泰国中小规模和大型奶牛场中耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感葡萄球菌的流行率和抗菌素耐药性。

IF 1.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf081
Nathita Phumthanakorn, Jitkamol Thanasak
{"title":"泰国中小规模和大型奶牛场中耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感葡萄球菌的流行率和抗菌素耐药性。","authors":"Nathita Phumthanakorn, Jitkamol Thanasak","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Thailand, small- to medium-scale (SM) dairy farms typically have fewer than 100 cows. They are often family-owned or independently operated, and vary in infrastructure and mechanization depending on their size. In contrast, large-scale (L) farms, with more than 100 cows, are more industrialized, utilizing advanced technology, higher production systems, and usually employ multiple workers. To date, few studies have reported the prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) and methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (MSS) and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at different farm scales. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus spp.</i>, MRS, MSS and their AMR as well as their genetic backgrounds on SM and L dairy farms in Thailand. A total of 157 mastitis milk samples were collected from 106 cows on 42 SM farms, and 65 samples from 37 cows on one L farm, all located in Kanchanaburi Province. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration. Whole-genome sequencing and analysis were performed for genetic characterization. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. on L farm (26.2%) and SM farms (14%) (<i>P</i> = 0.031, χ² test). The phenotypic resistance of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in L farm (58.8%) was significantly greater than that in SM farms (27.3%) (<i>P</i> = 0.049, χ² test). Six methicillin-resistant staphylococci (27.3%), including <i>Staph. haemolyticus</i> sequence type (ST) 3 (N = 1) and ST42 (N = 3) and <i>Staph. epidermidis</i> ST59 (N = 2) were discovered on SM farms, whereas a single <i>Staph. aureus</i> ST398 (5.9%, N = 1) was found on an L farm. These strains were multidrug-resistant and carried multiple, diverse antimicrobial resistance genes, including β-lactam resistance genes (<i>mecA</i>, <i>blaZ</i>), tetracycline resistance genes [<i>tet</i>(K), <i>tet</i>(M)], and macrolide resistance genes [<i>msr</i>(A), <i>mph</i>(C)]. Compared with MRS, MSS carried fewer diverse antimicrobial resistance genes and had distinct STs at both farm scales. At each farm scale, a particular type of resistance may originate from a certain species or specific ST. In conclusion, the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. and their resistance traits and genetic background on SM and L farms differ according to different production farm scales. The specific management and monitoring of the information on <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. circulated on each farm type could help to limit the spread of antimicrobial-resistant staphylococci.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf081"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus</i> in small- to medium-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Thailand.\",\"authors\":\"Nathita Phumthanakorn, Jitkamol Thanasak\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Thailand, small- to medium-scale (SM) dairy farms typically have fewer than 100 cows. They are often family-owned or independently operated, and vary in infrastructure and mechanization depending on their size. In contrast, large-scale (L) farms, with more than 100 cows, are more industrialized, utilizing advanced technology, higher production systems, and usually employ multiple workers. To date, few studies have reported the prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) and methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (MSS) and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at different farm scales. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus spp.</i>, MRS, MSS and their AMR as well as their genetic backgrounds on SM and L dairy farms in Thailand. A total of 157 mastitis milk samples were collected from 106 cows on 42 SM farms, and 65 samples from 37 cows on one L farm, all located in Kanchanaburi Province. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration. Whole-genome sequencing and analysis were performed for genetic characterization. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. on L farm (26.2%) and SM farms (14%) (<i>P</i> = 0.031, χ² test). The phenotypic resistance of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in L farm (58.8%) was significantly greater than that in SM farms (27.3%) (<i>P</i> = 0.049, χ² test). Six methicillin-resistant staphylococci (27.3%), including <i>Staph. haemolyticus</i> sequence type (ST) 3 (N = 1) and ST42 (N = 3) and <i>Staph. epidermidis</i> ST59 (N = 2) were discovered on SM farms, whereas a single <i>Staph. aureus</i> ST398 (5.9%, N = 1) was found on an L farm. These strains were multidrug-resistant and carried multiple, diverse antimicrobial resistance genes, including β-lactam resistance genes (<i>mecA</i>, <i>blaZ</i>), tetracycline resistance genes [<i>tet</i>(K), <i>tet</i>(M)], and macrolide resistance genes [<i>msr</i>(A), <i>mph</i>(C)]. Compared with MRS, MSS carried fewer diverse antimicrobial resistance genes and had distinct STs at both farm scales. At each farm scale, a particular type of resistance may originate from a certain species or specific ST. In conclusion, the prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. and their resistance traits and genetic background on SM and L farms differ according to different production farm scales. The specific management and monitoring of the information on <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. circulated on each farm type could help to limit the spread of antimicrobial-resistant staphylococci.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280273/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在泰国,中小型(SM)奶牛场通常只有不到100头奶牛。它们往往是家族所有或独立经营的,基础设施和机械化程度因规模而异。相比之下,拥有100头以上奶牛的大型(L)农场更加工业化,利用先进的技术,更高的生产系统,通常雇用多名工人。迄今为止,很少有研究报道耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌(MRS)和甲氧西林敏感葡萄球菌(MSS)在不同农场规模的流行情况及其抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)。本研究旨在调查泰国SM和L奶牛场葡萄球菌、MRS、MSS及其AMR的流行情况及遗传背景。在北碧府42个SM农场的106头奶牛和1个L农场的37头奶牛中共采集了157份乳腺炎乳样本。通过测定最小抑菌浓度进行药敏试验。全基因组测序和分析进行遗传表征。L养殖场葡萄球菌感染率为26.2%,SM养殖场为14%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.031, χ 2检验)。L养殖场对甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑的表型抗性为58.8%,显著高于SM养殖场(27.3%)(P = 0.049, χ 2检验)。6种耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌(27.3%),包括葡萄球菌。溶血菌序列型(ST) 3 (N = 1)、ST42 (N = 3)和葡萄球菌。在SM养殖场中检出表皮球菌ST59 (N = 2),而葡萄球菌1株。金黄色葡萄球菌ST398 (5.9%, N = 1)在L农场检出。这些菌株为多药耐药,携带多种多样的耐药基因,包括β-内酰胺类耐药基因(mecA、blaZ)、四环素类耐药基因[tet(K)、tet(M)]和大环内酯类耐药基因[msr(A)、mph(C)]。与MRS相比,MSS携带的抗菌素耐药基因种类较少,在两个农场规模上具有明显的STs。在每个养殖场规模下,某一特定类型的耐药可能来源于某一菌种或特定的ST.。综上所述,不同养殖场规模下,SM和L养殖场葡萄球菌的流行情况、耐药性状和遗传背景存在差异。对各养殖场传播的葡萄球菌信息进行具体管理和监测,有助于限制耐药葡萄球菌的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus</i> in small- to medium-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Thailand.

