W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski
{"title":"矢状面造影评估髋臼杯位置装置的体外评价。","authors":"W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski","doi":"10.1055/a-2651-6297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test with a <i>p</i>-value set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (<i>p</i> = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (<i>R</i> <sub>c</sub> value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Evaluation of a Device to Assess Acetabular Cup Position by Sagittal Plane Radiography.\",\"authors\":\"W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2651-6297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test with a <i>p</i>-value set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (<i>p</i> = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (<i>R</i> <sub>c</sub> value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2651-6297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2651-6297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Vitro Evaluation of a Device to Assess Acetabular Cup Position by Sagittal Plane Radiography.
The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired t-test with a p-value set at p < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (p = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (Rc value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.