{"title":"超声心动图引导下经皮动脉导管未闭闭合:一项高海拔地区的前瞻性试验。","authors":"Hongliang Wei, Luxi Guan, Dong Luo, Zhengwei Li, Ping Ni, Zhuoga Danzeng, Zheng Ban, Xiangbin Pan, Luobu Gesang, Haibo Hu","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of interventional closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) via femoral venous puncture under echocardiography guidance at high altitude.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2022 to July 2023, 36 patients with PDA at high altitude were prospectively enrolled and underwent closure either under echocardiography guidance or fluoroscopy guidance. Baseline, procedural, and outcome characteristics were compared in intention-to-treat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The characteristics of patients and PDA were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of occlusion was 100% in both groups. Compared with the traditional fluoroscopy group, the echocardiography group showed a significant reduction in Air Kerma (112.13 ± 77.51 Gy vs. 247.27 ± 123.81 Gy, p = 0.001), Dose Area Product (24.3 [13.6-31.3] Gy·cm<sup>2</sup> vs. 41.5 [26.9-63.5] Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.015) and intraoperative contrast dose (0 vs. 1.74 ± 1.02 mL/kg, p < 0.001). In the fluoroscopy group, a significant rise in creatinine (60.47 ± 14.02 umol/L vs. 40.93 ± 14.94 umol/L, p < 0.001) and urea nitrogen levels (6.03 ± 1.12 mmol/L vs. 4.80 ± 0.81 mmol/L, p < 0.001) at 24 h postoperatively were detected compared to preoperative levels, whereas no such changes were detected in the echocardiography group. Except for one patient in the fluoroscopy group lost to 1-year follow-up, no adverse events were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At high altitude, echocardiography-guided percutaneous PDA closure offers comparable efficacy to traditional methods, with minimal X-ray exposure and no contrast-induced kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400090901).</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echocardiography-Guided Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure: A Prospective Trial at High Altitude.\",\"authors\":\"Hongliang Wei, Luxi Guan, Dong Luo, Zhengwei Li, Ping Ni, Zhuoga Danzeng, Zheng Ban, Xiangbin Pan, Luobu Gesang, Haibo Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of interventional closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) via femoral venous puncture under echocardiography guidance at high altitude.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2022 to July 2023, 36 patients with PDA at high altitude were prospectively enrolled and underwent closure either under echocardiography guidance or fluoroscopy guidance. Baseline, procedural, and outcome characteristics were compared in intention-to-treat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The characteristics of patients and PDA were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of occlusion was 100% in both groups. Compared with the traditional fluoroscopy group, the echocardiography group showed a significant reduction in Air Kerma (112.13 ± 77.51 Gy vs. 247.27 ± 123.81 Gy, p = 0.001), Dose Area Product (24.3 [13.6-31.3] Gy·cm<sup>2</sup> vs. 41.5 [26.9-63.5] Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.015) and intraoperative contrast dose (0 vs. 1.74 ± 1.02 mL/kg, p < 0.001). In the fluoroscopy group, a significant rise in creatinine (60.47 ± 14.02 umol/L vs. 40.93 ± 14.94 umol/L, p < 0.001) and urea nitrogen levels (6.03 ± 1.12 mmol/L vs. 4.80 ± 0.81 mmol/L, p < 0.001) at 24 h postoperatively were detected compared to preoperative levels, whereas no such changes were detected in the echocardiography group. Except for one patient in the fluoroscopy group lost to 1-year follow-up, no adverse events were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At high altitude, echocardiography-guided percutaneous PDA closure offers comparable efficacy to traditional methods, with minimal X-ray exposure and no contrast-induced kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400090901).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨高海拔超声心动图引导下经股静脉穿刺介入封堵动脉导管未闭的临床疗效和安全性。方法:从2022年12月至2023年7月,前瞻性纳入36例高海拔PDA患者,在超声心动图或透视引导下进行闭合。在意向治疗分析中比较基线、程序和结局特征。结果:两组患者的特征及PDA具有可比性。两组的封堵成功率均为100%。超声造影组Air Kerma(112.13±77.51 Gy比247.27±123.81 Gy, p = 0.001)、剂量面积积(24.3 [13.6-31.3]Gy·cm2比41.5 [26.9-63.5]Gy·cm2, p = 0.015)、术中造影剂(0比1.74±1.02 mL/kg, p)均显著降低。在高海拔地区,超声心动图引导下经皮PDA闭合术的疗效与传统方法相当,x线暴露最小,无造影剂引起的肾损伤。临床试验注册:该试验在http://www.chictr.org.cn注册(ChiCTR2400090901)。
Echocardiography-Guided Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure: A Prospective Trial at High Altitude.
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of interventional closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) via femoral venous puncture under echocardiography guidance at high altitude.
Methods: From December 2022 to July 2023, 36 patients with PDA at high altitude were prospectively enrolled and underwent closure either under echocardiography guidance or fluoroscopy guidance. Baseline, procedural, and outcome characteristics were compared in intention-to-treat analysis.
Results: The characteristics of patients and PDA were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of occlusion was 100% in both groups. Compared with the traditional fluoroscopy group, the echocardiography group showed a significant reduction in Air Kerma (112.13 ± 77.51 Gy vs. 247.27 ± 123.81 Gy, p = 0.001), Dose Area Product (24.3 [13.6-31.3] Gy·cm2 vs. 41.5 [26.9-63.5] Gy·cm2, p = 0.015) and intraoperative contrast dose (0 vs. 1.74 ± 1.02 mL/kg, p < 0.001). In the fluoroscopy group, a significant rise in creatinine (60.47 ± 14.02 umol/L vs. 40.93 ± 14.94 umol/L, p < 0.001) and urea nitrogen levels (6.03 ± 1.12 mmol/L vs. 4.80 ± 0.81 mmol/L, p < 0.001) at 24 h postoperatively were detected compared to preoperative levels, whereas no such changes were detected in the echocardiography group. Except for one patient in the fluoroscopy group lost to 1-year follow-up, no adverse events were reported in either group.
Conclusion: At high altitude, echocardiography-guided percutaneous PDA closure offers comparable efficacy to traditional methods, with minimal X-ray exposure and no contrast-induced kidney injury.
Clinical trial registration: The trial is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400090901).