{"title":"印度5-80岁人群中XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位COVID-19疫苗加强剂的安全性和免疫原性:一项3期单盲随机对照试验","authors":"Subhash Thuluva , Vikram Paradkar , SubbaReddy Gunneri , Rammohan Reddy Mogulla , Vijay Yerroju , Chirag Dhar , Siddalingaiah Ningaiah , Mallikarjuna Panchakshari , Chandrashekhar S. Gillurkar , Manish Narang , Shivnitwar Sachin Kisan , A. Venkateshwar Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve with recent variants such as the omicron sub-variants potentially exhibiting increased transmissibility. Of note, the XBB.1.5 variant has been associated with vaccine-breakthrough cases. We utilised the same platform previously used to develop CORBEVAX™, an ancestral Wuhan strain COVID-19 RBD subunit vaccine, to now develop an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine compared to an ancestral Wuhan strain RBD subunit vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial was conducted in participants aged 5–80 years. Participants who had not received any other approved COVID-19 vaccine within the last 6 months were enrolled and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive two booster doses of either the test vaccine or the control vaccine. The vaccines were administered on Day 0 and Day 28 with immunogenicity assessments on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. Safety assessments included the collection of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) up to Day 56. The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate immunogenic superiority of the test vaccine booster series compared to the control vaccine series. This superiority objective was to be met if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the anti-XBB.1.5.RBD neutralising antibody (nAb) geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of test: control was >1.0 on either Day 28 or Day 42. Given the emergence of JN.1 as the prevalent SARS-CoV-2 strain during the conduct of this study, Day 42 anti-JN.1 nAb levels were measured in a <em>post hoc</em> immunogenicity assessment. In addition, anti-XBB.1.5 RBD protein IgG concentrations were also measured by ELISA on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. The trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry–India as CTRI/2024/01/061423.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 360 participants (32.8% female) were enrolled and randomised across seven sites in India. The nAb GMT ratio of test: control participants was 2.08 (95% CI 1.64–2.63) on Day 28 and 2.91 (95% CI 2.38–3.56) on Day 42. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of neutralising antibodies (nAb) was 7.637 (95% CI 6.090–9.578) on Day 28 and 17.02 (95% CI 13.79–21.01) on Day 42 in the test booster series arm. The nAb GMFRs in the control booster series arm at the same time points were 3.033 (95% CI 2.340–3.932) and 4.824 (95% CI 3.731–6.236), respectively. <em>Post hoc</em> analyses revealed an nAb GMT ratio of 1.90 (95% CI 1.56–2.31) for test: control against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. The safety profile of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be very similar to that of the ancestral strain vaccine with 59 AEs (about 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) and 27 AEs (a little less than 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) respectively during the study. No serious AEs or AEs of special interest were reported in either the test or control arm of the study. Two cases of pyrexia required medical attention, one in each arm.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be both safe and robustly immunogenic when administered as a two-dose booster series in individuals aged 5–80 years. In particular, the vaccine induced a significant rise in neutralising antibodies against the XBB.1.5 strain as well as cross-protective neutralising antibodies against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. These data are in line with studies of other XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccines and support a positive risk-benefit profile. Real-world studies may provide additional evidence about the effectiveness of this new updated vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Biological E Limited</span>, India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100642"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and immunogenicity of booster doses of an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit COVID-19 vaccine among individuals aged 5–80 years in India: a phase 3, single-blind, randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Subhash Thuluva , Vikram Paradkar , SubbaReddy Gunneri , Rammohan Reddy Mogulla , Vijay Yerroju , Chirag Dhar , Siddalingaiah Ningaiah , Mallikarjuna Panchakshari , Chandrashekhar S. Gillurkar , Manish Narang , Shivnitwar Sachin Kisan , A. Venkateshwar Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve with recent variants such as the omicron sub-variants potentially exhibiting increased transmissibility. Of note, the XBB.1.5 variant has been associated with vaccine-breakthrough cases. We utilised the same platform previously used to develop CORBEVAX™, an ancestral Wuhan strain COVID-19 RBD subunit vaccine, to now develop an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine compared to an ancestral Wuhan strain RBD subunit vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial was conducted in participants aged 5–80 years. Participants who had not received any other approved COVID-19 vaccine within the last 6 months were enrolled and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive two booster doses of either the test vaccine or the control vaccine. The vaccines were administered on Day 0 and Day 28 with immunogenicity assessments on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. Safety assessments included the collection of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) up to Day 56. The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate immunogenic superiority of the test vaccine booster series compared to the control vaccine series. This superiority objective was to be met if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the anti-XBB.1.5.RBD neutralising antibody (nAb) geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of test: control was >1.0 on either Day 28 or Day 42. Given the emergence of JN.1 as the prevalent SARS-CoV-2 strain during the conduct of this study, Day 42 anti-JN.1 nAb levels were measured in a <em>post hoc</em> immunogenicity assessment. In addition, anti-XBB.1.5 RBD protein IgG concentrations were also measured by ELISA on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. The trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry–India as CTRI/2024/01/061423.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 360 participants (32.8% female) were enrolled and randomised across seven sites in India. The nAb GMT ratio of test: control participants was 2.08 (95% CI 1.64–2.63) on Day 28 and 2.91 (95% CI 2.38–3.56) on Day 42. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of neutralising antibodies (nAb) was 7.637 (95% CI 6.090–9.578) on Day 28 and 17.02 (95% CI 13.79–21.01) on Day 42 in the test booster series arm. The nAb GMFRs in the control booster series arm at the same time points were 3.033 (95% CI 2.340–3.932) and 4.824 (95% CI 3.731–6.236), respectively. <em>Post hoc</em> analyses revealed an nAb GMT ratio of 1.90 (95% CI 1.56–2.31) for test: control against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. The safety profile of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be very similar to that of the ancestral strain vaccine with 59 AEs (about 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) and 27 AEs (a little less than 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) respectively during the study. No serious AEs or AEs of special interest were reported in either the test or control arm of the study. Two cases of pyrexia required medical attention, one in each arm.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be both safe and robustly immunogenic when administered as a two-dose booster series in individuals aged 5–80 years. In particular, the vaccine induced a significant rise in neutralising antibodies against the XBB.1.5 strain as well as cross-protective neutralising antibodies against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. These data are in line with studies of other XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccines and support a positive risk-benefit profile. Real-world studies may provide additional evidence about the effectiveness of this new updated vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Biological E Limited</span>, India.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368225001131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368225001131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
