Truliant®全膝关节置换术植入物的短期生存研究

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kirstin Jones, Amber M Muehlmann, Mark Musgrave, Colin T Penrose
{"title":"Truliant®全膝关节置换术植入物的短期生存研究","authors":"Kirstin Jones, Amber M Muehlmann, Mark Musgrave, Colin T Penrose","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Truliant<sup>®</sup> posterior stabilized (PS) and Truliant cruciate retaining (CR) are two designs used for total knee arthroplasty. Survivorship and reason for revision rates are now available from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) at short-term time points for both Truliant designs. It was hypothesized that Truliant PS and Truliant CR perform comparably to similar designs in terms of survivorship.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze short-term survivorship of Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty relative to non-Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing data from the AJRR, a retrospective review was performed for subjects who underwent implantation of Truliant PS, Truliant CR, non-Truliant PS, and non-Truliant CR designs as of June 30, 2022. Survivorship and reasons for revision were compared statistically between Truliant PS <i>vs</i> non-Truliant PS as well as Truliant CR <i>vs</i> non-Truliant CR groups. Cumulative percent revision rates were compared across three registries, AJRR, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), and the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (UK NJR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Truliant PS survivorship was 97.95% at the four-year mark, while Truliant CR survivorship was 99.61% at the three-year mark. There were no significant differences in survivorship hazard ratios or reasons for revision for both Truliant groups <i>vs</i> non-Truliant comparison aggregate groups at short-term time points. Cumulative percent revision rate comparisons were made to device appropriate groups from AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR data. Truliant PS cumulative percent revision rates were similar to non-Truliant cumulative percent revision rates in the AJRR and similar to AOANJRR and UKNJR at both one and three years. Truliant CR cumulative percent revision rates were lower than aggregate AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR cumulative percent revision rates at the one-year and three-year marks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high survivorship for Truliant PS total knee arthroplasty out to four-years and Truliant CR total knee arthroplasty out to three-years of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 7","pages":"106281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term survivorship of Truliant<sup>®</sup> total knee arthroplasty implants utilizing the American Joint Replacement Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Kirstin Jones, Amber M Muehlmann, Mark Musgrave, Colin T Penrose\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Truliant<sup>®</sup> posterior stabilized (PS) and Truliant cruciate retaining (CR) are two designs used for total knee arthroplasty. Survivorship and reason for revision rates are now available from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) at short-term time points for both Truliant designs. It was hypothesized that Truliant PS and Truliant CR perform comparably to similar designs in terms of survivorship.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze short-term survivorship of Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty relative to non-Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing data from the AJRR, a retrospective review was performed for subjects who underwent implantation of Truliant PS, Truliant CR, non-Truliant PS, and non-Truliant CR designs as of June 30, 2022. Survivorship and reasons for revision were compared statistically between Truliant PS <i>vs</i> non-Truliant PS as well as Truliant CR <i>vs</i> non-Truliant CR groups. Cumulative percent revision rates were compared across three registries, AJRR, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), and the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (UK NJR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Truliant PS survivorship was 97.95% at the four-year mark, while Truliant CR survivorship was 99.61% at the three-year mark. There were no significant differences in survivorship hazard ratios or reasons for revision for both Truliant groups <i>vs</i> non-Truliant comparison aggregate groups at short-term time points. Cumulative percent revision rate comparisons were made to device appropriate groups from AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR data. Truliant PS cumulative percent revision rates were similar to non-Truliant cumulative percent revision rates in the AJRR and similar to AOANJRR and UKNJR at both one and three years. Truliant CR cumulative percent revision rates were lower than aggregate AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR cumulative percent revision rates at the one-year and three-year marks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high survivorship for Truliant PS total knee arthroplasty out to four-years and Truliant CR total knee arthroplasty out to three-years of follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"16 7\",\"pages\":\"106281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278276/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Truliant®后部稳定(PS)和Truliant十字保留(CR)是用于全膝关节置换术的两种设计。美国关节置换登记中心(AJRR)提供了两种Truliant设计的短期生存率和翻修率。假设在生存率方面,松效性PS和松效性CR的表现与类似的设计相当。目的:分析软性PS或CR全膝关节置换术与非软性PS或CR全膝关节置换术的短期生存率。方法:利用AJRR的数据,对截至2022年6月30日接受松效性PS、松效性CR、非松效性PS和非松效性CR植入的受试者进行回顾性分析。生存率和修订的原因在缓和性PS组与非缓和性PS组以及缓和性CR组与非缓和性CR组之间进行统计学比较。我们比较了AJRR、澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换注册中心(AOANJRR)和英国国家联合注册中心(UK NJR)三个注册中心的累计修正率。结果:4年生存率为97.95%,3年生存率为99.61%。在短期时间点上,两组患者的生存风险比和修订的原因没有显著差异。从AJRR、AOANJRR和UK NJR数据中进行器械适当组的累积修正率比较。在AJRR中,1年和3年的有效累积百分比修正率与非有效累积百分比修正率相似,与AOANJRR和UKNJR相似。在1年和3年的时间里,不稳定的CR累计修正率低于AJRR、AOANJRR和UK NJR累计修正率。结论:本研究表明,松效性PS全膝关节置换术4年生存率高,松效性CR全膝关节置换术3年生存率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Short-term survivorship of Truliant<sup>®</sup> total knee arthroplasty implants utilizing the American Joint Replacement Registry.

Short-term survivorship of Truliant® total knee arthroplasty implants utilizing the American Joint Replacement Registry.

Background: Truliant® posterior stabilized (PS) and Truliant cruciate retaining (CR) are two designs used for total knee arthroplasty. Survivorship and reason for revision rates are now available from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) at short-term time points for both Truliant designs. It was hypothesized that Truliant PS and Truliant CR perform comparably to similar designs in terms of survivorship.

Aim: To analyze short-term survivorship of Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty relative to non-Truliant PS or CR total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Utilizing data from the AJRR, a retrospective review was performed for subjects who underwent implantation of Truliant PS, Truliant CR, non-Truliant PS, and non-Truliant CR designs as of June 30, 2022. Survivorship and reasons for revision were compared statistically between Truliant PS vs non-Truliant PS as well as Truliant CR vs non-Truliant CR groups. Cumulative percent revision rates were compared across three registries, AJRR, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), and the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (UK NJR).

Results: Truliant PS survivorship was 97.95% at the four-year mark, while Truliant CR survivorship was 99.61% at the three-year mark. There were no significant differences in survivorship hazard ratios or reasons for revision for both Truliant groups vs non-Truliant comparison aggregate groups at short-term time points. Cumulative percent revision rate comparisons were made to device appropriate groups from AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR data. Truliant PS cumulative percent revision rates were similar to non-Truliant cumulative percent revision rates in the AJRR and similar to AOANJRR and UKNJR at both one and three years. Truliant CR cumulative percent revision rates were lower than aggregate AJRR, AOANJRR, and UK NJR cumulative percent revision rates at the one-year and three-year marks.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates high survivorship for Truliant PS total knee arthroplasty out to four-years and Truliant CR total knee arthroplasty out to three-years of follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信