可持续生态友好型公共交通系统的运行策略：使用交通和排放微观模拟模型的比较评价

IF 4.4 2区工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS

Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101452

Hyunwoo Lee , Sangpil Ko , Jun Lee , Jeong Whon Yu

{"title":"可持续生态友好型公共交通系统的运行策略：使用交通和排放微观模拟模型的比较评价","authors":"Hyunwoo Lee , Sangpil Ko , Jun Lee , Jeong Whon Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For carbon neutrality and alleviation of traffic congestion, large cities are considering the eco-friendly public transportation. While many researches have studied on selecting modes suitable for large cities, there is a lack of detailed comparative analysis of various operational strategies for different public transportation modes. It is essential to focus not only on comparing different public transportation modes but also on the operational strategies and methods that can be applied in various ways. This study assesses the sustainability of various operational strategies for eco-friendly modes by using economic, social, and environmental factors, utilizing the integrated approach with VISSIM and VisVAP for accurate simulation and analysis. We propose new public transportation modes and determine the most efficient operational strategies for implementing effective mass transit systems in cities. This methodology is validated by modeling the road conditions of large cities with heavy traffic. The findings indicate that the super BRT<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span> dedicated mode operated in a one-way configuration, combined with various strategies, is superior to trams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101452"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operational strategies for a sustainable eco-friendly public transportation system: A comparative evaluation using traffic and emission microsimulation models\",\"authors\":\"Hyunwoo Lee , Sangpil Ko , Jun Lee , Jeong Whon Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For carbon neutrality and alleviation of traffic congestion, large cities are considering the eco-friendly public transportation. While many researches have studied on selecting modes suitable for large cities, there is a lack of detailed comparative analysis of various operational strategies for different public transportation modes. It is essential to focus not only on comparing different public transportation modes but also on the operational strategies and methods that can be applied in various ways. This study assesses the sustainability of various operational strategies for eco-friendly modes by using economic, social, and environmental factors, utilizing the integrated approach with VISSIM and VisVAP for accurate simulation and analysis. We propose new public transportation modes and determine the most efficient operational strategies for implementing effective mass transit systems in cities. This methodology is validated by modeling the road conditions of large cities with heavy traffic. The findings indicate that the super BRT<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span> dedicated mode operated in a one-way configuration, combined with various strategies, is superior to trams.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了碳中和和缓解交通拥堵，大城市正在考虑环保型公共交通。虽然有很多研究对选择适合大城市的公共交通模式进行了研究，但缺乏对不同公共交通模式的各种运营策略进行详细的比较分析。不仅要把重点放在比较不同的公共交通方式上，而且要放在可以以各种方式应用的运营策略和方法上。本研究通过使用经济、社会和环境因素，利用VISSIM和VisVAP的综合方法进行精确的模拟和分析，评估了生态友好模式的各种运营策略的可持续性。我们提出了新的公共交通模式，并确定了在城市中实施有效的公共交通系统的最有效的运营策略。通过对交通繁忙的大城市道路状况进行建模，验证了该方法的有效性。研究结果表明，在单向配置下，结合多种策略，超级BRT3专用模式优于有轨电车。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Operational strategies for a sustainable eco-friendly public transportation system: A comparative evaluation using traffic and emission microsimulation models

For carbon neutrality and alleviation of traffic congestion, large cities are considering the eco-friendly public transportation. While many researches have studied on selecting modes suitable for large cities, there is a lack of detailed comparative analysis of various operational strategies for different public transportation modes. It is essential to focus not only on comparing different public transportation modes but also on the operational strategies and methods that can be applied in various ways. This study assesses the sustainability of various operational strategies for eco-friendly modes by using economic, social, and environmental factors, utilizing the integrated approach with VISSIM and VisVAP for accurate simulation and analysis. We propose new public transportation modes and determine the most efficient operational strategies for implementing effective mass transit systems in cities. This methodology is validated by modeling the road conditions of large cities with heavy traffic. The findings indicate that the super BRT³ dedicated mode operated in a one-way configuration, combined with various strategies, is superior to trams.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Research in Transportation Business and Management Multiple-

CiteScore

7.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

175

期刊介绍： Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector