Qinran Liu,Daniel Wiese,Paulo S Pinheiro,Jordan Baeker Bispo,Margaret Gates Kuliszewski,Tabassum Z Insaf,Kevin A Henry,Ahmedin Jemal,Farhad Islami
{"title":"种族经济隔离与纽约市3种可筛查癌症诊断阶段之间的关系","authors":"Qinran Liu,Daniel Wiese,Paulo S Pinheiro,Jordan Baeker Bispo,Margaret Gates Kuliszewski,Tabassum Z Insaf,Kevin A Henry,Ahmedin Jemal,Farhad Islami","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRacial and economic segregation can create barriers to timely cancer diagnosis and adversely affect survival. This study examines the association between neighborhood-level segregation, measured by the neighborhood-Index of Concentration at Extremes (n-ICE), and stage at diagnosis (advanced [regional/distant] vs localized) for three screenable cancers in New York City.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe analyzed 98,449 incident cases (breast, 58,970; cervical, 4,790; colorectal, 34,689) using New York State Cancer Registry data (2008-2019). Census tract-level n-ICE measures of racial and/or income-based economic segregation were calculated. Age-adjusted stage-specific incidence rates and advanced-to-localized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured across n-ICE quartiles.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAdvanced-to-localized stage IRRs were significantly higher in the most-deprived and/or non-Hispanic Black (NHB)-concentrated areas (Q1) than the most-affluent and/or most non-Hispanic White (NHW)-concentrated areas (Q4) for breast and cervical cancer (breast: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=0.71 vs IRRQ4=0.48; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=0.75 vs IRRQ4=0.53; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=0.74 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=1.30 vs IRRQ4=0.97; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=1.44 vs IRRQ4=0.99; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=1.37 vs IRRQ4=0.92) (all P-values<.01). Hispanic concentration alone (n-ICEHispanic) was not associated with disparities, but combined with economic deprivation was (breast: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=0.70 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=1.31 vs IRRQ4=0.93) (all P-values<.01). All racialized-economic segregation measures (n-ICENHB+Income/n-ICEHispanic+Income) showed increasing IRRs with higher segregation for both cancers (all P-trend<.04). No disparities were observed for colorectal cancer.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nRacialized-economic segregation in New York City was associated with higher advanced-stage diagnoses of breast and cervical cancer but not colorectal cancer. These findings may partially reflect both structural barriers that delay timely diagnosis and the impact of local equity-driven initiatives that broaden colorectal cancer screening access.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between racialized economic segregation and stage at diagnosis for 3 screenable cancers in New York City.\",\"authors\":\"Qinran Liu,Daniel Wiese,Paulo S Pinheiro,Jordan Baeker Bispo,Margaret Gates Kuliszewski,Tabassum Z Insaf,Kevin A Henry,Ahmedin Jemal,Farhad Islami\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nRacial and economic segregation can create barriers to timely cancer diagnosis and adversely affect survival. This study examines the association between neighborhood-level segregation, measured by the neighborhood-Index of Concentration at Extremes (n-ICE), and stage at diagnosis (advanced [regional/distant] vs localized) for three screenable cancers in New York City.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe analyzed 98,449 incident cases (breast, 58,970; cervical, 4,790; colorectal, 34,689) using New York State Cancer Registry data (2008-2019). Census tract-level n-ICE measures of racial and/or income-based economic segregation were calculated. Age-adjusted stage-specific incidence rates and advanced-to-localized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured across n-ICE quartiles.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAdvanced-to-localized stage IRRs were significantly higher in the most-deprived and/or non-Hispanic Black (NHB)-concentrated areas (Q1) than the most-affluent and/or most non-Hispanic White (NHW)-concentrated areas (Q4) for breast and cervical cancer (breast: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=0.71 vs IRRQ4=0.48; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=0.75 vs IRRQ4=0.53; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=0.74 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=1.30 vs IRRQ4=0.97; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=1.44 vs IRRQ4=0.99; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=1.37 vs IRRQ4=0.92) (all P-values<.01). Hispanic concentration alone (n-ICEHispanic) was not associated with disparities, but combined with economic deprivation was (breast: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=0.70 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=1.31 vs IRRQ4=0.93) (all P-values<.01). All racialized-economic segregation measures (n-ICENHB+Income/n-ICEHispanic+Income) showed increasing IRRs with higher segregation for both cancers (all P-trend<.04). No disparities were observed for colorectal cancer.