Merlijn J. Koch , Anneke M. Sools , Godelieve H.J. Spaas , Gerben J. Westerhof
{"title":"学习未来意识:一个综合回顾","authors":"Merlijn J. Koch , Anneke M. Sools , Godelieve H.J. Spaas , Gerben J. Westerhof","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as \"Concern for Others,\" limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Futures Consciousness: An integrative review\",\"authors\":\"Merlijn J. Koch , Anneke M. Sools , Godelieve H.J. Spaas , Gerben J. Westerhof\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as \\\"Concern for Others,\\\" limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning Futures Consciousness: An integrative review
This study presents an integrative literature review of Futures Education to analyze and synthesize fragmented knowledge on learning Futures Consciousness (FC)—the capability to envision and critically reflect on possible futures. As an essential competency for addressing complex societal challenges, FC also enhances individual agency, well-being, and collective engagement. Using the 3-P model, the framework systematically analyzes how contextual (Presage), processual (Process), and outcome-related (Product) factors shape the development of FC in formal and informal educational settings. The findings reveal critical gaps in Futures Education research, including the underrepresentation of dimensions of FC, such as "Concern for Others," limited understanding of contextual influences, and the lack of systematic evaluation of challenges encountered in the learning process. Additionally, the roles of educators and the impact of diverse learner backgrounds remain underexplored. This study highlights the need for future research to clearly define intervention contexts, goals, participant diversity, learning processes, and durations. The framework of this study serves as a lens for advancing research, educational design, and evaluation in Futures Education. By highlighting critical gaps and areas for improvement and fostering meaningful exchange on learning FC, it facilitates the development of more effective educational programs, equipping individuals to navigate uncertainty and drive meaningful societal transformation.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures