COVID-19阳性状态对脑卒中患者急性住院康复预后的影响

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13435
Amy Ziems, Christopher J McLouth, Nicholas Elwert, Elissa Charbonneau, Joseph Stillo, Susan McDowell
{"title":"COVID-19阳性状态对脑卒中患者急性住院康复预后的影响","authors":"Amy Ziems, Christopher J McLouth, Nicholas Elwert, Elissa Charbonneau, Joseph Stillo, Susan McDowell","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke, whether or not accompanied by concurrent COVID-19 infection, has been associated with varying acute care outcomes, with patients who are COVID-19 positive typically faring worse. This study aims to explore the functional outcomes of patients with stroke -with and without simultaneous COVID-19 infection-who survived their acute care stay and progressed to acute inpatient rehabilitation (IRF).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify differences in sociodemographic factors, medical complexity, and rehabilitation outcomes from an IRF stay between patients with stroke with concurrent COVID-19 and those without.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, observational cohort study using electronic medical records (EMR) data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>EMR data from 138 IRFs across 34 states of the United States and Puerto Rico involving 40,282 individuals following stroke discharged between April 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 of whom 1483 (3.7%) were COVID-19 positive.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Variables collected included sociodemographic and medical complexity along with outcome variable categories included functional complexity, process outcomes, and functional abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between the two groups using standardized effect sizes >0.2. COVID-19 positive patients with stroke had more comorbidities (94.1% vs. 51.8%, standardized effect = 1.1), lower admission mobility (26 vs. 30, standardized effect = 0.27), lower discharge mobility scores (56 vs. 65, standardized effect = 0.27), and a longer IRF stay (17 days vs. 14 days, standardized effect = 0.30). They also were less likely to return to the community (65.5% vs. 78.3%) but had a higher acute care transfer rate (19.1% vs. 10.6%). Logistic regression showed that Hispanic COVID-positive individuals and those with higher mobility scores were more likely to be discharged to the community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are meaningful differences in rehabilitation outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative individuals with stroke that clinicians can use to better understand, anticipate and mitigate outcome challenges facing the COVID-19 positive population with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 positive status on outcome for individuals with stroke treated in acute inpatient rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Ziems, Christopher J McLouth, Nicholas Elwert, Elissa Charbonneau, Joseph Stillo, Susan McDowell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke, whether or not accompanied by concurrent COVID-19 infection, has been associated with varying acute care outcomes, with patients who are COVID-19 positive typically faring worse. This study aims to explore the functional outcomes of patients with stroke -with and without simultaneous COVID-19 infection-who survived their acute care stay and progressed to acute inpatient rehabilitation (IRF).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify differences in sociodemographic factors, medical complexity, and rehabilitation outcomes from an IRF stay between patients with stroke with concurrent COVID-19 and those without.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, observational cohort study using electronic medical records (EMR) data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>EMR data from 138 IRFs across 34 states of the United States and Puerto Rico involving 40,282 individuals following stroke discharged between April 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 of whom 1483 (3.7%) were COVID-19 positive.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Variables collected included sociodemographic and medical complexity along with outcome variable categories included functional complexity, process outcomes, and functional abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between the two groups using standardized effect sizes >0.2. COVID-19 positive patients with stroke had more comorbidities (94.1% vs. 51.8%, standardized effect = 1.1), lower admission mobility (26 vs. 30, standardized effect = 0.27), lower discharge mobility scores (56 vs. 65, standardized effect = 0.27), and a longer IRF stay (17 days vs. 14 days, standardized effect = 0.30). They also were less likely to return to the community (65.5% vs. 78.3%) but had a higher acute care transfer rate (19.1% vs. 10.6%). Logistic regression showed that Hispanic COVID-positive individuals and those with higher mobility scores were more likely to be discharged to the community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are meaningful differences in rehabilitation outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative individuals with stroke that clinicians can use to better understand, anticipate and mitigate outcome challenges facing the COVID-19 positive population with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卒中,无论是否同时伴有COVID-19感染,都与不同的急性护理结果相关,COVID-19阳性患者的情况通常更糟。本研究旨在探讨卒中患者(伴有和不伴有COVID-19感染)在急性护理期间存活并进展到急性住院康复(IRF)的功能结局。目的:确定合并COVID-19的脑卒中患者与未合并COVID-19的脑卒中患者在IRF住院期间的社会人口学因素、医疗复杂性和康复结果的差异。设计:采用电子病历(EMR)数据进行回顾性、观察性队列研究。背景:来自美国34个州和波多黎各的138个irf的EMR数据,涉及2020年4月1日至2021年5月31日期间中风出院的40282人,其中1483人(3.7%)为COVID-19阳性。参与者:NA。干预措施:NA。主要结果测量:收集的变量包括社会人口统计学和医学复杂性,结果变量类别包括功能复杂性、过程结果和功能能力。结果:采用标准化效应量>0.2,两组间存在显著差异。COVID-19阳性脑卒中患者共病较多(94.1%比51.8%,标准化效应= 1.1),入院活动能力较低(26比30,标准化效应= 0.27),出院活动能力评分较低(56比65,标准化效应= 0.27),IRF住院时间较长(17天比14天,标准化效应= 0.30)。他们返回社区的可能性也较低(65.5%对78.3%),但急症转院率较高(19.1%对10.6%)。Logistic回归显示,西班牙裔新冠病毒阳性个体和流动性得分较高的个体更有可能出院。结论:COVID-19阳性和阴性脑卒中患者的康复结果存在显著差异,临床医生可以利用这些差异更好地了解、预测和减轻COVID-19阳性脑卒中患者面临的预后挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 positive status on outcome for individuals with stroke treated in acute inpatient rehabilitation.

Background: Stroke, whether or not accompanied by concurrent COVID-19 infection, has been associated with varying acute care outcomes, with patients who are COVID-19 positive typically faring worse. This study aims to explore the functional outcomes of patients with stroke -with and without simultaneous COVID-19 infection-who survived their acute care stay and progressed to acute inpatient rehabilitation (IRF).

Objectives: To identify differences in sociodemographic factors, medical complexity, and rehabilitation outcomes from an IRF stay between patients with stroke with concurrent COVID-19 and those without.

Design: A retrospective, observational cohort study using electronic medical records (EMR) data.

Setting: EMR data from 138 IRFs across 34 states of the United States and Puerto Rico involving 40,282 individuals following stroke discharged between April 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 of whom 1483 (3.7%) were COVID-19 positive.

Participants: NA.

Interventions: NA.

Main outcome measures: Variables collected included sociodemographic and medical complexity along with outcome variable categories included functional complexity, process outcomes, and functional abilities.

Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups using standardized effect sizes >0.2. COVID-19 positive patients with stroke had more comorbidities (94.1% vs. 51.8%, standardized effect = 1.1), lower admission mobility (26 vs. 30, standardized effect = 0.27), lower discharge mobility scores (56 vs. 65, standardized effect = 0.27), and a longer IRF stay (17 days vs. 14 days, standardized effect = 0.30). They also were less likely to return to the community (65.5% vs. 78.3%) but had a higher acute care transfer rate (19.1% vs. 10.6%). Logistic regression showed that Hispanic COVID-positive individuals and those with higher mobility scores were more likely to be discharged to the community.

Conclusions: There are meaningful differences in rehabilitation outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative individuals with stroke that clinicians can use to better understand, anticipate and mitigate outcome challenges facing the COVID-19 positive population with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信