间充质基质细胞预防造血干细胞移植后移植物抗宿主病:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan
{"title":"间充质基质细胞预防造血干细胞移植后移植物抗宿主病:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:间充质基质细胞(MSCs)已成为预防接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)患者移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的潜在替代治疗策略。研究设计和方法:本荟萃分析包括8项随机对照试验(rct),涉及570例患者。评估的主要结果是总生存期(OS)、急性GVHD(aGVHD)和慢性GVHD(cGVHD)的发展。次要结局包括原发疾病复发和不良事件。使用Review Manager (RevMan 5.4)进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。结果:荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,MSC组的总生存率显著提高(RR 1.12;95% CI: 1.02-1.23),无异质性证据(I²= 0%)。MSC预防与aGVHD发生率显著降低相关(RR 0.67;95% CI:0.40-0.83, I²= 33%)和cGVHD (RR 0.65;95% ci: 0.49-0.87, i²= 0%)。然而,MSC组与对照组在原发疾病复发方面无显著差异(RR 1.00;95% CI:0.73-1.38, I²= 0%)或感染发生率(RR 0.80;95% ci:0.57-1.11, i²= 0%)。在至少有一项不良事件的患者方面,两组间无统计学差异(RR 1.10;95% ci: 0.74-1.63, i²= 34%)。结论:MSC预防显著提高了hsct患者的总生存率,降低了aGVHD和cGVHD的发生率,而不增加复发、感染或不良事件的风险,表明其作为一种安全有效的GVHD治疗干预措施的潜力。需要进一步的大规模、多中心的随机对照试验来验证或反驳目前的发现。注册:本综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Research design and methods: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.

Results: The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).

Conclusions: MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.

Registration: This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信