在过度拥挤的监狱中被关押的犯人和闲散人员

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
John Ursino, Abigail Hayes, Baylee Allen-Flores, Zachary Hamilton
{"title":"在过度拥挤的监狱中被关押的犯人和闲散人员","authors":"John Ursino,&nbsp;Abigail Hayes,&nbsp;Baylee Allen-Flores,&nbsp;Zachary Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Correctional systems across the United States continue to face persistent challenges related to overcrowding, limited resources, and the need to balance institutional safety with rehabilitative goals. Most efforts to reduce prison crowding have focused primarily on reducing admissions and expanding early release, often overlooking a critical subgroup: short-timers—individuals who enter prison with less than one year to serve. This study uses administrative data from the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services (NDCS) to examine whether short-timers are systematically excluded from rehabilitative programming—a practice known as warehousing—and how this exclusion influences behavioral outcomes that exacerbate inefficiencies in system processing, ultimately worsening crowding. Results show that short-timers are significantly more likely to be warehoused, even when they are willing to participate in treatment. They also experience higher rates of program withdrawal. Importantly, the combination of short-timer status and warehousing is linked to increased non-serious misconduct, indicating that lack of engagement elevates behavioral risk. These findings highlight the compounded effects of short stays and institutional practices, emphasizing the need for targeted reforms that expand access to programming, reduce misconduct, and support sustainable decarceration efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short timers and idle populations in overcrowded prisons\",\"authors\":\"John Ursino,&nbsp;Abigail Hayes,&nbsp;Baylee Allen-Flores,&nbsp;Zachary Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Correctional systems across the United States continue to face persistent challenges related to overcrowding, limited resources, and the need to balance institutional safety with rehabilitative goals. Most efforts to reduce prison crowding have focused primarily on reducing admissions and expanding early release, often overlooking a critical subgroup: short-timers—individuals who enter prison with less than one year to serve. This study uses administrative data from the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services (NDCS) to examine whether short-timers are systematically excluded from rehabilitative programming—a practice known as warehousing—and how this exclusion influences behavioral outcomes that exacerbate inefficiencies in system processing, ultimately worsening crowding. Results show that short-timers are significantly more likely to be warehoused, even when they are willing to participate in treatment. They also experience higher rates of program withdrawal. Importantly, the combination of short-timer status and warehousing is linked to increased non-serious misconduct, indicating that lack of engagement elevates behavioral risk. These findings highlight the compounded effects of short stays and institutional practices, emphasizing the need for targeted reforms that expand access to programming, reduce misconduct, and support sustainable decarceration efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001291\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的惩教系统继续面临着与过度拥挤、资源有限以及平衡机构安全和康复目标的需要有关的持续挑战。大多数减少监狱拥挤的努力主要集中在减少收押人数和扩大提前释放上,往往忽视了一个关键的亚群体:短期服刑者——那些入狱不到一年的人。本研究使用内布拉斯加州惩教服务部门(NDCS)的行政数据来检验短期服刑者是否被系统地排除在康复计划之外——一种被称为仓储的做法——以及这种排除如何影响行为结果,从而加剧了系统处理的低效率,最终加剧了拥挤。结果显示,即使他们愿意参加治疗,短期就诊者也更有可能被收容。他们也经历了更高的项目退出率。重要的是,短期状态和仓储的结合与增加的非严重不当行为有关,这表明缺乏参与会增加行为风险。这些调查结果突出了短期停留和机构做法的复合影响,强调需要进行有针对性的改革,扩大规划的可及性,减少不当行为,并支持可持续的脱囚工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short timers and idle populations in overcrowded prisons
Correctional systems across the United States continue to face persistent challenges related to overcrowding, limited resources, and the need to balance institutional safety with rehabilitative goals. Most efforts to reduce prison crowding have focused primarily on reducing admissions and expanding early release, often overlooking a critical subgroup: short-timers—individuals who enter prison with less than one year to serve. This study uses administrative data from the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services (NDCS) to examine whether short-timers are systematically excluded from rehabilitative programming—a practice known as warehousing—and how this exclusion influences behavioral outcomes that exacerbate inefficiencies in system processing, ultimately worsening crowding. Results show that short-timers are significantly more likely to be warehoused, even when they are willing to participate in treatment. They also experience higher rates of program withdrawal. Importantly, the combination of short-timer status and warehousing is linked to increased non-serious misconduct, indicating that lack of engagement elevates behavioral risk. These findings highlight the compounded effects of short stays and institutional practices, emphasizing the need for targeted reforms that expand access to programming, reduce misconduct, and support sustainable decarceration efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信