贝克特的《莫洛伊》中政治的基本运作。

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.19926.1
Paul Stewart
{"title":"贝克特的《莫洛伊》中政治的基本运作。","authors":"Paul Stewart","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.19926.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The political novel might be defined in terms of \"genre,\" or a novel's overt intervention within a pre-established political field. However, this chapter contends that the process of personal individuation and incorporation within the State (or <i>polis</i>) is the fundamental operation of the political within the novel as a form. In order to sketch out the parallel, and paradoxical, operation of becoming an individual subject at the same time as, and in relation to, incorporation into a wider social state, this chapter examines how Samuel Beckett's <i>Molloy</i> (1951) plots the resistance of its eponymous protagonist against both benign and coercive attempts to (a) define him as an individual, and (b) to assimilate him into the social body on that basis. Drawing on the works of Aristotle, Agamben, Bersani and Rancière, the chapter focuses on Molloy's methods of avoidance of becoming a state-recognised and state-sanctioned subject and reads this avoidance as a form of resistance to the established <i>polity</i>. It is argued that Beckett's non-relational art, of which <i>Molloy</i> is an early example, raises important theoretical issues concerning the interconnectivity of the political and the novel at a fundamental level. If the novel is dependent on just the sort of process that Molloy resists - that is on claims of individuality and relation -, can the novel as a form actively resist the political and resist assimilation and incorporation into a pre-established <i>polis</i>?</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamental operations of the political in Beckett's <i>Molloy</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.19926.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The political novel might be defined in terms of \\\"genre,\\\" or a novel's overt intervention within a pre-established political field. However, this chapter contends that the process of personal individuation and incorporation within the State (or <i>polis</i>) is the fundamental operation of the political within the novel as a form. In order to sketch out the parallel, and paradoxical, operation of becoming an individual subject at the same time as, and in relation to, incorporation into a wider social state, this chapter examines how Samuel Beckett's <i>Molloy</i> (1951) plots the resistance of its eponymous protagonist against both benign and coercive attempts to (a) define him as an individual, and (b) to assimilate him into the social body on that basis. Drawing on the works of Aristotle, Agamben, Bersani and Rancière, the chapter focuses on Molloy's methods of avoidance of becoming a state-recognised and state-sanctioned subject and reads this avoidance as a form of resistance to the established <i>polity</i>. It is argued that Beckett's non-relational art, of which <i>Molloy</i> is an early example, raises important theoretical issues concerning the interconnectivity of the political and the novel at a fundamental level. If the novel is dependent on just the sort of process that Molloy resists - that is on claims of individuality and relation -, can the novel as a form actively resist the political and resist assimilation and incorporation into a pre-established <i>polis</i>?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19926.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19926.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治小说可以用“体裁”来定义,或者用小说对预先建立的政治领域的公开干预来定义。然而,本章认为,个人个体化和国家(或城邦)内部的整合过程是小说中作为一种形式的政治的基本运作。为了勾勒出在融入更广泛的社会状态的同时成为个体主体的平行和矛盾的运作,本章研究了塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的《莫洛伊》(Molloy, 1951)如何描绘同名主人公对善意和强制性企图(a)将他定义为个体,(b)在此基础上将他同化为社会主体的反抗。本章借鉴了亚里士多德、阿甘本、贝尔萨尼和朗西姆特雷的著作,重点讨论了莫洛伊避免成为国家承认和认可的主体的方法,并将这种避免解读为对既定政体的一种抵抗形式。以莫洛伊为代表的贝克特的非关系艺术从根本上提出了政治与小说相互联系的重要理论问题。如果小说仅仅依赖于莫洛伊所抵制的那种过程,即依赖于个性和关系的主张,那么小说作为一种形式,能否积极地抵制政治,抵制同化,抵制融入一个预先建立的城邦?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fundamental operations of the political in Beckett's Molloy.

The political novel might be defined in terms of "genre," or a novel's overt intervention within a pre-established political field. However, this chapter contends that the process of personal individuation and incorporation within the State (or polis) is the fundamental operation of the political within the novel as a form. In order to sketch out the parallel, and paradoxical, operation of becoming an individual subject at the same time as, and in relation to, incorporation into a wider social state, this chapter examines how Samuel Beckett's Molloy (1951) plots the resistance of its eponymous protagonist against both benign and coercive attempts to (a) define him as an individual, and (b) to assimilate him into the social body on that basis. Drawing on the works of Aristotle, Agamben, Bersani and Rancière, the chapter focuses on Molloy's methods of avoidance of becoming a state-recognised and state-sanctioned subject and reads this avoidance as a form of resistance to the established polity. It is argued that Beckett's non-relational art, of which Molloy is an early example, raises important theoretical issues concerning the interconnectivity of the political and the novel at a fundamental level. If the novel is dependent on just the sort of process that Molloy resists - that is on claims of individuality and relation -, can the novel as a form actively resist the political and resist assimilation and incorporation into a pre-established polis?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信