经皮椎体成形术联合经皮椎体成形术的生物力学评价:有限元分析。

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1606709
Xu Zhou, Shenghua Qin, Chunhai Huang, Feiwen Li, Jin Liu, Ti Wu, Mingzheng Zhang
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术联合经皮椎体成形术的生物力学评价:有限元分析。","authors":"Xu Zhou, Shenghua Qin, Chunhai Huang, Feiwen Li, Jin Liu, Ti Wu, Mingzheng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1606709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the introduction of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD), numerous studies have confirmed its clinical efficacy in elderly patients. However, PCD is also associated with risks such as bone cement leakage and vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to present a biomechanical evaluation of two modified versions of PCD performed in combination with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a CT scan of a healthy male's lumbosacral region were used to establish finite element (FE) models of nonsurgical treatment, PCD, L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP (modified technique 1, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space does not connect with the L4 and L5 vertebrae) and PCIF (modified technique 2, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space connects with the L4 and L5 vertebrae). A compressive of preload 150 N and a moment of 10 N·m were applied to recreate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) of L3/4 and L4/5, maximum stress on the L3 inferior endplate, L4 inferior endplate and L5 superior endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus of L4/5, and displacement of the bone cement were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both modified techniques outperformed the simple PCD technique in reducing stress on the endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus, and displacement of the bone cement. The L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP technique was more advantageous in terms of reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. The addition of the PVP technique significantly enhanced spinal stability by increasing support to adjacent vertebrae, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative endplate fractures and bone cement leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified PCD combined with PVP may be a safer and more effective option for treating degenerative disc diseases, providing important references for clinical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1606709"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous cement discoplasty combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Zhou, Shenghua Qin, Chunhai Huang, Feiwen Li, Jin Liu, Ti Wu, Mingzheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1606709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since the introduction of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD), numerous studies have confirmed its clinical efficacy in elderly patients. However, PCD is also associated with risks such as bone cement leakage and vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to present a biomechanical evaluation of two modified versions of PCD performed in combination with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a CT scan of a healthy male's lumbosacral region were used to establish finite element (FE) models of nonsurgical treatment, PCD, L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP (modified technique 1, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space does not connect with the L4 and L5 vertebrae) and PCIF (modified technique 2, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space connects with the L4 and L5 vertebrae). A compressive of preload 150 N and a moment of 10 N·m were applied to recreate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) of L3/4 and L4/5, maximum stress on the L3 inferior endplate, L4 inferior endplate and L5 superior endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus of L4/5, and displacement of the bone cement were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both modified techniques outperformed the simple PCD technique in reducing stress on the endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus, and displacement of the bone cement. The L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP technique was more advantageous in terms of reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. The addition of the PVP technique significantly enhanced spinal stability by increasing support to adjacent vertebrae, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative endplate fractures and bone cement leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified PCD combined with PVP may be a safer and more effective option for treating degenerative disc diseases, providing important references for clinical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1606709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1606709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1606709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:自引入经皮骨水泥椎间盘成形术(PCD)以来,大量研究证实了其在老年患者中的临床疗效。然而,PCD也与骨水泥渗漏和椎体骨折等风险相关。本研究的目的是对两种改良版本的PCD联合经皮椎体成形术(PVP)进行生物力学评价。方法:利用健康男性腰骶区CT扫描数据,建立非手术治疗、PCD、L4/ 5pcd + L4L5PVP(改良技术1,L4/5椎间盘间隙骨水泥不与L4和L5椎体连接)和PCIF(改良技术2,L4/5椎间盘间隙骨水泥与L4和L5椎体连接)的有限元模型。施加150 N的预紧力和10 N·m的力矩来重建弯曲、延伸、侧向弯曲和轴向旋转。评估L3/4和L4/5的活动范围(ROM)、L3下终板、L4下终板和L5上终板的最大应力、L4/5纤维环的应力和骨水泥的位移。结果:两种改良技术在减少终板应力、纤维环应力和骨水泥位移方面均优于简单的PCD技术。L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP技术在减少术后并发症发生率方面更具优势。PVP技术的加入通过增加对相邻椎体的支持显著增强了脊柱稳定性,从而降低了术后终板骨折和骨水泥泄漏的风险。结论:改良PCD联合PVP治疗退行性椎间盘疾病可能是一种更安全、更有效的选择,为临床治疗提供重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous cement discoplasty combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a finite element analysis.

Introduction: Since the introduction of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD), numerous studies have confirmed its clinical efficacy in elderly patients. However, PCD is also associated with risks such as bone cement leakage and vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to present a biomechanical evaluation of two modified versions of PCD performed in combination with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).

Methods: Data from a CT scan of a healthy male's lumbosacral region were used to establish finite element (FE) models of nonsurgical treatment, PCD, L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP (modified technique 1, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space does not connect with the L4 and L5 vertebrae) and PCIF (modified technique 2, where the bone cement in the L4/5 disc space connects with the L4 and L5 vertebrae). A compressive of preload 150 N and a moment of 10 N·m were applied to recreate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) of L3/4 and L4/5, maximum stress on the L3 inferior endplate, L4 inferior endplate and L5 superior endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus of L4/5, and displacement of the bone cement were evaluated.

Results: Both modified techniques outperformed the simple PCD technique in reducing stress on the endplate, stress on the annulus fibrosus, and displacement of the bone cement. The L4/5PCD + L4L5PVP technique was more advantageous in terms of reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. The addition of the PVP technique significantly enhanced spinal stability by increasing support to adjacent vertebrae, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative endplate fractures and bone cement leakage.

Conclusion: Modified PCD combined with PVP may be a safer and more effective option for treating degenerative disc diseases, providing important references for clinical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信