工作场所惯用手与颈/肩疼痛的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yukiko Ogawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takeshi Ebara, Junko Nakatani, Koji Mori, For The W S-Ohpm Ii Study
{"title":"工作场所惯用手与颈/肩疼痛的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yukiko Ogawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takeshi Ebara, Junko Nakatani, Koji Mori, For The W S-Ohpm Ii Study","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between one's dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to explore the relationship between one's dominant hand and the severity of neck/shoulder pain. We also examined the relationship between the dominant hand and the onset of neck/shoulder pain at the follow-up among workers without neck/shoulder pain at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of 9,451 workers. The dominant hand is measured by ten items from the Japanese version of the Flanders Questionnaire at the baseline survey. We assessed neck/shoulder pain using a numeric rating scale. We calculated the unstandardized coefficient (B) using multiple regression analysis and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for neck/shoulder pain using modified Poisson regression among workers who were free of neck/shoulder pain at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 9,451 respondents for the baseline survey, 6,156 responded to the follow-up survey (response rate: 65.1%). Mixed-handed workers report a higher degree of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers (B, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58). Among 2,481 participants, mixed-handed workers also had a higher IRR for neck/shoulder pain (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). There was no difference in any of the left-handers compared with the right-handers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that mixed-handed workers had higher levels of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers, and the incidence rate was also higher among mixed-handed workers. Employers should consider these findings when designing work environments, managing tasks, and providing occupational health training to optimise worker comfort and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between the dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain in the workplace: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yukiko Ogawa, Tomohisa Nagata, Kiminori Odagami, Takeshi Ebara, Junko Nakatani, Koji Mori, For The W S-Ohpm Ii Study\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between one's dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to explore the relationship between one's dominant hand and the severity of neck/shoulder pain. We also examined the relationship between the dominant hand and the onset of neck/shoulder pain at the follow-up among workers without neck/shoulder pain at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of 9,451 workers. The dominant hand is measured by ten items from the Japanese version of the Flanders Questionnaire at the baseline survey. We assessed neck/shoulder pain using a numeric rating scale. We calculated the unstandardized coefficient (B) using multiple regression analysis and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for neck/shoulder pain using modified Poisson regression among workers who were free of neck/shoulder pain at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 9,451 respondents for the baseline survey, 6,156 responded to the follow-up survey (response rate: 65.1%). Mixed-handed workers report a higher degree of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers (B, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58). Among 2,481 participants, mixed-handed workers also had a higher IRR for neck/shoulder pain (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). There was no difference in any of the left-handers compared with the right-handers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that mixed-handed workers had higher levels of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers, and the incidence rate was also higher among mixed-handed workers. Employers should consider these findings when designing work environments, managing tasks, and providing occupational health training to optimise worker comfort and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:到目前为止,还没有研究调查一个人的惯用手和颈/肩疼痛之间的关系。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是探讨一个人的优势手和颈/肩疼痛的严重程度之间的关系。我们还研究了在基线时无颈肩痛的工人中,优势手与颈肩痛发病之间的关系。方法:我们对9451名工人进行了前瞻性队列研究。在基线调查中,用日本版法兰德斯问卷中的10个项目来测量优势手。我们使用数字评定量表评估颈部/肩部疼痛。我们使用多元回归分析计算了非标准化系数(B),并使用修正泊松回归计算了基线时无颈肩痛的工人的颈肩痛发病率比(IRR)。结果:在基线调查的9451名受访者中,有6156名回复了后续调查,回复率为65.1%。与右撇子工人相比,双手混合的工人报告的颈/肩疼痛程度更高(B, 0.33;95% ci, 0.09-0.58)。在2481名参与者中,双手混合工作的人脖子/肩膀疼痛的IRR也更高(IRR, 1.27;95% ci, 1.01-1.61)。与右撇子相比,左撇子和右撇子在任何方面都没有区别。结论:本研究发现,惯用手的工人颈肩疼痛程度高于惯用右手的工人,其发病率也高于惯用手的工人。雇主在设计工作环境、管理任务和提供职业健康培训时应考虑这些发现,以优化工人的舒适度和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between the dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain in the workplace: a prospective cohort study.

Background: To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between one's dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to explore the relationship between one's dominant hand and the severity of neck/shoulder pain. We also examined the relationship between the dominant hand and the onset of neck/shoulder pain at the follow-up among workers without neck/shoulder pain at baseline.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 9,451 workers. The dominant hand is measured by ten items from the Japanese version of the Flanders Questionnaire at the baseline survey. We assessed neck/shoulder pain using a numeric rating scale. We calculated the unstandardized coefficient (B) using multiple regression analysis and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for neck/shoulder pain using modified Poisson regression among workers who were free of neck/shoulder pain at baseline.

Results: Among the 9,451 respondents for the baseline survey, 6,156 responded to the follow-up survey (response rate: 65.1%). Mixed-handed workers report a higher degree of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers (B, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58). Among 2,481 participants, mixed-handed workers also had a higher IRR for neck/shoulder pain (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). There was no difference in any of the left-handers compared with the right-handers.

Conclusions: The study found that mixed-handed workers had higher levels of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers, and the incidence rate was also higher among mixed-handed workers. Employers should consider these findings when designing work environments, managing tasks, and providing occupational health training to optimise worker comfort and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信