学习未来意识:一个综合回顾

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Merlijn J. Koch , Anneke M. Sools , Godelieve H.J. Spaas , Gerben J. Westerhof
{"title":"学习未来意识:一个综合回顾","authors":"Merlijn J. Koch ,&nbsp;Anneke M. Sools ,&nbsp;Godelieve H.J. Spaas ,&nbsp;Gerben J. Westerhof","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as \"Concern for Others,\" limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Futures Consciousness: An integrative review\",\"authors\":\"Merlijn J. Koch ,&nbsp;Anneke M. Sools ,&nbsp;Godelieve H.J. Spaas ,&nbsp;Gerben J. Westerhof\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as \\\"Concern for Others,\\\" limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对未来教育的相关文献进行综述,以分析和综合关于学习未来意识(FC)的零散知识,即对可能的未来进行设想和批判性反思的能力。作为应对复杂社会挑战的基本能力,金融服务还能增强个人能动性、福祉和集体参与度。使用3-P模型,该框架系统地分析了语境(preage)、过程(Process)和结果相关(Product)因素如何在正式和非正式教育环境中塑造FC的发展。研究结果揭示了未来教育研究中的关键差距,包括对FC维度的代表性不足,例如“关心他人”,对情境影响的理解有限,以及缺乏对学习过程中遇到的挑战的系统评估。此外,教育者的角色和不同学习者背景的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究强调了未来研究明确干预背景、目标、参与者多样性、学习过程和持续时间的必要性。本研究的框架为未来教育的研究、教育设计和评估提供了一个视角。通过强调关键的差距和需要改进的领域,促进有意义的学习FC交流,它促进了更有效的教育项目的发展,使个人能够应对不确定性,推动有意义的社会转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Futures Consciousness: An integrative review
This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as "Concern for Others," limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信