剖宫产术中麻醉类型对产妇和新生儿预后的影响。

Q4 Medicine
Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2025-04-01
A Al-Sanjary
{"title":"剖宫产术中麻醉类型对产妇和新生儿预后的影响。","authors":"A Al-Sanjary","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of caesarean section has been increased globally all over the world and the type of anesthesia can affect both maternal and fetal health. For years the general anesthesia has been used as a method of choice during caesarean section with many complications especially in emergency caesarean section, were as spinal anesthesia, a type of regional anesthesia, that has been tried in the last two decades may provide anesthesia without these complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized cohort study, performed in women health private hospital between Sep. 2023-Sep. 2024. for 200 term pregnant women attending for elective cesarean section, 100 women undergoes spinal anesthesia and 100 women undergoes general anesthesia. Those women with any risk factor that affect study parameters as preterm baby or placenta previa were excluded from the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis shows non-significant difference in age and parity among the groups with no significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate after operation the mean volume of intraoperative blood loss and the mean decline in hemoglobin is higher in general anesthesia group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spinal anesthesia provides better outcome regarding lower intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, higher fetal Apgar score at 1st minutes, with similar haemodynamic stability. It is a better option for cesarean section anesthesia reducing morbidity and mortality from the increasingly performed operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 361","pages":"185-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOME ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF ANESTHESIA DURING CAESAREAN SECTION.\",\"authors\":\"A Al-Sanjary\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of caesarean section has been increased globally all over the world and the type of anesthesia can affect both maternal and fetal health. For years the general anesthesia has been used as a method of choice during caesarean section with many complications especially in emergency caesarean section, were as spinal anesthesia, a type of regional anesthesia, that has been tried in the last two decades may provide anesthesia without these complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized cohort study, performed in women health private hospital between Sep. 2023-Sep. 2024. for 200 term pregnant women attending for elective cesarean section, 100 women undergoes spinal anesthesia and 100 women undergoes general anesthesia. Those women with any risk factor that affect study parameters as preterm baby or placenta previa were excluded from the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis shows non-significant difference in age and parity among the groups with no significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate after operation the mean volume of intraoperative blood loss and the mean decline in hemoglobin is higher in general anesthesia group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spinal anesthesia provides better outcome regarding lower intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, higher fetal Apgar score at 1st minutes, with similar haemodynamic stability. It is a better option for cesarean section anesthesia reducing morbidity and mortality from the increasingly performed operation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgian medical news\",\"volume\":\" 361\",\"pages\":\"185-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgian medical news\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,麻醉方式对母婴健康均有影响。多年来,全身麻醉一直是剖宫产术的一种选择,有许多并发症,特别是在紧急剖宫产术中,如脊髓麻醉,一种区域麻醉,在过去的二十年中已经被尝试,可以提供没有这些并发症的麻醉。方法:一项前瞻性随机队列研究,于2023年9月至2009年9月在私立妇女保健医院进行。2024. 在200名参加选择性剖宫产手术的足月孕妇中,100名妇女接受脊髓麻醉,100名妇女接受全身麻醉。那些有任何影响研究参数的风险因素如早产或前置胎盘的妇女被排除在研究之外。结果:数据分析显示两组患者年龄、胎次差异无统计学意义,术后收缩压、舒张压、脉搏率差异无统计学意义,术中平均出血量、平均血红蛋白下降量以全麻组较高。结论:脊髓麻醉的效果较好,术中出血量少,术后疼痛少,胎儿第1分钟Apgar评分较高,血流动力学稳定性相似。它是剖宫产麻醉的一个更好的选择,减少了越来越多的手术的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOME ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF ANESTHESIA DURING CAESAREAN SECTION.

Background: The rate of caesarean section has been increased globally all over the world and the type of anesthesia can affect both maternal and fetal health. For years the general anesthesia has been used as a method of choice during caesarean section with many complications especially in emergency caesarean section, were as spinal anesthesia, a type of regional anesthesia, that has been tried in the last two decades may provide anesthesia without these complication.

Methods: A prospective randomized cohort study, performed in women health private hospital between Sep. 2023-Sep. 2024. for 200 term pregnant women attending for elective cesarean section, 100 women undergoes spinal anesthesia and 100 women undergoes general anesthesia. Those women with any risk factor that affect study parameters as preterm baby or placenta previa were excluded from the study.

Results: Data analysis shows non-significant difference in age and parity among the groups with no significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate after operation the mean volume of intraoperative blood loss and the mean decline in hemoglobin is higher in general anesthesia group.

Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia provides better outcome regarding lower intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, higher fetal Apgar score at 1st minutes, with similar haemodynamic stability. It is a better option for cesarean section anesthesia reducing morbidity and mortality from the increasingly performed operation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信