矢状面造影评估髋臼杯位置装置的体外评价。

IF 1.1 2区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski
{"title":"矢状面造影评估髋臼杯位置装置的体外评价。","authors":"W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski","doi":"10.1055/a-2651-6297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test with a <i>p</i>-value set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (<i>p</i> = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (<i>R</i> <sub>c</sub> value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Evaluation of a Device to Assess Acetabular Cup Position by Sagittal Plane Radiography.\",\"authors\":\"W Michael Karlin, Ross Lirtzman, Michael P Kowaleski\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2651-6297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test with a <i>p</i>-value set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (<i>p</i> = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (<i>R</i> <sub>c</sub> value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2651-6297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2651-6297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用髋臼杯位置评估装置(CPAD)获得的外侧开口(ALO)和开放面版本的计算角度与已知的髋臼假体的外侧开口(ALO)和开放面版本。原假设是,与已知值相比,使用CPAD的ALO和开放式版本之间没有显着差异。模拟矢状面骨盆的x线摄影图像是用BFX™髋臼组件获得的,该组件包含一个CPAD,安装在带有双平面倾角计的有机玻璃夹具上。图像在0度的开放面版本获得,在30度,40度,45度,50度和60度的ALO,重复三次,随机化。使用CPAD棒的测量值来计算开放面版本,使用配对t检验(p = 0.608)比较ALO测量值,结果显示ALO与Lin’s一致性相关系数(R c值)接近完美相关为0.994。计算出的开放面版本与已知版本有显著差异。结果表明,CPAD是一种准确的方法来确定模拟矢状面骨盆x线片上的ALO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Evaluation of a Device to Assess Acetabular Cup Position by Sagittal Plane Radiography.

The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated angle of lateral opening (ALO) and open-face version obtained using an acetabular cup position assessment device (CPAD) to the known ALO and open-face version of an acetabular component. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the ALO and open-face versions using the CPAD compared with the known values.Radiographic images simulating a sagittal plane pelvis were obtained with a BFX™ acetabular component containing a CPAD mounted on a plexiglass jig with a dual-plane inclinometer. Images were obtained at an open-face version of 0 degrees with ALO at 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 degrees, repeated in triplicate, and were randomized. Measurements of the CPAD bars were used to calculate the open-face version, and ALO measurements were compared using a paired t-test with a p-value set at p < 0.05. Agreement was assessed with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.The calculated ALO was not significantly different from the known ALO (p = 0.608) and showed near-perfect correlation of the ALO with a Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (R c value) of 0.994. The calculated open-face version was significantly different from the known version.The results demonstrate that the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO in a simulated sagittal plane pelvis radiographic view.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信