Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan
{"title":"间充质基质细胞预防造血干细胞移植后移植物抗宿主病:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sushmitha Rameshbabu, Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan, Mudit Moondra, Seema Nabil Nimer, Roshan Afshan, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Raef Nizar Ali, Anuj Timshina, Shiny Teja Kolli, Muhammad Ayyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2535422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
Research design and methods: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD(aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model.
Results: The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI:0.73-1.38) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI:0.57-1.11). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63).
Conclusions: MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate or refute the current findings.
Registration: This review has been registered with theInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024569358).
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.