柔性支气管镜下气管插管与气管内插管治疗过程中声门上气道的疗效和安全性比较。

IF 2.4
Chao-Lan Huang, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yi-Ying Lee, Chun-Ching Lu, Ting-Yun Chiang, Wei-Nung Teng, Wen-Kuei Chang, Chien-Kun Ting
{"title":"柔性支气管镜下气管插管与气管内插管治疗过程中声门上气道的疗效和安全性比较。","authors":"Chao-Lan Huang, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yi-Ying Lee, Chun-Ching Lu, Ting-Yun Chiang, Wei-Nung Teng, Wen-Kuei Chang, Chien-Kun Ting","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible bronchoscopy is frequently employed for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, but airway management during these procedures is challenging due to the need to share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation, while providing a secure airway, often requires repeated insertion and removal of the tube to allow for bronchoscopic access. Additionally, the narrower internal diameter of the endotracheal tube can limit the maneuverability of the bronchoscope, making procedures more technically demanding. In contrast, the supraglottic airway (SGA)-originally developed by an anesthesiologist known as laryngeal mask-is a less invasive device that sits above the larynx and forms a seal around the glottic opening to allow for effective ventilation. SGAs typically have a wider lumen and do not require repeated placement during procedures, offering a more convenient and potentially safer conduit for flexible bronchoscopy. Despite these advantages, direct comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of SGA vs endotracheal intubation in this context remains lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed charts and perioperative data regarding patients who underwent tracheal therapeutic procedures using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2019 and 2024. The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, ventilation, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 procedures were analyzed. There was a significantly higher proportion of female patients in the SGA group (67.7%) compared with the endotracheal intubation group (22.9%, p < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed a significant reduction in the requirement for repeated airway manipulations with the SGA compared with endotracheal intubation ( p < 0.001). The median lowest oxygen saturation was higher with SGA (97% vs 94%, p = 0.001), while end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) levels were comparable (45 vs 44 mmHg, p = 0.94). In addition, patients in the SGA group were weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier and had significantly shorter hospital stays (5.5 vs 30 days, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with endotracheal intubation, the SGA is an effective alternative for airway management during therapeutic tracheal procedures using flexible bronchoscopy. It reduces the need for repeated airway manipulation, provides better oxygenation with comparable ventilation, maintains continuous airway control, and serves as a reliable conduit for bronchoscope insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"681-685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and the safety of supraglottic airway in therapeutic procedure of trachea via flexible bronchoscopy compared with endotracheal intubation.\",\"authors\":\"Chao-Lan Huang, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yi-Ying Lee, Chun-Ching Lu, Ting-Yun Chiang, Wei-Nung Teng, Wen-Kuei Chang, Chien-Kun Ting\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible bronchoscopy is frequently employed for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, but airway management during these procedures is challenging due to the need to share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation, while providing a secure airway, often requires repeated insertion and removal of the tube to allow for bronchoscopic access. Additionally, the narrower internal diameter of the endotracheal tube can limit the maneuverability of the bronchoscope, making procedures more technically demanding. In contrast, the supraglottic airway (SGA)-originally developed by an anesthesiologist known as laryngeal mask-is a less invasive device that sits above the larynx and forms a seal around the glottic opening to allow for effective ventilation. SGAs typically have a wider lumen and do not require repeated placement during procedures, offering a more convenient and potentially safer conduit for flexible bronchoscopy. Despite these advantages, direct comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of SGA vs endotracheal intubation in this context remains lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed charts and perioperative data regarding patients who underwent tracheal therapeutic procedures using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2019 and 2024. The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, ventilation, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 procedures were analyzed. There was a significantly higher proportion of female patients in the SGA group (67.7%) compared with the endotracheal intubation group (22.9%, p < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed a significant reduction in the requirement for repeated airway manipulations with the SGA compared with endotracheal intubation ( p < 0.001). The median lowest oxygen saturation was higher with SGA (97% vs 94%, p = 0.001), while end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) levels were comparable (45 vs 44 mmHg, p = 0.94). In addition, patients in the SGA group were weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier and had significantly shorter hospital stays (5.5 vs 30 days, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with endotracheal intubation, the SGA is an effective alternative for airway management during therapeutic tracheal procedures using flexible bronchoscopy. It reduces the need for repeated airway manipulation, provides better oxygenation with comparable ventilation, maintains continuous airway control, and serves as a reliable conduit for bronchoscope insertion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"681-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:柔性支气管镜检查经常用于气管病变的治疗干预,但由于通气和器械需要共用气道,因此在这些过程中气道管理具有挑战性。气管插管,虽然提供了一个安全的气道,但往往需要反复插入和取出管,以便支气管镜进入。此外,气管内管的内径较窄会限制支气管镜的可操作性,使手术对技术的要求更高。相比之下,声门上气道(SGA)——最初由一位麻醉师发明,被称为喉罩——是一种侵入性较小的装置,位于喉头上方,在声门开口周围形成密封,以实现有效的通气。SGAs通常具有更宽的管腔,并且在手术过程中不需要重复放置,为柔性支气管镜检查提供了更方便和潜在更安全的导管。尽管有这些优势,在这种情况下,SGA与气管插管的安全性和有效性的直接比较证据仍然缺乏。方法:回顾2019年至2024年在台北退伍军人总医院全麻下采用柔性支气管镜进行气管治疗的患者的图表和围手术期数据。主要观察指标是需要重复气道操作的总次数。次要结局包括氧合、通气、住院时间和手术相关并发症。结果:共分析了65例手术。SGA组女性患者比例(67.7%)明显高于气管插管组(22.9%,p < 0.001)。Mann-Whitney U检验显示,与气管插管相比,SGA对重复气道操作的需求显著减少(p < 0.001)。SGA患者最低血氧饱和度中位数较高(97%对94%,p = 0.001),而EtCO₂水平相当(45 mmHg对44 mmHg, p = 0.94)。此外,SGA组患者较早脱离机械通气,住院时间明显缩短(5.5天对30天,p < 0.001)。结论:与气管插管相比,柔性支气管镜治疗气管手术时,SGA是一种有效的气道管理方法。它减少了重复气道操作的需要,提供了更好的氧合和类似的通气,维持持续的气道控制,并作为支气管镜插入的可靠管道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy and the safety of supraglottic airway in therapeutic procedure of trachea via flexible bronchoscopy compared with endotracheal intubation.

