{"title":"基于最大一致块的乐观和悲观概率粗糙模糊集及其在三向多属性决策中的应用","authors":"Yan Sun , Bin Pang , Ju-Sheng Mi , Wei-Zhi Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of three-way decision (3WD) into multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problems has emerged as a pivotal research area. 3WD can effectively manage the inherent uncertainty within the decision-making process. Additionally, it offers a semantic interpretation of the outcomes. In this paper, we introduce two innovative 3WD-MADM approaches, with a focus on granule selection and the handling of multi-type information in the framework of three-way decisions. Firstly, we construct maximal consistent blocks (MCBs)-based pessimistic and optimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy set (RFS) models and investigate their properties to ascertain their efficacy and reliability in decision-making contexts. Then, we define relative loss functions associated with “good state” and “bad state” scenarios. Building on this, we introduce four types of 3WDs based on our newly proposed optimistic and pessimistic probabilistic RFSs. Furthermore, we integrate the 3WDs information from both scenarios to formulate optimistic and pessimistic 3WD-MADM approaches, handling both single-valued fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, we contrast our proposed methodologies with the current MADM methods, and demonstrate their validity, significance and generalization ability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 109529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximal consistent blocks-based optimistic and pessimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy sets and their applications in three-way multiple attribute decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Yan Sun , Bin Pang , Ju-Sheng Mi , Wei-Zhi Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The integration of three-way decision (3WD) into multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problems has emerged as a pivotal research area. 3WD can effectively manage the inherent uncertainty within the decision-making process. Additionally, it offers a semantic interpretation of the outcomes. In this paper, we introduce two innovative 3WD-MADM approaches, with a focus on granule selection and the handling of multi-type information in the framework of three-way decisions. Firstly, we construct maximal consistent blocks (MCBs)-based pessimistic and optimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy set (RFS) models and investigate their properties to ascertain their efficacy and reliability in decision-making contexts. Then, we define relative loss functions associated with “good state” and “bad state” scenarios. Building on this, we introduce four types of 3WDs based on our newly proposed optimistic and pessimistic probabilistic RFSs. Furthermore, we integrate the 3WDs information from both scenarios to formulate optimistic and pessimistic 3WD-MADM approaches, handling both single-valued fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, we contrast our proposed methodologies with the current MADM methods, and demonstrate their validity, significance and generalization ability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X25001707\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X25001707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Maximal consistent blocks-based optimistic and pessimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy sets and their applications in three-way multiple attribute decision-making
The integration of three-way decision (3WD) into multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problems has emerged as a pivotal research area. 3WD can effectively manage the inherent uncertainty within the decision-making process. Additionally, it offers a semantic interpretation of the outcomes. In this paper, we introduce two innovative 3WD-MADM approaches, with a focus on granule selection and the handling of multi-type information in the framework of three-way decisions. Firstly, we construct maximal consistent blocks (MCBs)-based pessimistic and optimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy set (RFS) models and investigate their properties to ascertain their efficacy and reliability in decision-making contexts. Then, we define relative loss functions associated with “good state” and “bad state” scenarios. Building on this, we introduce four types of 3WDs based on our newly proposed optimistic and pessimistic probabilistic RFSs. Furthermore, we integrate the 3WDs information from both scenarios to formulate optimistic and pessimistic 3WD-MADM approaches, handling both single-valued fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, we contrast our proposed methodologies with the current MADM methods, and demonstrate their validity, significance and generalization ability.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest.
Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning.
Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.