{"title":"南非人群中肺炎克雷伯菌抗菌素耐药性的流行:监测研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sinethemba H. Yakobi, Uchechukwu U. Nwodo","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, with <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> emerging as a high-priority pathogen due to escalating resistance rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the AMR profiles of <i>K. pneumoniae</i> isolates from South Africa, a resource-limited setting where AMR burdens remain understudied. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2000 to June 2024) identified studies reporting resistance data. Nineteen studies comprising 9402 isolates were included, and data were analyzed using random-effects models. Pooled resistance prevalence was highest for amoxicillin (69.3%; 95% CI: 64.1%–74.1%), followed by second-generation cephalosporins (70.9%; 95% CI: 65.3%–75.8%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57.8%; 95% CI: 52.4%–63.0%), and carbapenems, with imipenem resistance at 33.2% (95% CI: 28.5%–38.3%). Significant heterogeneity was observed (<i>I²</i> > 90%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), likely due to differences in study populations such as clinical versus environmental isolates, and regional prescribing practices. Publication bias was detected (Egger's test: <i>p</i> = 1.45 × 10⁻¹⁴), indicating possible underreporting of small-scale studies with null findings. These findings highlight alarming resistance rates to first-line antibiotics in South Africa and underscore the urgent need for multisectoral interventions. Priority actions should include standardized AMR surveillance to harmonize data collection, expanded antimicrobial stewardship programs particularly in high-resistance settings such as hospitals, and greater investment in novel therapies targeting carbapenem-resistant strains. Addressing methodological heterogeneity and minimizing publication bias in future research will be critical to strengthening the evidence base for informed policymaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae in the South African Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surveillance Studies\",\"authors\":\"Sinethemba H. Yakobi, Uchechukwu U. Nwodo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mbo3.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, with <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> emerging as a high-priority pathogen due to escalating resistance rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the AMR profiles of <i>K. pneumoniae</i> isolates from South Africa, a resource-limited setting where AMR burdens remain understudied. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2000 to June 2024) identified studies reporting resistance data. Nineteen studies comprising 9402 isolates were included, and data were analyzed using random-effects models. Pooled resistance prevalence was highest for amoxicillin (69.3%; 95% CI: 64.1%–74.1%), followed by second-generation cephalosporins (70.9%; 95% CI: 65.3%–75.8%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57.8%; 95% CI: 52.4%–63.0%), and carbapenems, with imipenem resistance at 33.2% (95% CI: 28.5%–38.3%). Significant heterogeneity was observed (<i>I²</i> > 90%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), likely due to differences in study populations such as clinical versus environmental isolates, and regional prescribing practices. Publication bias was detected (Egger's test: <i>p</i> = 1.45 × 10⁻¹⁴), indicating possible underreporting of small-scale studies with null findings. These findings highlight alarming resistance rates to first-line antibiotics in South Africa and underscore the urgent need for multisectoral interventions. Priority actions should include standardized AMR surveillance to harmonize data collection, expanded antimicrobial stewardship programs particularly in high-resistance settings such as hospitals, and greater investment in novel therapies targeting carbapenem-resistant strains. Addressing methodological heterogeneity and minimizing publication bias in future research will be critical to strengthening the evidence base for informed policymaking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MicrobiologyOpen\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70037\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MicrobiologyOpen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)构成了严重的全球健康威胁,肺炎克雷伯菌由于耐药率不断上升而成为高度优先考虑的病原体。该系统综述和荟萃分析评估了来自南非的肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的抗菌素耐药性概况,这是一个资源有限的环境,抗菌素耐药性负担仍未得到充分研究。对PubMed、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar(2000年1月至2024年6月)的综合搜索确定了报告耐药性数据的研究。纳入19项研究,共9402株,采用随机效应模型对数据进行分析。阿莫西林总耐药率最高(69.3%;95% CI: 64.1%-74.1%),其次是第二代头孢菌素(70.9%;95% CI: 65.3%-75.8%),甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(57.8%;95% CI: 52.4%-63.0%)和碳青霉烯类,亚胺培南耐药性为33.2% (95% CI: 28.5%-38.3%)。观察到显著的异质性(I²> 90%, p < 0.001),可能是由于研究人群的差异,如临床与环境分离株,以及区域处方实践。发现了发表偏倚(埃格检验:p = 1.45 × 10⁻¹⁴),表明小规模研究的无效结果可能被少报。这些发现突出了南非对一线抗生素的耐药率令人震惊,并强调了迫切需要采取多部门干预措施。优先行动应包括标准化抗菌素耐药性监测以协调数据收集,扩大抗菌素管理计划,特别是在医院等高耐药性环境中,以及加大对针对碳青霉烯耐药菌株的新疗法的投资。在未来的研究中,解决方法异质性和尽量减少发表偏倚对于加强知情决策的证据基础至关重要。
Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae in the South African Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surveillance Studies
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, with Klebsiella pneumoniae emerging as a high-priority pathogen due to escalating resistance rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the AMR profiles of K. pneumoniae isolates from South Africa, a resource-limited setting where AMR burdens remain understudied. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2000 to June 2024) identified studies reporting resistance data. Nineteen studies comprising 9402 isolates were included, and data were analyzed using random-effects models. Pooled resistance prevalence was highest for amoxicillin (69.3%; 95% CI: 64.1%–74.1%), followed by second-generation cephalosporins (70.9%; 95% CI: 65.3%–75.8%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57.8%; 95% CI: 52.4%–63.0%), and carbapenems, with imipenem resistance at 33.2% (95% CI: 28.5%–38.3%). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I² > 90%, p < 0.001), likely due to differences in study populations such as clinical versus environmental isolates, and regional prescribing practices. Publication bias was detected (Egger's test: p = 1.45 × 10⁻¹⁴), indicating possible underreporting of small-scale studies with null findings. These findings highlight alarming resistance rates to first-line antibiotics in South Africa and underscore the urgent need for multisectoral interventions. Priority actions should include standardized AMR surveillance to harmonize data collection, expanded antimicrobial stewardship programs particularly in high-resistance settings such as hospitals, and greater investment in novel therapies targeting carbapenem-resistant strains. Addressing methodological heterogeneity and minimizing publication bias in future research will be critical to strengthening the evidence base for informed policymaking.
期刊介绍:
MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era.
The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes.
MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to:
- agriculture
- antimicrobial resistance
- astrobiology
- biochemistry
- biotechnology
- cell and molecular biology
- clinical microbiology
- computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology
- environmental science
- evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics
- food science and technology
- genetics and genomics
- geobiology and earth science
- host-microbe interactions
- infectious diseases
- natural products discovery
- pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry
- physiology
- plant pathology
- veterinary microbiology
We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses.
The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations.
MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.