Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy, Cansu Erseven, Büşra Erel, Sadık Görkem Çevik, İrfan Perente
{"title":"大流行对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体内注射治疗的影响,无论封锁期如何。","authors":"Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy, Cansu Erseven, Büşra Erel, Sadık Görkem Çevik, İrfan Perente","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2025.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment routine for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the data of intravitreal injections between March 2020 and June 1, 2021, which was the last day of official restrictions. We divided into two groups: a regular treatment group and a group that was interrupted for at least 3 months without excuse. The initial visual acuity at the beginning of the pandemic, the last visual acuity, the visual acuity after interruption, the central macular thickness, and the interruption time were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients' data were evaluated. There are forty-eight patients in the regular treatment group, 77 in the interruption group, and 31 in the discontinued group. The visual loss was significantly higher in the interruption group (respectively, -0.11 ± 0.19 vs. 0.03 ± 0.16, p<0.001). Central macular thickness changes were higher in the interruption group (respectively, 31.8 ± 5.7µm vs. 13.5 ± 4.6, p<0.001). The mean interruption time was 6.71 ± 2.45 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Half of the patients in our study interrupted their treatment during the pandemic, and this interruption had a negative impact on their visual acuity and central macular thickness. In addition to COVID-19's own high mortality and morbidity, it also had adverse effects on patients who required regular follow-up and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since interruptions in treatment negatively impact the prognosis of AMD, effective protocols that do not require frequent visits are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"69 2","pages":"164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment for patients with age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy, Cansu Erseven, Büşra Erel, Sadık Görkem Çevik, İrfan Perente\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2025.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment routine for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the data of intravitreal injections between March 2020 and June 1, 2021, which was the last day of official restrictions. We divided into two groups: a regular treatment group and a group that was interrupted for at least 3 months without excuse. The initial visual acuity at the beginning of the pandemic, the last visual acuity, the visual acuity after interruption, the central macular thickness, and the interruption time were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients' data were evaluated. There are forty-eight patients in the regular treatment group, 77 in the interruption group, and 31 in the discontinued group. The visual loss was significantly higher in the interruption group (respectively, -0.11 ± 0.19 vs. 0.03 ± 0.16, p<0.001). Central macular thickness changes were higher in the interruption group (respectively, 31.8 ± 5.7µm vs. 13.5 ± 4.6, p<0.001). The mean interruption time was 6.71 ± 2.45 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Half of the patients in our study interrupted their treatment during the pandemic, and this interruption had a negative impact on their visual acuity and central macular thickness. In addition to COVID-19's own high mortality and morbidity, it also had adverse effects on patients who required regular follow-up and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since interruptions in treatment negatively impact the prognosis of AMD, effective protocols that do not require frequent visits are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"164-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估大流行对新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者玻璃体内注射治疗常规的影响,无论锁定期如何。方法:我们评估了2020年3月至2021年6月1日(官方限制的最后一天)玻璃体内注射的数据。我们分为两组:一组是常规治疗组,另一组在没有任何借口的情况下被中断治疗至少3个月。记录大流行开始时的初始视力、最后的视力、中断后的视力、黄斑中央厚度、中断时间。结果:共评估了156例患者的资料。常规治疗组48例,中断治疗组77例,中断治疗组31例。中断组的视力损失明显更高(分别为-0.11±0.19 vs. 0.03±0.16)。讨论:在我们的研究中,有一半的患者在大流行期间中断了治疗,这种中断对他们的视力和中央黄斑厚度产生了负面影响。除了COVID-19本身的高死亡率和发病率外,它还对需要定期随访和治疗的患者产生不良影响。结论:由于治疗中断会对AMD的预后产生负面影响,因此不需要频繁就诊的有效方案是必要的。
The effect of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment for patients with age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal injection treatment routine for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, regardless of lockdown periods.
Methods: We evaluated the data of intravitreal injections between March 2020 and June 1, 2021, which was the last day of official restrictions. We divided into two groups: a regular treatment group and a group that was interrupted for at least 3 months without excuse. The initial visual acuity at the beginning of the pandemic, the last visual acuity, the visual acuity after interruption, the central macular thickness, and the interruption time were recorded.
Results: A total of 156 patients' data were evaluated. There are forty-eight patients in the regular treatment group, 77 in the interruption group, and 31 in the discontinued group. The visual loss was significantly higher in the interruption group (respectively, -0.11 ± 0.19 vs. 0.03 ± 0.16, p<0.001). Central macular thickness changes were higher in the interruption group (respectively, 31.8 ± 5.7µm vs. 13.5 ± 4.6, p<0.001). The mean interruption time was 6.71 ± 2.45 months.
Discussion: Half of the patients in our study interrupted their treatment during the pandemic, and this interruption had a negative impact on their visual acuity and central macular thickness. In addition to COVID-19's own high mortality and morbidity, it also had adverse effects on patients who required regular follow-up and treatment.
Conclusion: Since interruptions in treatment negatively impact the prognosis of AMD, effective protocols that do not require frequent visits are necessary.