SARS-CoV-2病毒继续进化,最近的变体,如组粒亚变体,可能表现出更高的传播性。值得注意的是,XBB.1.5变异与疫苗突破病例有关。我们利用先前用于开发祖先武汉株COVID-19 RBD亚单位疫苗CORBEVAX™的相同平台,现在开发了XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位疫苗。我们对新型XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位疫苗的安全性和免疫原性进行了比较。方法本研究为前瞻性、单盲、3期随机对照试验,受试者年龄为5-80岁。在过去6个月内未接种任何其他批准的COVID-19疫苗的参与者被纳入研究,并按2:1的比例随机分配,接受两剂强化疫苗,一剂是试验疫苗,一剂是对照疫苗。在第0天和第28天接种疫苗,并在第0天、第28天和第42天进行免疫原性评估。安全性评估包括收集截至第56天的主动和非主动不良事件(ae)。该研究的主要目的是证明与对照疫苗系列相比,试验疫苗增强系列具有免疫原性优势。如果抗xbb的双侧95% CI下限为1.5,则可以满足这一优势目标。在第28天和第42天,RBD中和抗体(nAb)几何平均滴度(GMT)比为1.0。鉴于在本研究期间出现了流行的SARS-CoV-2毒株JN.1,第42天抗jn。在事后免疫原性评估中测量nAb水平。另外,在第0天、第28天、第42天用ELISA法检测抗xbb .1.5 RBD蛋白IgG浓度。该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心注册为CTRI/ 20124/01/061423。在印度的7个地点,共有360名参与者(32.8%为女性)被随机招募。试验与对照受试者的nAb / GMT比值在第28天为2.08 (95% CI 1.64-2.63),在第42天为2.91 (95% CI 2.38-3.56)。中和抗体(nAb)的几何平均倍数上升(GMFR)在第28天为7.637 (95% CI 6.090-9.578),在第42天为17.02 (95% CI 13.79-21.01)。在同一时间点,对照组增强组的nAb gmfr分别为3.033 (95% CI 2.340-3.932)和4.824 (95% CI 3.731-6.236)。事后分析显示,nAb - GMT比值为1.90 (95% CI为1.56-2.31),用于测试:对照jn1 SARS-CoV-2菌株。研究发现,新的XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位疫苗的安全性与祖先株疫苗非常相似,分别有59个AE(每8次给药约1个AE)和27个AE(每8次给药略低于1个AE)。在研究的试验组和对照组中均未报告严重的不良反应或特殊的不良反应。两例发热需要就医,每只手臂各一例。新的XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位疫苗被发现在5-80岁的个体中作为两剂加强系列接种时既安全又具有强大的免疫原性。特别是,该疫苗诱导了针对XBB.1.5菌株的中和抗体以及针对JN.1 SARS-CoV-2菌株的交叉保护性中和抗体的显著增加。这些数据与对其他XBB.1.5单价疫苗的研究一致,并支持积极的风险-收益概况。现实世界的研究可能为这种新的更新疫苗的有效性提供额外的证据。FundingBiological Limited,印度。
Safety and immunogenicity of booster doses of an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit COVID-19 vaccine among individuals aged 5–80 years in India: a phase 3, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
Background
The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve with recent variants such as the omicron sub-variants potentially exhibiting increased transmissibility. Of note, the XBB.1.5 variant has been associated with vaccine-breakthrough cases. We utilised the same platform previously used to develop CORBEVAX™, an ancestral Wuhan strain COVID-19 RBD subunit vaccine, to now develop an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine compared to an ancestral Wuhan strain RBD subunit vaccine.
Methods
This prospective, single-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial was conducted in participants aged 5–80 years. Participants who had not received any other approved COVID-19 vaccine within the last 6 months were enrolled and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive two booster doses of either the test vaccine or the control vaccine. The vaccines were administered on Day 0 and Day 28 with immunogenicity assessments on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. Safety assessments included the collection of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) up to Day 56. The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate immunogenic superiority of the test vaccine booster series compared to the control vaccine series. This superiority objective was to be met if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the anti-XBB.1.5.RBD neutralising antibody (nAb) geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of test: control was >1.0 on either Day 28 or Day 42. Given the emergence of JN.1 as the prevalent SARS-CoV-2 strain during the conduct of this study, Day 42 anti-JN.1 nAb levels were measured in a post hoc immunogenicity assessment. In addition, anti-XBB.1.5 RBD protein IgG concentrations were also measured by ELISA on Day 0, Day 28, and Day 42. The trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry–India as CTRI/2024/01/061423.
Findings
A total of 360 participants (32.8% female) were enrolled and randomised across seven sites in India. The nAb GMT ratio of test: control participants was 2.08 (95% CI 1.64–2.63) on Day 28 and 2.91 (95% CI 2.38–3.56) on Day 42. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of neutralising antibodies (nAb) was 7.637 (95% CI 6.090–9.578) on Day 28 and 17.02 (95% CI 13.79–21.01) on Day 42 in the test booster series arm. The nAb GMFRs in the control booster series arm at the same time points were 3.033 (95% CI 2.340–3.932) and 4.824 (95% CI 3.731–6.236), respectively. Post hoc analyses revealed an nAb GMT ratio of 1.90 (95% CI 1.56–2.31) for test: control against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. The safety profile of the new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be very similar to that of the ancestral strain vaccine with 59 AEs (about 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) and 27 AEs (a little less than 1 AE for every 8 doses administered) respectively during the study. No serious AEs or AEs of special interest were reported in either the test or control arm of the study. Two cases of pyrexia required medical attention, one in each arm.
Interpretation
The new XBB.1.5 RBD subunit vaccine was found to be both safe and robustly immunogenic when administered as a two-dose booster series in individuals aged 5–80 years. In particular, the vaccine induced a significant rise in neutralising antibodies against the XBB.1.5 strain as well as cross-protective neutralising antibodies against the JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 strain. These data are in line with studies of other XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccines and support a positive risk-benefit profile. Real-world studies may provide additional evidence about the effectiveness of this new updated vaccine.