{"title":"C4植物对磷酸盐饥饿的反应与C3植物不同。","authors":"Raissa Krone,Silke Gerlich,Mette Mertens,Anna Koprivova,Philipp Westhoff,Stanislav Kopriva","doi":"10.1093/plphys/kiaf327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"C4 photosynthesis concentrates CO2 around RUBISCO, thereby decreasing photorespiration and leading to greater productivity. C4 photosynthesis evolved several times independently in different plant families including monocots and dicots. Beside changes in carbon fixation, C4 plants have also evolved several alterations in nitrogen and sulfur nutrition, leading to a better nitrogen use efficiency. Here, we utilized C3 and C4 species from two model systems, Flaveria and Panicum, to ask whether the evolution of C4 photosynthesis also affected phosphate homeostasis. The accumulation of phosphate within the plant shifted from the roots to the shoots with the evolution of C4, which can probably be explained by the higher demand of phosphate for completing the C4 cycle. A limitation of carbon assimilation by phosphate availability was shown solely for the C4 dicot plant, indicating a higher sensitivity to the starvation. Metabolic responses to phosphate limitation, including accumulation of amino acids, TCA cycle intermediates, as well as starch, were genus or species specific, rather than associated with the photosynthesis type. The expression of key phosphate starvation response genes was induced in all species by phosphate deficiency, while the high induction of microRNA399 coupled with a repression of PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2) was especially prominent in the C4 monocot. Thus, it seems that C4 photosynthesis increases the demand for phosphate in the leaves and C4 plants either respond more strongly to phosphate deficiency than C3 plants or experience inhibition of photosynthesis.","PeriodicalId":20101,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology","volume":"704 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C4 plants respond to phosphate starvation differently than C3 plants.\",\"authors\":\"Raissa Krone,Silke Gerlich,Mette Mertens,Anna Koprivova,Philipp Westhoff,Stanislav Kopriva\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/plphys/kiaf327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"C4 photosynthesis concentrates CO2 around RUBISCO, thereby decreasing photorespiration and leading to greater productivity. C4 photosynthesis evolved several times independently in different plant families including monocots and dicots. Beside changes in carbon fixation, C4 plants have also evolved several alterations in nitrogen and sulfur nutrition, leading to a better nitrogen use efficiency. Here, we utilized C3 and C4 species from two model systems, Flaveria and Panicum, to ask whether the evolution of C4 photosynthesis also affected phosphate homeostasis. The accumulation of phosphate within the plant shifted from the roots to the shoots with the evolution of C4, which can probably be explained by the higher demand of phosphate for completing the C4 cycle. A limitation of carbon assimilation by phosphate availability was shown solely for the C4 dicot plant, indicating a higher sensitivity to the starvation. Metabolic responses to phosphate limitation, including accumulation of amino acids, TCA cycle intermediates, as well as starch, were genus or species specific, rather than associated with the photosynthesis type. The expression of key phosphate starvation response genes was induced in all species by phosphate deficiency, while the high induction of microRNA399 coupled with a repression of PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2) was especially prominent in the C4 monocot. Thus, it seems that C4 photosynthesis increases the demand for phosphate in the leaves and C4 plants either respond more strongly to phosphate deficiency than C3 plants or experience inhibition of photosynthesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Physiology\",\"volume\":\"704 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf327\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
C4 plants respond to phosphate starvation differently than C3 plants.
C4 photosynthesis concentrates CO2 around RUBISCO, thereby decreasing photorespiration and leading to greater productivity. C4 photosynthesis evolved several times independently in different plant families including monocots and dicots. Beside changes in carbon fixation, C4 plants have also evolved several alterations in nitrogen and sulfur nutrition, leading to a better nitrogen use efficiency. Here, we utilized C3 and C4 species from two model systems, Flaveria and Panicum, to ask whether the evolution of C4 photosynthesis also affected phosphate homeostasis. The accumulation of phosphate within the plant shifted from the roots to the shoots with the evolution of C4, which can probably be explained by the higher demand of phosphate for completing the C4 cycle. A limitation of carbon assimilation by phosphate availability was shown solely for the C4 dicot plant, indicating a higher sensitivity to the starvation. Metabolic responses to phosphate limitation, including accumulation of amino acids, TCA cycle intermediates, as well as starch, were genus or species specific, rather than associated with the photosynthesis type. The expression of key phosphate starvation response genes was induced in all species by phosphate deficiency, while the high induction of microRNA399 coupled with a repression of PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2) was especially prominent in the C4 monocot. Thus, it seems that C4 photosynthesis increases the demand for phosphate in the leaves and C4 plants either respond more strongly to phosphate deficiency than C3 plants or experience inhibition of photosynthesis.
期刊介绍:
Plant Physiology® is a distinguished and highly respected journal with a rich history dating back to its establishment in 1926. It stands as a leading international publication in the field of plant biology, covering a comprehensive range of topics from the molecular and structural aspects of plant life to systems biology and ecophysiology. Recognized as the most highly cited journal in plant sciences, Plant Physiology® is a testament to its commitment to excellence and the dissemination of groundbreaking research.
As the official publication of the American Society of Plant Biologists, Plant Physiology® upholds rigorous peer-review standards, ensuring that the scientific community receives the highest quality research. The journal releases 12 issues annually, providing a steady stream of new findings and insights to its readership.