Frank W Roemer, Stephanie Kast, Wolfgang Kemmler, Jamie E Collins, Klaus Engelke, Ali Guermazi, Michael Uder, Simon von Stengel
{"title":"全身肌电刺激对膝骨关节炎的结构效应:EMSOAT研究。","authors":"Frank W Roemer, Stephanie Kast, Wolfgang Kemmler, Jamie E Collins, Klaus Engelke, Ali Guermazi, Michael Uder, Simon von Stengel","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04984-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) might be an alternative option to conventional strength training for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our aim was to compare structural changes of knee OA between patients treated with WB-EMS and a control group (CG) treated with a standard of care approach.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seventy-two overweight participants with symptomatic knee OA were assigned to either WB-EMS or CG. MRIs were acquired at baseline and 7 months using a 3 T system. MRIs were read according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Between-group differences in regard to change in cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, meniscus damage and extrusion, and markers of inflammation were analyzed using Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer knees in the WB-EMS groups showed cartilage worsening compared to the CG (18% vs. 40%, p = 0.046). There were fewer knees in the WB-EMS group showing an increase in BML size score of ≥ 1 (30% vs 46%, p = 0.43). Regarding prevalent BMLs that showed improvement, no change, or worsening, no differences were seen (p = 0.56). Little osteophyte and meniscal changes were observed during the observational period. Differences regarding change in inflammatory markers were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there was a difference with fewer subregions showing worsening cartilage damage in the WB-EMS group, no significant differences were observed for change in BMLs, inflammation, osteophytes, and meniscal parameters. The observed improvement in clinical outcome parameters in favor of the WB-EMS group is likely due to other effects than improvement or less worsening of structural changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2579-2588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural effects of whole body electromyostimulation on knee osteoarthritis: the EMSOAT Study.\",\"authors\":\"Frank W Roemer, Stephanie Kast, Wolfgang Kemmler, Jamie E Collins, Klaus Engelke, Ali Guermazi, Michael Uder, Simon von Stengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-025-04984-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) might be an alternative option to conventional strength training for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our aim was to compare structural changes of knee OA between patients treated with WB-EMS and a control group (CG) treated with a standard of care approach.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seventy-two overweight participants with symptomatic knee OA were assigned to either WB-EMS or CG. MRIs were acquired at baseline and 7 months using a 3 T system. MRIs were read according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Between-group differences in regard to change in cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, meniscus damage and extrusion, and markers of inflammation were analyzed using Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer knees in the WB-EMS groups showed cartilage worsening compared to the CG (18% vs. 40%, p = 0.046). There were fewer knees in the WB-EMS group showing an increase in BML size score of ≥ 1 (30% vs 46%, p = 0.43). Regarding prevalent BMLs that showed improvement, no change, or worsening, no differences were seen (p = 0.56). Little osteophyte and meniscal changes were observed during the observational period. Differences regarding change in inflammatory markers were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there was a difference with fewer subregions showing worsening cartilage damage in the WB-EMS group, no significant differences were observed for change in BMLs, inflammation, osteophytes, and meniscal parameters. The observed improvement in clinical outcome parameters in favor of the WB-EMS group is likely due to other effects than improvement or less worsening of structural changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2579-2588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04984-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04984-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:全身肌电刺激(WB-EMS)可能是膝骨关节炎(OA)患者常规力量训练的替代选择。我们的目的是比较接受WB-EMS治疗的患者和接受标准护理方法治疗的对照组(CG)之间膝关节OA的结构变化。材料和方法:72名患有症状性膝关节炎的超重参与者被分配到WB-EMS或CG组。在基线和7个月时使用3t系统获得mri。根据MRI骨关节炎膝关节评分仪(MOAKS)读取MRI。使用Fisher's Exact和Wilcoxon秩和检验分析各组间软骨、骨髓病变(BMLs)、骨赘、半月板损伤和挤压以及炎症标志物的变化。结果:与CG组相比,WB-EMS组出现软骨恶化的膝关节较少(18% vs. 40%, p = 0.046)。WB-EMS组膝关节数量较少,BML大小评分增加≥1 (30% vs 46%, p = 0.43)。对于表现出改善、无变化或恶化的流行bml,没有观察到差异(p = 0.56)。观察期间骨赘和半月板变化不大。炎症标志物的变化差异不显著。结论:虽然WB-EMS组软骨损伤加重的亚区较少,但bml、炎症、骨赘和半月板参数的变化无显著差异。观察到的临床结果参数的改善对WB-EMS组有利,可能是由于其他作用而不是结构改变的改善或更少的恶化。
Structural effects of whole body electromyostimulation on knee osteoarthritis: the EMSOAT Study.
Objective: Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) might be an alternative option to conventional strength training for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our aim was to compare structural changes of knee OA between patients treated with WB-EMS and a control group (CG) treated with a standard of care approach.
Material and methods: Seventy-two overweight participants with symptomatic knee OA were assigned to either WB-EMS or CG. MRIs were acquired at baseline and 7 months using a 3 T system. MRIs were read according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Between-group differences in regard to change in cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, meniscus damage and extrusion, and markers of inflammation were analyzed using Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.
Results: Fewer knees in the WB-EMS groups showed cartilage worsening compared to the CG (18% vs. 40%, p = 0.046). There were fewer knees in the WB-EMS group showing an increase in BML size score of ≥ 1 (30% vs 46%, p = 0.43). Regarding prevalent BMLs that showed improvement, no change, or worsening, no differences were seen (p = 0.56). Little osteophyte and meniscal changes were observed during the observational period. Differences regarding change in inflammatory markers were not significant.
Conclusion: While there was a difference with fewer subregions showing worsening cartilage damage in the WB-EMS group, no significant differences were observed for change in BMLs, inflammation, osteophytes, and meniscal parameters. The observed improvement in clinical outcome parameters in favor of the WB-EMS group is likely due to other effects than improvement or less worsening of structural changes.
期刊介绍:
Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration.
This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.