest sensitivity to financial incentives. The second-largest class (29%) also prioritizes guaranteed range, while assigning the least importance to plug-in time. The third class (18%) places the greatest importance on reducing plug-in time, followed by increasing guaranteed range. The smallest class (10%) is primarily motivated by financial compensation. The study further examines how user characteristics—such as socio-demographic, household, car use, and attitude factors—relate to class membership. The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of how these characteristics influence user preferences. These findings offer valuable insights into the diversity of V2G user preferences and inform targeted policy recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding user preferences regarding vehicle-to-grid (V2G): A latent class choice analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jerico Bakhuis ,&nbsp;Natalia Barbour ,&nbsp;Eric Molin ,&nbsp;Émile J.L. Chappin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The vehicle-to-grid (V2G) innovation—which enables electric vehicles to return stored electricity to the grid—holds significant potential to facilitate the integration of intermittent renewable energy and support climate goals. However, user preferences and how they vary across different user groups remain poorly understood, even though V2G’s success depends on driver participation. This study addresses this gap by conducting a stated choice experiment with 1,018 participants in the Netherlands. Participants chose between hypothetical V2G contracts based on four key attributes: financial compensation, guaranteed driving range, minimum plug-in time, and battery degradation—each varied at three levels. Using a latent class choice model, the analysis identified four distinct user preference profiles (or classes). Overall, guaranteed range and plug-in time were found to outweigh financial incentives for most users. The largest class (43% of users) prioritizes guaranteed range and shows the lowest sensitivity to financial incentives. The second-largest class (29%) also prioritizes guaranteed range, while assigning the least importance to plug-in time. The third class (18%) places the greatest importance on reducing plug-in time, followed by increasing guaranteed range. The smallest class (10%) is primarily motivated by financial compensation. The study further examines how user characteristics—such as socio-demographic, household, car use, and attitude factors—relate to class membership. The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of how these characteristics influence user preferences. These findings offer valuable insights into the diversity of V2G user preferences and inform targeted policy recommendations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002381\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汽车到电网(V2G)的创新——使电动汽车能够将储存的电力返回到电网——在促进间歇性可再生能源的整合和支持气候目标方面具有巨大的潜力。然而,尽管V2G的成功取决于驾驶员的参与,但人们对用户偏好及其在不同用户群体中的差异仍然知之甚少。这项研究通过在荷兰对1018名参与者进行陈述选择实验来解决这一差距。参与者根据四个关键属性在假设的V2G合同之间进行选择:经济补偿、保证行驶里程、最短插电时间和电池退化——每个属性在三个层面上有所不同。使用潜在类别选择模型,分析确定了四个不同的用户偏好概况(或类别)。总的来说,对大多数用户来说,保证续航里程和插电时间比经济激励更重要。最大的一类(43%的用户)优先考虑保证范围,对财务激励的敏感度最低。第二大类别(29%)也优先考虑保证续航里程,而对插电时间的重视程度最低。第三类(18%)认为最重要的是减少插电时间,其次是增加保证里程。最小的一类(10%)主要是为了经济补偿。该研究进一步考察了用户特征(如社会人口统计、家庭、汽车使用和态度因素)与阶级成员的关系。该分析提供了这些特征如何影响用户偏好的全面概述。这些发现为了解V2G用户偏好的多样性提供了有价值的见解,并为有针对性的政策建议提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding user preferences regarding vehicle-to-grid (V2G): A latent class choice analysis
The vehicle-to-grid (V2G) innovation—which enables electric vehicles to return stored electricity to the grid—holds significant potential to facilitate the integration of intermittent renewable energy and support climate goals. However, user preferences and how they vary across different user groups remain poorly understood, even though V2G’s success depends on driver participation. This study addresses this gap by conducting a stated choice experiment with 1,018 participants in the Netherlands. Participants chose between hypothetical V2G contracts based on four key attributes: financial compensation, guaranteed driving range, minimum plug-in time, and battery degradation—each varied at three levels. Using a latent class choice model, the analysis identified four distinct user preference profiles (or classes). Overall, guaranteed range and plug-in time were found to outweigh financial incentives for most users. The largest class (43% of users) prioritizes guaranteed range and shows the lowest sensitivity to financial incentives. The second-largest class (29%) also prioritizes guaranteed range, while assigning the least importance to plug-in time. The third class (18%) places the greatest importance on reducing plug-in time, followed by increasing guaranteed range. The smallest class (10%) is primarily motivated by financial compensation. The study further examines how user characteristics—such as socio-demographic, household, car use, and attitude factors—relate to class membership. The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of how these characteristics influence user preferences. These findings offer valuable insights into the diversity of V2G user preferences and inform targeted policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信