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nRacialized-economic segregation in New York City was associated with higher advanced-stage diagnoses of breast and cervical cancer but not colorectal cancer. These findings may partially reflect both structural barriers that delay timely diagnosis and the impact of local equity-driven initiatives that broaden colorectal cancer screening access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:种族和经济隔离会造成癌症及时诊断的障碍,并对生存产生不利影响。本研究考察了纽约市三种可筛查癌症的社区水平隔离(由社区极端浓度指数(n-ICE)衡量)与诊断阶段(晚期[区域/远处]与局部)之间的关系。方法我们分析了98,449例病例(乳腺,58,970例;颈,4790;结直肠癌,34,689例),使用纽约州癌症登记处的数据(2008-2019)。计算了人口普查区一级的种族和/或基于收入的经济隔离的n-ICE措施。在n-ICE四分位数中测量年龄调整后的分期特异性发病率和晚期-局部发病率比(IRRs)。结果乳腺癌和宫颈癌在最贫困和/或非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)集中地区(Q1)的晚期至局部期IRRs显著高于最富裕和/或非西班牙裔白人(NHW)集中地区(Q4)(乳腺癌:n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=0.71 vs IRRQ4=0.48;n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=0.75 vs IRRQ4=0.53;n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=0.74 vs IRRQ4=0.47;宫颈:n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=1.30 vs IRRQ4=0.97;n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=1.44 vs IRRQ4=0.99;n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=1.37 vs IRRQ4=0.92)(所有p值< 0.01)。西班牙裔集中单独(n- ice - Hispanic)与差异无关,但与经济剥夺相结合(乳房:n- ice - Hispanic+收入,IRRQ1=0.70 vs IRRQ4=0.47;宫颈:n- ice - hispanic +Income, IRRQ1=1.31 vs IRRQ4=0.93) (p值均< 0.01)。所有种族经济隔离措施(n-ICENHB+Income/n- ice - hispanic +Income)显示,两种癌症的irr随着隔离程度的提高而增加(p趋势均<.04)。在结直肠癌中没有观察到差异。结论纽约市的种族经济隔离与乳腺癌和宫颈癌的晚期诊断率相关,但与结直肠癌无关。这些发现可能部分反映了延迟及时诊断的结构性障碍和地方公平驱动的扩大结直肠癌筛查机会的举措的影响。
Association between racialized economic segregation and stage at diagnosis for 3 screenable cancers in New York City.
BACKGROUND
Racial and economic segregation can create barriers to timely cancer diagnosis and adversely affect survival. This study examines the association between neighborhood-level segregation, measured by the neighborhood-Index of Concentration at Extremes (n-ICE), and stage at diagnosis (advanced [regional/distant] vs localized) for three screenable cancers in New York City.
METHODS
We analyzed 98,449 incident cases (breast, 58,970; cervical, 4,790; colorectal, 34,689) using New York State Cancer Registry data (2008-2019). Census tract-level n-ICE measures of racial and/or income-based economic segregation were calculated. Age-adjusted stage-specific incidence rates and advanced-to-localized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured across n-ICE quartiles.
RESULTS
Advanced-to-localized stage IRRs were significantly higher in the most-deprived and/or non-Hispanic Black (NHB)-concentrated areas (Q1) than the most-affluent and/or most non-Hispanic White (NHW)-concentrated areas (Q4) for breast and cervical cancer (breast: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=0.71 vs IRRQ4=0.48; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=0.75 vs IRRQ4=0.53; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=0.74 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEIncome, IRRQ1=1.30 vs IRRQ4=0.97; n-ICENHB, IRRQ1=1.44 vs IRRQ4=0.99; n-ICENHB+Income, IRRQ1=1.37 vs IRRQ4=0.92) (all P-values<.01). Hispanic concentration alone (n-ICEHispanic) was not associated with disparities, but combined with economic deprivation was (breast: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=0.70 vs IRRQ4=0.47; cervical: n-ICEHispanic+Income, IRRQ1=1.31 vs IRRQ4=0.93) (all P-values<.01). All racialized-economic segregation measures (n-ICENHB+Income/n-ICEHispanic+Income) showed increasing IRRs with higher segregation for both cancers (all P-trend<.04). No disparities were observed for colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Racialized-economic segregation in New York City was associated with higher advanced-stage diagnoses of breast and cervical cancer but not colorectal cancer. These findings may partially reflect both structural barriers that delay timely diagnosis and the impact of local equity-driven initiatives that broaden colorectal cancer screening access.