Nicholas Kaitschuck, JohnPeter Bekker, Derek Haas, Sheldon Landsberger
{"title":"环境放射性测量中中子活化分析与被动计数的比较","authors":"Nicholas Kaitschuck, JohnPeter Bekker, Derek Haas, Sheldon Landsberger","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neutron activation analysis is not usually known used for environmental radioactivity measurements as compared to low-level passive gamma-ray counting. Texas local background samples were taken as part of a study to compare neutron activation versus passive counting. The benefits and drawbacks of each method are explored for soil samples which are in secular equilibrium, including gamma-ray self-attenuation, sample size and counting times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","volume":"289 ","pages":"Article 107766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of neutron activation analysis and passive counting for environmental radioactivity measurements\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Kaitschuck, JohnPeter Bekker, Derek Haas, Sheldon Landsberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Neutron activation analysis is not usually known used for environmental radioactivity measurements as compared to low-level passive gamma-ray counting. Texas local background samples were taken as part of a study to compare neutron activation versus passive counting. The benefits and drawbacks of each method are explored for soil samples which are in secular equilibrium, including gamma-ray self-attenuation, sample size and counting times.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"volume\":\"289 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25001535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25001535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of neutron activation analysis and passive counting for environmental radioactivity measurements
Neutron activation analysis is not usually known used for environmental radioactivity measurements as compared to low-level passive gamma-ray counting. Texas local background samples were taken as part of a study to compare neutron activation versus passive counting. The benefits and drawbacks of each method are explored for soil samples which are in secular equilibrium, including gamma-ray self-attenuation, sample size and counting times.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Radioactivity provides a coherent international forum for publication of original research or review papers on any aspect of the occurrence of radioactivity in natural systems.
Relevant subject areas range from applications of environmental radionuclides as mechanistic or timescale tracers of natural processes to assessments of the radioecological or radiological effects of ambient radioactivity. Papers deal with naturally occurring nuclides or with those created and released by man through nuclear weapons manufacture and testing, energy production, fuel-cycle technology, etc. Reports on radioactivity in the oceans, sediments, rivers, lakes, groundwaters, soils, atmosphere and all divisions of the biosphere are welcomed, but these should not simply be of a monitoring nature unless the data are particularly innovative.