{"title":"[2022年宣城、苏州地区中学生父母控制与亲社会行为的关系:同伴关系的中介作用]。","authors":"Zhenghao Qi, Zhiyuan Qi, Wengeng Han, Hui Han","doi":"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relationship between the level of parental control and peer relationships and prosocial behavior of junior high school students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June-July 2022, a total of 2564 junior high school students were selected from one junior high school in each of the urban, rural and combined urban and rural areas of Xuancheng City and Suzhou City, Anhui Province, using random whole cluster sampling to collect data using the Level of Parental Control Scale, the Tendency to Prosocial Behavior Scale for Junior High School Students, and the Children's Junior High School Student Peer Relationships Scale, and the SPSS 25.0 software was used to data were analyzed, descriptive analysis, t-test, ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed on the data, and the mediating effects of parental control and prosocial behavior were verified using the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 1281 boys and 1283 girls, aged between 11 and 17 years with a mean age of(13.39±0.80) years. Male students had higher parental control score than female students(185.31±27.49 vs 178.21±25.13, P<0.01) and male students had lower peer relationship score than female students(47.13±10.84 vs 48.41±11.26, P<0.01). Rural students had lower parental control scores than urban and urban-rural students(172.47±25.40 vs 183.03±24.63 vs 190.37±26.61, P<0.01). Rural students had higher peer relationship scores than urban and urban-rural students(49.57±10.57 vs 48.33±10.84 vs 45.25±11.39, P<0.01). Rural students had lower pro-social behavior scores than urban and combined urban and rural students(86.27±16.98 vs 91.64±17.26 vs 95.14±19.27, P<0.01). The differences in parental control and peer relationship scores among middle school students of different genders were statistically significant(P<0.01). The differences in parental control, pro-social behavior and peer relationship scores among students from different cities, urban-rural areas and rural areas were statistically significant(P<0.01). Parental control was positively correlated with both pro-social behavior scores of junior high school students(r=0.315). Peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' pro-social behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=8.50%). Among students in rural and urban-rural combined areas, peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' prosocial behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=17.81%), and the mediating effect of peer relationships was not statistically significant among students in urban areas(Bootstrap 95% CI-0.0157-0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parental control positively affects peer relationships and prosocial behavior among junior high school students, and good peer relationships significantly and positively affect the development of pro-social behavior among junior high school students; the mediating effect of peer relationships between parental control and prosocial behavior varies with urban and rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":57744,"journal":{"name":"卫生研究","volume":"54 4","pages":"646-653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Associations between parental control and prosocial behavior among middle school students in Xuancheng and Suzhou in 2022: Mediating role of peer relationships].\",\"authors\":\"Zhenghao Qi, Zhiyuan Qi, Wengeng Han, Hui Han\",\"doi\":\"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relationship between the level of parental control and peer relationships and prosocial behavior of junior high school students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June-July 2022, a total of 2564 junior high school students were selected from one junior high school in each of the urban, rural and combined urban and rural areas of Xuancheng City and Suzhou City, Anhui Province, using random whole cluster sampling to collect data using the Level of Parental Control Scale, the Tendency to Prosocial Behavior Scale for Junior High School Students, and the Children's Junior High School Student Peer Relationships Scale, and the SPSS 25.0 software was used to data were analyzed, descriptive analysis, t-test, ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed on the data, and the mediating effects of parental control and prosocial behavior were verified using the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 1281 boys and 1283 girls, aged between 11 and 17 years with a mean age of(13.39±0.80) years. Male students had higher parental control score than female students(185.31±27.49 vs 178.21±25.13, P<0.01) and male students had lower peer relationship score than female students(47.13±10.84 vs 48.41±11.26, P<0.01). Rural students had lower parental control scores than urban and urban-rural students(172.47±25.40 vs 183.03±24.63 vs 190.37±26.61, P<0.01). Rural students had higher peer relationship scores than urban and urban-rural students(49.57±10.57 vs 48.33±10.84 vs 45.25±11.39, P<0.01). Rural students had lower pro-social behavior scores than urban and combined urban and rural students(86.27±16.98 vs 91.64±17.26 vs 95.14±19.27, P<0.01). The differences in parental control and peer relationship scores among middle school students of different genders were statistically significant(P<0.01). The differences in parental control, pro-social behavior and peer relationship scores among students from different cities, urban-rural areas and rural areas were