武夷山国家公园生态完整性评价体系

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xinyue Fan , Zhenhua Zang , Jun Tang , Lei Zhao , Weihua Xu , Zhiyun Ouyang
{"title":"武夷山国家公园生态完整性评价体系","authors":"Xinyue Fan ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Zang ,&nbsp;Jun Tang ,&nbsp;Lei Zhao ,&nbsp;Weihua Xu ,&nbsp;Zhiyun Ouyang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological integrity assessment system for Wuyishan national park\",\"authors\":\"Xinyue Fan ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Zang ,&nbsp;Jun Tang ,&nbsp;Lei Zhao ,&nbsp;Weihua Xu ,&nbsp;Zhiyun Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25008404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25008404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护生态完整性是许多国家公园建立的首要目标之一。准确评价生态完整性对于评价国家公园边界的合理性和管理措施的有效性至关重要。然而,对中国国家公园生态完整性的研究还很有限。本研究立足于中国国家公园生态系统的内在特征和管理需求,基于“模式-结构-功能”框架,选取了8个二级指标和10个三级指标。所有指标都使用数学模型进行量化,以确保可靠的评估和分析。以武夷山国家公园为例,其生态完整性指数为0.74。值得注意的是,自然生态系统面积比例、边界指数、自然遗产与景观完整性指数、生态系统功能指数和食物链完整性指数得分较高,而人工斑块密度(含天窗)、代表性生态系统类型比例、代表性生态系统最大斑块面积比例、物种丰富度比例和旗舰物种栖息地连通性得分较低。针对这些发现的问题,提出以下对策:1)严格控制并逐步淘汰公园内的人工用地,因地制宜实施生态修复;2)构建生境廊道,提升整体连通性;3)优化武夷山国家公园边界,提升公园生物多样性覆盖度和代表性生态系统;4)建立长期监测体系,跟踪重点保护目标的变化,为国家公园生态完整性评价提供科学支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological integrity assessment system for Wuyishan national park
Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信