马来西亚主流新闻媒体对LGBT社群的报导:进步还是倒退?

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jiin-Yih Yeo, Gordon Campbell, Hugh John Leong Yik Kuan, Mung Ling Voon
{"title":"马来西亚主流新闻媒体对LGBT社群的报导:进步还是倒退?","authors":"Jiin-Yih Yeo, Gordon Campbell, Hugh John Leong Yik Kuan, Mung Ling Voon","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2534553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the discursive strategies employed in Malaysian online newspapers to represent the LGBT community. Using the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), this qualitative research focuses on news articles published in 2023, drawing from three mainstream Malaysian newspapers: <i>The Star Online, Harian Metro</i> and <i>China Press ()</i>. The findings show that nomination strategies categorize LGBT individuals through broad labels such as \"LGBT\" or specific terms like \"gay\" or \"transgender.\" Predication strategies reinforce negative associations, often depicting LGBT individuals as morally or culturally deviant. Argumentation strategies reveal that conservative perspectives dominate, particularly those based on religious and cultural arguments, while economic, legal and human rights perspectives are present but are often secondary to traditional views. Perspectivization strategies highlight the use of authoritative voices, such as religious leaders and politicians, to legitimize dominant narratives. Intensification strategies, such as active verbs and augmentatives, highlight perceived risks linked to LGBT issues, while mitigation strategies, including modal verbs, allow newspapers to address these topics without taking a firm stance. Malaysian newspapers construct a layered portrayal of the LGBT community, framing them as distinct and as challenging norms while aligning narratives with cultural sensitivities, thereby reinforcing an \"us\" versus \"them\" dynamic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstream News Media Representation of the LGBT Community in Malaysia: Progression or Regression?\",\"authors\":\"Jiin-Yih Yeo, Gordon Campbell, Hugh John Leong Yik Kuan, Mung Ling Voon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2534553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the discursive strategies employed in Malaysian online newspapers to represent the LGBT community. Using the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), this qualitative research focuses on news articles published in 2023, drawing from three mainstream Malaysian newspapers: <i>The Star Online, Harian Metro</i> and <i>China Press ()</i>. The findings show that nomination strategies categorize LGBT individuals through broad labels such as \\\"LGBT\\\" or specific terms like \\\"gay\\\" or \\\"transgender.\\\" Predication strategies reinforce negative associations, often depicting LGBT individuals as morally or culturally deviant. Argumentation strategies reveal that conservative perspectives dominate, particularly those based on religious and cultural arguments, while economic, legal and human rights perspectives are present but are often secondary to traditional views. Perspectivization strategies highlight the use of authoritative voices, such as religious leaders and politicians, to legitimize dominant narratives. Intensification strategies, such as active verbs and augmentatives, highlight perceived risks linked to LGBT issues, while mitigation strategies, including modal verbs, allow newspapers to address these topics without taking a firm stance. Malaysian newspapers construct a layered portrayal of the LGBT community, framing them as distinct and as challenging norms while aligning narratives with cultural sensitivities, thereby reinforcing an \\\"us\\\" versus \\\"them\\\" dynamic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2534553\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2534553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检视马来西亚线上报纸为代表LGBT社群所采用的话语策略。使用话语历史方法(DHA),本定性研究侧重于2023年发表的新闻文章,来自马来西亚三家主流报纸:星报在线,哈里安地铁和中国出版社()。研究结果表明,提名策略通过“LGBT”等宽泛的标签或“同性恋”或“变性人”等特定术语对LGBT个人进行分类。预测策略强化了负面联想,经常将LGBT个体描述为道德或文化上的偏差。辩论策略表明,保守观点占主导地位,特别是基于宗教和文化论点的观点,而经济、法律和人权观点也存在,但往往次于传统观点。透视化策略强调使用权威的声音,如宗教领袖和政治家,使主导叙事合法化。强化策略,如主动动词和助词,突出了与LGBT问题相关的感知风险,而缓解策略,包括情态动词,允许报纸在不采取坚定立场的情况下解决这些话题。马来西亚的报纸对LGBT群体进行了多层次的描述,将他们塑造成独特的、具有挑战性的规范,同时将叙事与文化敏感性结合起来,从而强化了“我们”与“他们”之间的动态关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mainstream News Media Representation of the LGBT Community in Malaysia: Progression or Regression?

This study examines the discursive strategies employed in Malaysian online newspapers to represent the LGBT community. Using the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), this qualitative research focuses on news articles published in 2023, drawing from three mainstream Malaysian newspapers: The Star Online, Harian Metro and China Press (). The findings show that nomination strategies categorize LGBT individuals through broad labels such as "LGBT" or specific terms like "gay" or "transgender." Predication strategies reinforce negative associations, often depicting LGBT individuals as morally or culturally deviant. Argumentation strategies reveal that conservative perspectives dominate, particularly those based on religious and cultural arguments, while economic, legal and human rights perspectives are present but are often secondary to traditional views. Perspectivization strategies highlight the use of authoritative voices, such as religious leaders and politicians, to legitimize dominant narratives. Intensification strategies, such as active verbs and augmentatives, highlight perceived risks linked to LGBT issues, while mitigation strategies, including modal verbs, allow newspapers to address these topics without taking a firm stance. Malaysian newspapers construct a layered portrayal of the LGBT community, framing them as distinct and as challenging norms while aligning narratives with cultural sensitivities, thereby reinforcing an "us" versus "them" dynamic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信