爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛在医疗保健和精神保健方面能力有限的患者的决策权

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Solvita Olsena, Mari Amos, Inesa Fausch
{"title":"爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛在医疗保健和精神保健方面能力有限的患者的决策权","authors":"Solvita Olsena, Mari Amos, Inesa Fausch","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper analyses and compares the available legal frameworks that protect the autonomy and ensure decision-making rights in physical and mental healthcare for persons with mental disabilities in three Baltic countries - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The decision-making rights of persons with mental and psychosocial disabilities are examined in depth, with respect to the principles outlined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The research shows that none of the three Baltic States provide an adequate framework to enable every person with mental health difficulties the ability to exercise autonomous decision-making in healthcare and receive support when needed. There is an urgent need to reform healthcare legislation in all Baltic countries to ensure a paradigm shift towards a human rights-based approach that limits substituted decision-making and enables supported decision-making in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making Rights of Patients with Limited Capabilities in Healthcare and Mental Healthcare in Estonia, Latvia And Lithuania.\",\"authors\":\"Solvita Olsena, Mari Amos, Inesa Fausch\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718093-bja10152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The paper analyses and compares the available legal frameworks that protect the autonomy and ensure decision-making rights in physical and mental healthcare for persons with mental disabilities in three Baltic countries - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The decision-making rights of persons with mental and psychosocial disabilities are examined in depth, with respect to the principles outlined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The research shows that none of the three Baltic States provide an adequate framework to enable every person with mental health difficulties the ability to exercise autonomous decision-making in healthcare and receive support when needed. There is an urgent need to reform healthcare legislation in all Baltic countries to ensure a paradigm shift towards a human rights-based approach that limits substituted decision-making and enables supported decision-making in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析和比较了三个波罗的海国家————爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛————保护精神残疾者在身心保健方面的自主权和确保决策权的现有法律框架。根据《残疾人权利公约》概述的原则,对精神和社会心理残疾者的决策权进行了深入审查。研究表明,三个波罗的海国家都没有提供适当的框架,使每个有精神健康困难的人都有能力在保健方面自主决策,并在需要时获得支持。所有波罗的海国家都迫切需要改革保健立法,以确保范式转向基于人权的做法,限制替代决策,并使保健方面的决策能够得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-Making Rights of Patients with Limited Capabilities in Healthcare and Mental Healthcare in Estonia, Latvia And Lithuania.

The paper analyses and compares the available legal frameworks that protect the autonomy and ensure decision-making rights in physical and mental healthcare for persons with mental disabilities in three Baltic countries - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The decision-making rights of persons with mental and psychosocial disabilities are examined in depth, with respect to the principles outlined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The research shows that none of the three Baltic States provide an adequate framework to enable every person with mental health difficulties the ability to exercise autonomous decision-making in healthcare and receive support when needed. There is an urgent need to reform healthcare legislation in all Baltic countries to ensure a paradigm shift towards a human rights-based approach that limits substituted decision-making and enables supported decision-making in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信