Matthäus Felsenstein , Sophie Dorfer , Ann-Christin Amini , Regina Stegherr , Aboelyazid Elkilany , Niklas M. Stephan Mirwald , Uli Fehrenbach , Dou Ma , Cao Z. Jing Jin , Mengwen Hu , Ruonan Wang , Lea Timmermann , Karl H. Hillebrandt , Ulrike Grittner , Igor M. Sauer , Christian Jürgensen , Johann Pratschke , Thomas Malinka
{"title":"内镜下与经皮引流放置左侧胰腺切除术后:多状态模型定义胰瘘介入治疗的客观变量。","authors":"Matthäus Felsenstein , Sophie Dorfer , Ann-Christin Amini , Regina Stegherr , Aboelyazid Elkilany , Niklas M. Stephan Mirwald , Uli Fehrenbach , Dou Ma , Cao Z. Jing Jin , Mengwen Hu , Ruonan Wang , Lea Timmermann , Karl H. Hillebrandt , Ulrike Grittner , Igor M. Sauer , Christian Jürgensen , Johann Pratschke , Thomas Malinka","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a prevalent complication after left-sided pancreatectomy. Interventional treatment is regularly required and relies on interdisciplinary concepts, including interventional radiology and endoscopy. Evidence on the correct indication and clinical algorithms for available treatment modalities are needed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>During a 5-year observational period, we followed the clinical courses of 200 patients after left-sided pancreatectomy. Patients who fulfilled clinical and radiographic criteria for interventionally-relevant(IR-) POPF were identified. Interventional treatment groups were stratified via established step-up concepts for descriptive analyses and via a decision-based algorithm for comparative analyses. We used a Multi-State Time-to-Event Model (MSM) to assess clinical resolution efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following surgery, patients with IR-POPF needed multiple (58.2 %) and multimodal (49.4 %) interventions to achieve final resolution. Technical success rates were higher in ED (57.7 %) versus PD (32.7 %), and resulted in earlier resolution (8.4d, 95%C [5.5–11.2d]) when compared to the PD group (23.4d, 95%CI[2.8–17.9d]). At any given time, probability of reaching clinical resolution were higher for ED in multifaceted MSM analysis (HR 1.39, 95%CI[0.854, 2.25]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present study highlights the importance of endoscopy-guided drainage placement after left-sided pancreatic resection. CRP value appeared to be a single objectifiable parameter for optimized treatment allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 10","pages":"Pages 1270-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage placement after left-sided pancreatectomy: multi-state model for defining objectifiable variables on interventional treatment for pancreatic fistula\",\"authors\":\"Matthäus Felsenstein , Sophie Dorfer , Ann-Christin Amini , Regina Stegherr , Aboelyazid Elkilany , Niklas M. Stephan Mirwald , Uli Fehrenbach , Dou Ma , Cao Z. Jing Jin , Mengwen Hu , Ruonan Wang , Lea Timmermann , Karl H. Hillebrandt , Ulrike Grittner , Igor M. Sauer , Christian Jürgensen , Johann Pratschke , Thomas Malinka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a prevalent complication after left-sided pancreatectomy. Interventional treatment is regularly required and relies on interdisciplinary concepts, including interventional radiology and endoscopy. Evidence on the correct indication and clinical algorithms for available treatment modalities are needed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>During a 5-year observational period, we followed the clinical courses of 200 patients after left-sided pancreatectomy. Patients who fulfilled clinical and radiographic criteria for interventionally-relevant(IR-) POPF were identified. Interventional treatment groups were stratified via established step-up concepts for descriptive analyses and via a decision-based algorithm for comparative analyses. We used a Multi-State Time-to-Event Model (MSM) to assess clinical resolution efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following surgery, patients with IR-POPF needed multiple (58.2 %) and multimodal (49.4 %) interventions to achieve final resolution. Technical success rates were higher in ED (57.7 %) versus PD (32.7 %), and resulted in earlier resolution (8.4d, 95%C [5.5–11.2d]) when compared to the PD group (23.4d, 95%CI[2.8–17.9d]). At any given time, probability of reaching clinical resolution were higher for ED in multifaceted MSM analysis (HR 1.39, 95%CI[0.854, 2.25]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present study highlights the importance of endoscopy-guided drainage placement after left-sided pancreatic resection. CRP value appeared to be a single objectifiable parameter for optimized treatment allocation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hpb\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1270-1280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hpb\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X25006422\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X25006422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage placement after left-sided pancreatectomy: multi-state model for defining objectifiable variables on interventional treatment for pancreatic fistula
Background
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a prevalent complication after left-sided pancreatectomy. Interventional treatment is regularly required and relies on interdisciplinary concepts, including interventional radiology and endoscopy. Evidence on the correct indication and clinical algorithms for available treatment modalities are needed.
Methods
During a 5-year observational period, we followed the clinical courses of 200 patients after left-sided pancreatectomy. Patients who fulfilled clinical and radiographic criteria for interventionally-relevant(IR-) POPF were identified. Interventional treatment groups were stratified via established step-up concepts for descriptive analyses and via a decision-based algorithm for comparative analyses. We used a Multi-State Time-to-Event Model (MSM) to assess clinical resolution efficacy.
Results
Following surgery, patients with IR-POPF needed multiple (58.2 %) and multimodal (49.4 %) interventions to achieve final resolution. Technical success rates were higher in ED (57.7 %) versus PD (32.7 %), and resulted in earlier resolution (8.4d, 95%C [5.5–11.2d]) when compared to the PD group (23.4d, 95%CI[2.8–17.9d]). At any given time, probability of reaching clinical resolution were higher for ED in multifaceted MSM analysis (HR 1.39, 95%CI[0.854, 2.25]).
Conclusion
The present study highlights the importance of endoscopy-guided drainage placement after left-sided pancreatic resection. CRP value appeared to be a single objectifiable parameter for optimized treatment allocation.
期刊介绍:
HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication.
Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice.
Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice.
HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields.
Abstracted and Indexed in:
MEDLINE®
EMBASE
PubMed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Academic Search (EBSCO)
HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).