增加金黄色葡萄球菌患者随访血培养干预的影响。

Jared Olson, Vincent Anella, Brandon J Webb, Andrew T Pavia, Emily A Thorell, Adam L Hersh, Dustin Waters
{"title":"增加金黄色葡萄球菌患者随访血培养干预的影响。","authors":"Jared Olson, Vincent Anella, Brandon J Webb, Andrew T Pavia, Emily A Thorell, Adam L Hersh, Dustin Waters","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria (SABU) may represent bacteremia in a subset of patients. We describe the impact of a microbiology alert recommending follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) for patients with SABU in a large integrated health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental implementation study in adult ambulatory patients with documented SABU. We excluded patients with confirmed SAB up to 14 days prior to index SABU culture and with blood cultures obtained on the day of SABU. The primary outcome was rate of FUBC (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU) among all cases of SABU. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients with early SAB (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU). We used interrupted time series analysis to compare rates of FUBC pre vs postintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2 540 patients were identified; 1 213 (48%) were male. By the end of the postintervention period, the rate of FUBC (20.6%) had increased by 6.3 percentage points (<i>P</i> = .005) compared to the counterfactual (14.2%) had no intervention taken place (44.5% relative increase). Early SAB detection due to FUBC increased from .6% preintervention to 2.0% postintervention (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The microbiology alert initiative increased FUBC in patients with SABU by 44%, but the overall rate of FUBC remained low. The intervention increased early SAB detection. Risk-targeted strategies are needed to optimize FUBC collection in patients with SABU.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of an intervention to increase follow-up blood cultures for patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria.\",\"authors\":\"Jared Olson, Vincent Anella, Brandon J Webb, Andrew T Pavia, Emily A Thorell, Adam L Hersh, Dustin Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.10067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria (SABU) may represent bacteremia in a subset of patients. We describe the impact of a microbiology alert recommending follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) for patients with SABU in a large integrated health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental implementation study in adult ambulatory patients with documented SABU. We excluded patients with confirmed SAB up to 14 days prior to index SABU culture and with blood cultures obtained on the day of SABU. The primary outcome was rate of FUBC (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU) among all cases of SABU. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients with early SAB (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU). We used interrupted time series analysis to compare rates of FUBC pre vs postintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2 540 patients were identified; 1 213 (48%) were male. By the end of the postintervention period, the rate of FUBC (20.6%) had increased by 6.3 percentage points (<i>P</i> = .005) compared to the counterfactual (14.2%) had no intervention taken place (44.5% relative increase). Early SAB detection due to FUBC increased from .6% preintervention to 2.0% postintervention (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The microbiology alert initiative increased FUBC in patients with SABU by 44%, but the overall rate of FUBC remained low. The intervention increased early SAB detection. Risk-targeted strategies are needed to optimize FUBC collection in patients with SABU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:金黄色葡萄球菌菌尿(SABU)可能代表了一部分患者的菌血症。我们描述了在大型综合卫生系统中推荐SABU患者随访血液培养(FUBC)的微生物警报的影响。方法:我们对有记录的成年SABU门诊患者进行了准实验实施研究。我们排除了在SABU培养前14天确诊的SAB患者和在SABU当天获得血培养的患者。主要结果是所有SABU病例的FUBC率(收集于SABU发生后1 - 5天)。次要结局包括早期SAB患者的百分比(收集于SABU发生1至5天之间)。我们使用中断时间序列分析来比较干预前后FUBC的发生率。结果:共发现2 540例患者;男性1213例(48%)。干预期结束时,与未进行干预的反事实发生率(14.2%)(相对增加44.5%)相比,FUBC发生率(20.6%)增加了6.3个百分点(P = 0.005)。FUBC导致的早期SAB检出率从干预前的0.6%上升到干预后的2.0% (P = 0.004)。结论:微生物预警措施使SABU患者的FUBC增加了44%,但总体的FUBC率仍然很低。干预增加了早期SAB的发现。需要针对风险的策略来优化SABU患者的FUBC收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of an intervention to increase follow-up blood cultures for patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria.

The impact of an intervention to increase follow-up blood cultures for patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria.

The impact of an intervention to increase follow-up blood cultures for patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteriuria.

The impact of an intervention to increase follow-up blood cultures for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria.

Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria (SABU) may represent bacteremia in a subset of patients. We describe the impact of a microbiology alert recommending follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) for patients with SABU in a large integrated health system.

Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental implementation study in adult ambulatory patients with documented SABU. We excluded patients with confirmed SAB up to 14 days prior to index SABU culture and with blood cultures obtained on the day of SABU. The primary outcome was rate of FUBC (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU) among all cases of SABU. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients with early SAB (collected between 1 and 5 days of SABU). We used interrupted time series analysis to compare rates of FUBC pre vs postintervention.

Results: A total of 2 540 patients were identified; 1 213 (48%) were male. By the end of the postintervention period, the rate of FUBC (20.6%) had increased by 6.3 percentage points (P = .005) compared to the counterfactual (14.2%) had no intervention taken place (44.5% relative increase). Early SAB detection due to FUBC increased from .6% preintervention to 2.0% postintervention (P = .004).

Conclusion: The microbiology alert initiative increased FUBC in patients with SABU by 44%, but the overall rate of FUBC remained low. The intervention increased early SAB detection. Risk-targeted strategies are needed to optimize FUBC collection in patients with SABU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信