了解门静脉高压症的临床意义:深入了解门静脉高压症的发病机制、诊断和治疗。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0980
Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman
{"title":"了解门静脉高压症的临床意义:深入了解门静脉高压症的发病机制、诊断和治疗。","authors":"Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) represents one of the strongest predictive biomarkers for disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Chronic liver injury triggers both intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms, giving rise to an increasing portal pressure and a self-perpetuating cycle with worsening risks of liver-related complications and mortality. Diagnosing CSPH becomes challenging in patients with advanced but compensated chronic liver disease where CSPH is not apparent clinically. Approximately 60% of patients with cACLD will have CSPH, representing a critical window for intervention to reduce portal pressure and prevent complications. The current gold standard for portal pressure measurement, the hepatic venous pressure gradient, is impractical for widespread use. Emerging diagnostic tools aim to address this limitation. Techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and noninvasive approaches using imaging methods, elastography (targeting liver and/or spleen) and serum markers, offer alternatives for CSPH detection, and moreover, can guide treatment decisions. Non-selective beta-blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with CSPH. Unfortunately, they remain the only approved therapy for CSPH and they are not effective in reducing portal pressure in all patients, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic options as well as practical methods to evaluate treatment response. Recent innovations and ongoing research are steering the field toward a more personalized approach, where diagnosis, treatment and follow up are tailored to individual patient risk profiles. This evolution holds the potential to improve outcomes in patients with CSPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 4","pages":"380-391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Vanderschueren, Schalk van der Merwe, Wim Laleman\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2025.0980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) represents one of the strongest predictive biomarkers for disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Chronic liver injury triggers both intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms, giving rise to an increasing portal pressure and a self-perpetuating cycle with worsening risks of liver-related complications and mortality. Diagnosing CSPH becomes challenging in patients with advanced but compensated chronic liver disease where CSPH is not apparent clinically. Approximately 60% of patients with cACLD will have CSPH, representing a critical window for intervention to reduce portal pressure and prevent complications. The current gold standard for portal pressure measurement, the hepatic venous pressure gradient, is impractical for widespread use. Emerging diagnostic tools aim to address this limitation. Techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and noninvasive approaches using imaging methods, elastography (targeting liver and/or spleen) and serum markers, offer alternatives for CSPH detection, and moreover, can guide treatment decisions. Non-selective beta-blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with CSPH. Unfortunately, they remain the only approved therapy for CSPH and they are not effective in reducing portal pressure in all patients, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic options as well as practical methods to evaluate treatment response. Recent innovations and ongoing research are steering the field toward a more personalized approach, where diagnosis, treatment and follow up are tailored to individual patient risk profiles. This evolution holds the potential to improve outcomes in patients with CSPH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"380-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床显著门脉高压(CSPH)的发展是代偿性晚期慢性肝病(cACLD)患者疾病进展的最强预测生物标志物之一。慢性肝损伤触发肝内和肝外机制,引起门静脉压力增加和自我延续的循环,并增加肝脏相关并发症和死亡的风险。在晚期代偿性慢性肝病患者中诊断CSPH具有挑战性,其中CSPH临床表现不明显。大约60%的cACLD患者会出现CSPH,这是减少门静脉压力和预防并发症的关键干预窗口。目前门静脉压力测量的金标准,肝静脉压力梯度,是不切实际的广泛使用。新兴的诊断工具旨在解决这一限制。超声内镜引导门静脉压力梯度测量、无创成像方法、弹性成像(针对肝脏和/或脾脏)和血清标记物等技术为CSPH检测提供了替代方法,而且可以指导治疗决策。已知非选择性β受体阻滞剂可降低CSPH患者的发病率和死亡率。不幸的是,它们仍然是唯一被批准的治疗CSPH的方法,它们并不能有效地降低所有患者的门静脉压力,这突出了迫切需要额外的治疗选择以及评估治疗反应的实用方法。最近的创新和正在进行的研究正在引导该领域朝着更加个性化的方法发展,在这种方法中,诊断、治疗和随访都是针对个体患者的风险概况量身定制的。这种进化具有改善CSPH患者预后的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Understanding clinically significant portal hypertension: an in-depth look at pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) represents one of the strongest predictive biomarkers for disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Chronic liver injury triggers both intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms, giving rise to an increasing portal pressure and a self-perpetuating cycle with worsening risks of liver-related complications and mortality. Diagnosing CSPH becomes challenging in patients with advanced but compensated chronic liver disease where CSPH is not apparent clinically. Approximately 60% of patients with cACLD will have CSPH, representing a critical window for intervention to reduce portal pressure and prevent complications. The current gold standard for portal pressure measurement, the hepatic venous pressure gradient, is impractical for widespread use. Emerging diagnostic tools aim to address this limitation. Techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and noninvasive approaches using imaging methods, elastography (targeting liver and/or spleen) and serum markers, offer alternatives for CSPH detection, and moreover, can guide treatment decisions. Non-selective beta-blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with CSPH. Unfortunately, they remain the only approved therapy for CSPH and they are not effective in reducing portal pressure in all patients, highlighting the urgent need for additional therapeutic options as well as practical methods to evaluate treatment response. Recent innovations and ongoing research are steering the field toward a more personalized approach, where diagnosis, treatment and follow up are tailored to individual patient risk profiles. This evolution holds the potential to improve outcomes in patients with CSPH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信