Li Yu, Xuan Tang, Dandan Gong, Changfeng Man, Yu Fan
{"title":"普通人群中老年人的患病率和全因死亡风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Li Yu, Xuan Tang, Dandan Gong, Changfeng Man, Yu Fan","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Prefrailty represents an intermediate stage between robust health and frailty. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of prefrailty and evaluate its association with all-cause mortality in older adults from the general population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published through to December 10, 2024. Eligible studies reported either prefrailty prevalence or all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population aged 65 years and older.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis included 26 studies (25 articles; <i>N</i> = 222 473). The included studies utilized the Fried frailty phenotype and frailty index to define prefrailty. The pooled prefrailty prevalence was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–48%), with similar rates across assessment methods. Prefrailty significantly increased all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% CI 1.32–1.45). Sex-specific analyses showed a marginally higher risk in men (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.30–1.49) than in women (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.25–1.41). Mortality associations were stronger when prefrailty was defined by the frailty index (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.35–1.61) than by phenotype (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.32–1.42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Nearly half of older adults exhibit prefrailty, which confers a 38% increased mortality risk in older adults from the general population. These findings underscore the need for early identification and intervention in this high-risk subgroup. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 1167–1177</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 9","pages":"1167-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prefrailty prevalence and all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies\",\"authors\":\"Li Yu, Xuan Tang, Dandan Gong, Changfeng Man, Yu Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.70133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prefrailty represents an intermediate stage between robust health and frailty. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of prefrailty and evaluate its association with all-cause mortality in older adults from the general population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published through to December 10, 2024. Eligible studies reported either prefrailty prevalence or all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population aged 65 years and older.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The analysis included 26 studies (25 articles; <i>N</i> = 222 473). The included studies utilized the Fried frailty phenotype and frailty index to define prefrailty. The pooled prefrailty prevalence was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–48%), with similar rates across assessment methods. Prefrailty significantly increased all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% CI 1.32–1.45). Sex-specific analyses showed a marginally higher risk in men (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.30–1.49) than in women (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.25–1.41). Mortality associations were stronger when prefrailty was defined by the frailty index (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.35–1.61) than by phenotype (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.32–1.42).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nearly half of older adults exhibit prefrailty, which confers a 38% increased mortality risk in older adults from the general population. These findings underscore the need for early identification and intervention in this high-risk subgroup. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 1167–1177</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"1167-1177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.70133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.70133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:脆弱是介于健康和虚弱之间的一个中间阶段。本荟萃分析旨在估计全球患病率,并评估其与普通人群中老年人全因死亡率的关系。方法:两位独立审稿人系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase截至2024年12月10日发表的相关研究。符合条件的研究报告了65岁及以上普通人群中老年人的患病率或全因死亡率风险。结果:纳入26项研究(25篇;n = 222 473)。纳入的研究利用Fried脆弱表型和脆弱指数来定义易感性。合并患病率为45%(95%可信区间[CI] 42-48%),各种评估方法的患病率相似。偏好显著增加全因死亡风险(危险比[HR] 1.38;95% ci 1.32-1.45)。性别特异性分析显示,男性的风险略高(HR 1.39;95% CI 1.30-1.49)高于女性(HR 1.33;95% ci 1.25-1.41)。当脆弱性由虚弱指数定义时,死亡率相关性更强(HR 1.47;95% CI 1.35-1.61)比表型(HR 1.37;95% ci 1.32-1.42)。结论:近一半的老年人表现出易感性,这使得老年人的死亡风险比一般人群高38%。这些发现强调了对这一高危亚群进行早期识别和干预的必要性。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
Prefrailty prevalence and all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Aim
Prefrailty represents an intermediate stage between robust health and frailty. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of prefrailty and evaluate its association with all-cause mortality in older adults from the general population.
Methods
Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published through to December 10, 2024. Eligible studies reported either prefrailty prevalence or all-cause mortality risk in older adults from the general population aged 65 years and older.
Results
The analysis included 26 studies (25 articles; N = 222 473). The included studies utilized the Fried frailty phenotype and frailty index to define prefrailty. The pooled prefrailty prevalence was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–48%), with similar rates across assessment methods. Prefrailty significantly increased all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% CI 1.32–1.45). Sex-specific analyses showed a marginally higher risk in men (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.30–1.49) than in women (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.25–1.41). Mortality associations were stronger when prefrailty was defined by the frailty index (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.35–1.61) than by phenotype (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.32–1.42).
Conclusions
Nearly half of older adults exhibit prefrailty, which confers a 38% increased mortality risk in older adults from the general population. These findings underscore the need for early identification and intervention in this high-risk subgroup. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 1167–1177.
期刊介绍:
Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.