statistically significant(P<0.01). Parental control was positively correlated with both pro-social behavior scores of junior high school students(r=0.315). Peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' pro-social behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=8.50%). Among students in rural and urban-rural combined areas, peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' prosocial behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=17.81%), and the mediating effect of peer relationships was not statistically significant among students in urban areas(Bootstrap 95% CI-0.0157-0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parental control positively affects peer relationships and prosocial behavior among junior high school students, and good peer relationships significantly and positively affect the development of pro-social behavior among junior high school students; the mediating effect of peer relationships between parental control and prosocial behavior varies with urban and rural areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":57744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"卫生研究\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"646-653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"卫生研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"卫生研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨初中生父母控制水平、同伴关系与亲社会行为的关系。方法:于2022年6 - 7月,在安徽省宣城市和苏州市的城市、农村和城乡结合部各选取一所初中,共2564名初中生,采用随机整群抽样的方法,采用《父母控制水平量表》、《初中生亲社会行为倾向量表》和《儿童初中生同伴关系量表》进行数据采集。采用SPSS 25.0软件对数据进行分析,对数据进行描述性分析、t检验、方差分析和相关分析,并采用偏差校正非参数百分位Bootstrap方法验证父母控制对亲社会行为的中介作用。结果:研究人群包括1281名男孩和1283名女孩,年龄在11 ~ 17岁之间,平均年龄(13.39±0.80)岁。男生家长控制得分高于女生(185.31±27.49比178.21±25.13,p < 0.01),男生同伴关系得分低于女生(47.13±10.84比48.41±11.26,p < 0.01)。农村学生家长控制得分低于城市和城乡学生(172.47±25.40 vs 183.03±24.63 vs 190.37±26.61,p < 0.01)。农村学生同伴关系得分高于城市和城乡学生(49.57±10.57 vs 48.33±10.84 vs 45.25±11.39,p < 0.01)。农村学生亲社会行为得分低于城市学生和城乡结合部学生(86.27±16.98比91.64±17.26比95.14±19.27,p < 0.01)。不同性别中学生的父母控制和同伴关系得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。不同城市、城乡和农村地区学生在父母控制、亲社会行为和同伴关系得分上的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。父母控制与初中生亲社会行为得分均呈正相关(r=0.315)。同伴关系在父母控制与初中生成长之间起掩蔽效应;亲社会行为(a×b和c‘异方差,|a×b|/c’=8.50%)。在农村和城乡结合部学生中,同伴关系在父母控制与初中生行为之间起掩蔽作用;亲社会行为(a×b和c′异方差,|/c′=17.81%),同伴关系在城市地区学生中的中介作用无统计学意义(Bootstrap 95% CI-0.0157-0.004)。结论:父母控制正向影响初中生同伴关系和亲社会行为,良好的同伴关系显著正向影响初中生亲社会行为的发展;同伴关系在父母控制与亲社会行为之间的中介作用在城市和农村地区存在差异。
[Associations between parental control and prosocial behavior among middle school students in Xuancheng and Suzhou in 2022: Mediating role of peer relationships].
Objective: To explore the relationship between the level of parental control and peer relationships and prosocial behavior of junior high school students.
Methods: In June-July 2022, a total of 2564 junior high school students were selected from one junior high school in each of the urban, rural and combined urban and rural areas of Xuancheng City and Suzhou City, Anhui Province, using random whole cluster sampling to collect data using the Level of Parental Control Scale, the Tendency to Prosocial Behavior Scale for Junior High School Students, and the Children's Junior High School Student Peer Relationships Scale, and the SPSS 25.0 software was used to data were analyzed, descriptive analysis, t-test, ANOVA and correlation analysis were performed on the data, and the mediating effects of parental control and prosocial behavior were verified using the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method.
Results: The study population consisted of 1281 boys and 1283 girls, aged between 11 and 17 years with a mean age of(13.39±0.80) years. Male students had higher parental control score than female students(185.31±27.49 vs 178.21±25.13, P<0.01) and male students had lower peer relationship score than female students(47.13±10.84 vs 48.41±11.26, P<0.01). Rural students had lower parental control scores than urban and urban-rural students(172.47±25.40 vs 183.03±24.63 vs 190.37±26.61, P<0.01). Rural students had higher peer relationship scores than urban and urban-rural students(49.57±10.57 vs 48.33±10.84 vs 45.25±11.39, P<0.01). Rural students had lower pro-social behavior scores than urban and combined urban and rural students(86.27±16.98 vs 91.64±17.26 vs 95.14±19.27, P<0.01). The differences in parental control and peer relationship scores among middle school students of different genders were statistically significant(P<0.01). The differences in parental control, pro-social behavior and peer relationship scores among students from different cities, urban-rural areas and rural areas were statistically significant(P<0.01). Parental control was positively correlated with both pro-social behavior scores of junior high school students(r=0.315). Peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' pro-social behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=8.50%). Among students in rural and urban-rural combined areas, peer relationship played a masking effect between parental control and junior high school students' prosocial behavior(a×b and c' heteroscedastic, |a×b|/c'=17.81%), and the mediating effect of peer relationships was not statistically significant among students in urban areas(Bootstrap 95% CI-0.0157-0.004).
Conclusion: Parental control positively affects peer relationships and prosocial behavior among junior high school students, and good peer relationships significantly and positively affect the development of pro-social behavior among junior high school students; the mediating effect of peer relationships between parental control and prosocial behavior varies with urban and rural areas.