Johan Nordensvärd , Martin Björklund , Fredrik von Malmborg , Lina La Fleur , Emma Skogsmo , Daniel H.B. Gamez
{"title":"回顾欧盟在能源效率和社会政策方面的政策联系","authors":"Johan Nordensvärd , Martin Björklund , Fredrik von Malmborg , Lina La Fleur , Emma Skogsmo , Daniel H.B. Gamez","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to analyse how the European Union (EU) energy policy has merged social policy concepts with energy efficiency policy. Energy efficiency has increasingly become understood through social policy concepts such as energy poverty, energy inequality, and lack of cohesion. Previous research has shown how the social aspects of energy efficiency have been highlighted by the European Commission when talking about the multiple benefits of energy efficiency increasing efforts, such as renovating buildings. Using a mixed-method approach with material from the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament we review energy policy from a social policy perspective. Our analysis is done in two steps: (i) identifying which of the EU institutions acted as an agenda-setter introducing the social aspects of energy efficiency, and (ii) describing and analysing the framing process of merging social concepts with energy policy. We do this through qualitative and quantitative analysis of EU policy documents. A range of key words are utilized to explore the links between social policy and energy policy as part of the quantitative part of the analysis. We conclude that social aspects are first connected to the energy policy field by the European Parliament. The established connection is then reinforced by the Commission by the inclusion of social policy aspects, mainly in the policy on the transition to energy efficiency and zero-carbon buildings, where concepts such as energy poverty become central.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 116128"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing the EU policy nexus of energy efficiency and social policy\",\"authors\":\"Johan Nordensvärd , Martin Björklund , Fredrik von Malmborg , Lina La Fleur , Emma Skogsmo , Daniel H.B. Gamez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper aims to analyse how the European Union (EU) energy policy has merged social policy concepts with energy efficiency policy. Energy efficiency has increasingly become understood through social policy concepts such as energy poverty, energy inequality, and lack of cohesion. Previous research has shown how the social aspects of energy efficiency have been highlighted by the European Commission when talking about the multiple benefits of energy efficiency increasing efforts, such as renovating buildings. Using a mixed-method approach with material from the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament we review energy policy from a social policy perspective. Our analysis is done in two steps: (i) identifying which of the EU institutions acted as an agenda-setter introducing the social aspects of energy efficiency, and (ii) describing and analysing the framing process of merging social concepts with energy policy. We do this through qualitative and quantitative analysis of EU policy documents. A range of key words are utilized to explore the links between social policy and energy policy as part of the quantitative part of the analysis. We conclude that social aspects are first connected to the energy policy field by the European Parliament. The established connection is then reinforced by the Commission by the inclusion of social policy aspects, mainly in the policy on the transition to energy efficiency and zero-carbon buildings, where concepts such as energy poverty become central.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reviewing the EU policy nexus of energy efficiency and social policy
This paper aims to analyse how the European Union (EU) energy policy has merged social policy concepts with energy efficiency policy. Energy efficiency has increasingly become understood through social policy concepts such as energy poverty, energy inequality, and lack of cohesion. Previous research has shown how the social aspects of energy efficiency have been highlighted by the European Commission when talking about the multiple benefits of energy efficiency increasing efforts, such as renovating buildings. Using a mixed-method approach with material from the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament we review energy policy from a social policy perspective. Our analysis is done in two steps: (i) identifying which of the EU institutions acted as an agenda-setter introducing the social aspects of energy efficiency, and (ii) describing and analysing the framing process of merging social concepts with energy policy. We do this through qualitative and quantitative analysis of EU policy documents. A range of key words are utilized to explore the links between social policy and energy policy as part of the quantitative part of the analysis. We conclude that social aspects are first connected to the energy policy field by the European Parliament. The established connection is then reinforced by the Commission by the inclusion of social policy aspects, mainly in the policy on the transition to energy efficiency and zero-carbon buildings, where concepts such as energy poverty become central.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.