Background: Flexible bronchoscopy is frequently employed for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, but airway management during these procedures is challenging due to the need to share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation, while providing a secure airway, often requires repeated insertion and removal of the tube to allow for bronchoscopic access. Additionally, the narrower internal diameter of the endotracheal tube can limit the maneuverability of the bronchoscope, making procedures more technically demanding. In contrast, the supraglottic airway (SGA)-originally developed by an anesthesiologist known as laryngeal mask-is a less invasive device that sits above the larynx and forms a seal around the glottic opening to allow for effective ventilation. SGAs typically have a wider lumen and do not require repeated placement during procedures, offering a more convenient and potentially safer conduit for flexible bronchoscopy. Despite these advantages, direct comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of SGA vs endotracheal intubation in this context remains lacking.

Methods: We reviewed charts and perioperative data regarding patients who underwent tracheal therapeutic procedures using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2019 and 2024. The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, ventilation, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related complications.

Results: A total of 65 procedures were analyzed. There was a significantly higher proportion of female patients in the SGA group (67.7%) compared with the endotracheal intubation group (22.9%, p < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed a significant reduction in the requirement for repeated airway manipulations with the SGA compared with endotracheal intubation ( p < 0.001). The median lowest oxygen saturation was higher with SGA (97% vs 94%, p = 0.001), while end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) levels were comparable (45 vs 44 mmHg, p = 0.94). In addition, patients in the SGA group were weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier and had significantly shorter hospital stays (5.5 vs 30 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with endotracheal intubation, the SGA is an effective alternative for airway management during therapeutic tracheal procedures using flexible bronchoscopy. It reduces the need for repeated airway manipulation, provides better oxygenation with comparable ventilation, maintains continuous airway control, and serves as a reliable conduit for bronchoscope insertion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信