Xinyue Fan , Zhenhua Zang , Jun Tang , Lei Zhao , Weihua Xu , Zhiyun Ouyang
{"title":"武夷山国家公园生态完整性评价体系","authors":"Xinyue Fan , Zhenhua Zang , Jun Tang , Lei Zhao , Weihua Xu , Zhiyun Ouyang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological integrity assessment system for Wuyishan national park\",\"authors\":\"Xinyue Fan , Zhenhua Zang , Jun Tang , Lei Zhao , Weihua Xu , Zhiyun Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25008404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25008404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ecological integrity assessment system for Wuyishan national park
Protecting ecological integrity is one of the primary objectives in the establishment of many national parks. Accurately assessing ecological integrity is vital for evaluating the rationality of national park boundaries and the effectiveness of management practices. However, research on ecological integrity within the context of Chinese national parks remains limited. This study, grounded in the inherent characteristics of ecosystems and the management needs of China’s national parks, selects eight secondary indicators and ten tertiary indicators based on the “pattern-structure-function” framework. All indicators are quantified using a mathematical model to ensure robust assessment and analysis. Wuyishan National Park has been selected as a case study, yielding an ecological integrity index of 0.74. Notably, scores for the proportion of natural ecosystems area, boundary index, natural heritage and landscape Integrity Index, ecosystem functioning index, and food chain integrity index were relatively high, Conversely, scores for artificial patch density (including skylight), proportion of representative ecosystem types, proportion of the largest patch area of representative ecosystems, proportion of species richness and habitat connectivity of flagship species were comparatively low. In response to these identified issues, the following strategies are proposed: 1) Strictly control and gradually phase out artificial land use within the park, implement ecological restoration tailored to local conditions; 2) construct habitat corridors to improve overall connectivity; 3) Optimize the boundary of Wuyishan National Park to enhance its biodiversity coverage and representative ecosystems; 4) Establish a long-term monitoring system to track changes in key conservation targets, thereby providing scientific support for ecological integrity assessments in national parks.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.