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus</i> in small- to medium-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Thailand.

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus</i> in small- to medium-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Thailand.

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus in small- to medium-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Thailand.

In Thailand, small- to medium-scale (SM) dairy farms typically have fewer than 100 cows. They are often family-owned or independently operated, and vary in infrastructure and mechanization depending on their size. In contrast, large-scale (L) farms, with more than 100 cows, are more industrialized, utilizing advanced technology, higher production systems, and usually employ multiple workers. To date, few studies have reported the prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) and methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (MSS) and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at different farm scales. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Staphylococcus spp., MRS, MSS and their AMR as well as their genetic backgrounds on SM and L dairy farms in Thailand. A total of 157 mastitis milk samples were collected from 106 cows on 42 SM farms, and 65 samples from 37 cows on one L farm, all located in Kanchanaburi Province. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration. Whole-genome sequencing and analysis were performed for genetic characterization. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. on L farm (26.2%) and SM farms (14%) (P = 0.031, χ² test). The phenotypic resistance of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in L farm (58.8%) was significantly greater than that in SM farms (27.3%) (P = 0.049, χ² test). Six methicillin-resistant staphylococci (27.3%), including Staph. haemolyticus sequence type (ST) 3 (N = 1) and ST42 (N = 3) and Staph. epidermidis ST59 (N = 2) were discovered on SM farms, whereas a single Staph. aureus ST398 (5.9%, N = 1) was found on an L farm. These strains were multidrug-resistant and carried multiple, diverse antimicrobial resistance genes, including β-lactam resistance genes (mecA, blaZ), tetracycline resistance genes [tet(K), tet(M)], and macrolide resistance genes [msr(A), mph(C)]. Compared with MRS, MSS carried fewer diverse antimicrobial resistance genes and had distinct STs at both farm scales. At each farm scale, a particular type of resistance may originate from a certain species or specific ST. In conclusion, the prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. and their resistance traits and genetic background on SM and L farms differ according to different production farm scales. The specific management and monitoring of the information on Staphylococcus spp. circulated on each farm type could help to limit the spread of antimicrobial-resistant staphylococci.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信