Sophie J.A. Jooren , Heike H. Garritsen , Sigrid Troelstra , Willeke van Dijk , Maria W.J. Jansen , Marc C. Willemsen , Jeroen Bommelé
{"title":"在室外环境中遵守无烟政策:一个现实的回顾。","authors":"Sophie J.A. Jooren , Heike H. Garritsen , Sigrid Troelstra , Willeke van Dijk , Maria W.J. Jansen , Marc C. Willemsen , Jeroen Bommelé","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although smoke-free outdoor environments are increasingly implemented to reduce adolescent smoking and de-normalize the behaviour, compliance is often low. To better understand compliance of people who smoke, we conducted a realist review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A realist review, a type of literature review, uses existing evidence to make a program theory, outlining mechanisms and contexts, that provides an explanatory analysis of compliance of people who smoke with outdoor smoke-free environments. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO. Studies were included that had been published from January 1, 2000, to September 1, 2023. Twenty-five peer-reviewed English-language articles were included. Evidence was extracted about contexts and mechanisms that influence the compliance of smokers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compliance with smoke-free outdoor environments increases if people who smoke accept the policy, have sufficient knowledge and when the policy affects their motivation to quit smoking. However, these mechanisms may be hindered by feelings of people who smoke, such as low confidence in the policy's effectiveness and enforcement, feelings of stigma, and a lack of understanding. The context in which these environments are implemented, such as communication about the smoke-free policy, the stop-smoking facilities, the presence of ashtrays and designated smoking areas, and the size of the environment, influences mechanisms and compliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To increase acceptance and clarity of smoke-free policies, we recommend implementing smoke-free outdoor policies without designated smoking areas or ashtrays while actively promoting public awareness. To avoid stigmatisation, accessible cessation support is key. Lastly, proper enforcement training is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 108361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance with smoke-free policies in outdoor settings: a realist review\",\"authors\":\"Sophie J.A. Jooren , Heike H. Garritsen , Sigrid Troelstra , Willeke van Dijk , Maria W.J. Jansen , Marc C. Willemsen , Jeroen Bommelé\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although smoke-free outdoor environments are increasingly implemented to reduce adolescent smoking and de-normalize the behaviour, compliance is often low. To better understand compliance of people who smoke, we conducted a realist review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A realist review, a type of literature review, uses existing evidence to make a program theory, outlining mechanisms and contexts, that provides an explanatory analysis of compliance of people who smoke with outdoor smoke-free environments. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO. Studies were included that had been published from January 1, 2000, to September 1, 2023. Twenty-five peer-reviewed English-language articles were included. Evidence was extracted about contexts and mechanisms that influence the compliance of smokers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compliance with smoke-free outdoor environments increases if people who smoke accept the policy, have sufficient knowledge and when the policy affects their motivation to quit smoking. However, these mechanisms may be hindered by feelings of people who smoke, such as low confidence in the policy's effectiveness and enforcement, feelings of stigma, and a lack of understanding. The context in which these environments are implemented, such as communication about the smoke-free policy, the stop-smoking facilities, the presence of ashtrays and designated smoking areas, and the size of the environment, influences mechanisms and compliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To increase acceptance and clarity of smoke-free policies, we recommend implementing smoke-free outdoor policies without designated smoking areas or ashtrays while actively promoting public awareness. To avoid stigmatisation, accessible cessation support is key. Lastly, proper enforcement training is essential.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743525001446\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743525001446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管越来越多地实施室外无烟环境以减少青少年吸烟并使其行为非常态化,但依从性往往很低。为了更好地了解吸烟者的依从性,我们进行了一项现实审查。方法:现实主义回顾,一种文献回顾,利用现有证据制定程序理论,概述机制和背景,为吸烟者对室外无烟环境的依从性提供解释性分析。在PubMed, Web of Science, Embase和PsycINFO中进行了搜索。研究纳入了2000年1月1日至2023年9月1日期间发表的研究。纳入了25篇同行评议的英文文章。提取了影响吸烟者依从性的背景和机制的证据。结果:当吸烟者接受政策,有足够的知识,当政策影响其戒烟动机时,对室外无烟环境的依从性增加。然而,这些机制可能会受到吸烟者的感受的阻碍,例如对政策的有效性和执行缺乏信心,污名感和缺乏理解。实施这些环境的背景,例如关于无烟政策的宣传、禁烟设施、烟灰缸和指定吸烟区的存在,以及环境的大小,都会影响机制和遵守情况。结论:为了提高公众对无烟政策的接受度和清晰度,我们建议在积极提高公众意识的同时,实施无指定吸烟区和烟灰缸的室外无烟政策。为避免污名化,获得戒烟支持是关键。最后,适当的执法培训是必不可少的。
Compliance with smoke-free policies in outdoor settings: a realist review
Objective
Although smoke-free outdoor environments are increasingly implemented to reduce adolescent smoking and de-normalize the behaviour, compliance is often low. To better understand compliance of people who smoke, we conducted a realist review.
Methods
A realist review, a type of literature review, uses existing evidence to make a program theory, outlining mechanisms and contexts, that provides an explanatory analysis of compliance of people who smoke with outdoor smoke-free environments. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO. Studies were included that had been published from January 1, 2000, to September 1, 2023. Twenty-five peer-reviewed English-language articles were included. Evidence was extracted about contexts and mechanisms that influence the compliance of smokers.
Results
Compliance with smoke-free outdoor environments increases if people who smoke accept the policy, have sufficient knowledge and when the policy affects their motivation to quit smoking. However, these mechanisms may be hindered by feelings of people who smoke, such as low confidence in the policy's effectiveness and enforcement, feelings of stigma, and a lack of understanding. The context in which these environments are implemented, such as communication about the smoke-free policy, the stop-smoking facilities, the presence of ashtrays and designated smoking areas, and the size of the environment, influences mechanisms and compliance.
Conclusions
To increase acceptance and clarity of smoke-free policies, we recommend implementing smoke-free outdoor policies without designated smoking areas or ashtrays while actively promoting public awareness. To avoid stigmatisation, accessible cessation support is key. Lastly, proper enforcement training is essential.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.