反复远程缺血预处理改善皮肤微血管对闭塞后反应性充血反应的时间特征。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Jahyun Kim, Warren D Franke, James A Lang
{"title":"反复远程缺血预处理改善皮肤微血管对闭塞后反应性充血反应的时间特征。","authors":"Jahyun Kim, Warren D Franke, James A Lang","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves endothelial-dependent cutaneous vasodilation. However, the role of repeated RIPC on the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) response in the cutaneous microvasculature is unknown; here, we assessed whether repeated RIPC would increase PORH responses. Thirty participants (23 ± 3 yr old) performed either repeated RIPC (1 session/day for a week, <i>n</i> = 10 or 12 sessions over 2 wk, <i>n</i> = 12) or 2-wk control (<i>n</i> = 8). Each RIPC session comprised 4 repetitions of 5-min arm blood flow occlusion interspersed by 5-min reperfusion. PORH was elicited by brachial artery occlusion for 5 min. Cutaneous vascular conductance was determined using laser speckle contrast imaging before and after the repeated RIPC. The control group did not receive RIPC but underwent the PORH measurements 2 wk later. Area under the curve and peak of PORH were not different. Max/Time to Peak, the maximum hyperemia achieved (Max) over the rate of reperfusion following arterial occlusion (Tp), improved similarly after both 1 and 2 wk of repeated RIPC (1 wk: 0.09 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07, 2 wk: 0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 CVC/s, Pre vs. Post, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Tp improved only after 2 wk of RIPC (Tp: 16.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.8 ± 2.4 s, Pre vs. Post, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The control group responses did not change after 2 wk. Repeated RIPC did not increase the magnitude of the hyperemic response but did alter temporal measures of PORH such as Max/Tp and Tp following cuff deflation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study investigated the extent to which <i>1</i>) repeated RIPC improved PORH-induced cutaneous microvascular reactivity and <i>2</i>) a longer period of RIPC further improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity. Both 1 and 2 wk of RIPC improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity similarly. However, only 2 wk of RIPC altered temporal PORH variables. These results suggest that repeated RIPC increases cutaneous microvascular reactivity following occlusion, but longer duration RIPC may be needed to alter temporal cutaneous microvascular reactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R363-R370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning improves temporal characteristics of the cutaneous microvascular responses to postocclusive reactive hyperemia.\",\"authors\":\"Jahyun Kim, Warren D Franke, James A Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves endothelial-dependent cutaneous vasodilation. However, the role of repeated RIPC on the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) response in the cutaneous microvasculature is unknown; here, we assessed whether repeated RIPC would increase PORH responses. Thirty participants (23 ± 3 yr old) performed either repeated RIPC (1 session/day for a week, <i>n</i> = 10 or 12 sessions over 2 wk, <i>n</i> = 12) or 2-wk control (<i>n</i> = 8). Each RIPC session comprised 4 repetitions of 5-min arm blood flow occlusion interspersed by 5-min reperfusion. PORH was elicited by brachial artery occlusion for 5 min. Cutaneous vascular conductance was determined using laser speckle contrast imaging before and after the repeated RIPC. The control group did not receive RIPC but underwent the PORH measurements 2 wk later. Area under the curve and peak of PORH were not different. Max/Time to Peak, the maximum hyperemia achieved (Max) over the rate of reperfusion following arterial occlusion (Tp), improved similarly after both 1 and 2 wk of repeated RIPC (1 wk: 0.09 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07, 2 wk: 0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 CVC/s, Pre vs. Post, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Tp improved only after 2 wk of RIPC (Tp: 16.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.8 ± 2.4 s, Pre vs. Post, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The control group responses did not change after 2 wk. Repeated RIPC did not increase the magnitude of the hyperemic response but did alter temporal measures of PORH such as Max/Tp and Tp following cuff deflation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study investigated the extent to which <i>1</i>) repeated RIPC improved PORH-induced cutaneous microvascular reactivity and <i>2</i>) a longer period of RIPC further improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity. Both 1 and 2 wk of RIPC improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity similarly. However, only 2 wk of RIPC altered temporal PORH variables. These results suggest that repeated RIPC increases cutaneous microvascular reactivity following occlusion, but longer duration RIPC may be needed to alter temporal cutaneous microvascular reactivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"R363-R370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重复远程缺血预处理(RIPC)改善内皮依赖性皮肤血管舒张。然而,重复RIPC在皮肤微血管闭塞后反应性充血(PORH)反应中的作用尚不清楚;在这里,我们评估了重复的RIPC是否会增加PORH反应。方法:30名参与者(23±3岁)进行重复RIPC(1次/天,持续一周,n=10;或在2周内进行12次训练,n=12)或2周的对照组(n=8)。每次RIPC包括4次重复,5分钟手臂血流阻断,穿插5分钟再灌注。阻断肱动脉5分钟,诱发肺动脉高压。采用激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)测定反复RIPC前后的皮肤血管导度。对照组不接受RIPC治疗,但两周后进行了PORH测量。结果:曲线下面积和波峰无明显差异。Max/Time to Peak,动脉闭塞(Tp)后获得的最大充血(Max)超过再灌注率,在1周和2周重复RIPC后同样得到改善(1周:0.09±0.04 vs. 0.12±0.07,2周:0.12±0.03 vs. 0.14±0.04 CVC·s-1, Pre vs. Post, p)。结论:重复RIPC没有增加充血反应的程度,但确实改变了袖带收缩后PORH的时间测量,如Max/Tp和T/p。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning improves temporal characteristics of the cutaneous microvascular responses to postocclusive reactive hyperemia.

Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves endothelial-dependent cutaneous vasodilation. However, the role of repeated RIPC on the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) response in the cutaneous microvasculature is unknown; here, we assessed whether repeated RIPC would increase PORH responses. Thirty participants (23 ± 3 yr old) performed either repeated RIPC (1 session/day for a week, n = 10 or 12 sessions over 2 wk, n = 12) or 2-wk control (n = 8). Each RIPC session comprised 4 repetitions of 5-min arm blood flow occlusion interspersed by 5-min reperfusion. PORH was elicited by brachial artery occlusion for 5 min. Cutaneous vascular conductance was determined using laser speckle contrast imaging before and after the repeated RIPC. The control group did not receive RIPC but underwent the PORH measurements 2 wk later. Area under the curve and peak of PORH were not different. Max/Time to Peak, the maximum hyperemia achieved (Max) over the rate of reperfusion following arterial occlusion (Tp), improved similarly after both 1 and 2 wk of repeated RIPC (1 wk: 0.09 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07, 2 wk: 0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 CVC/s, Pre vs. Post, P < 0.05). Tp improved only after 2 wk of RIPC (Tp: 16.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.8 ± 2.4 s, Pre vs. Post, P < 0.05). The control group responses did not change after 2 wk. Repeated RIPC did not increase the magnitude of the hyperemic response but did alter temporal measures of PORH such as Max/Tp and Tp following cuff deflation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study investigated the extent to which 1) repeated RIPC improved PORH-induced cutaneous microvascular reactivity and 2) a longer period of RIPC further improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity. Both 1 and 2 wk of RIPC improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity similarly. However, only 2 wk of RIPC altered temporal PORH variables. These results suggest that repeated RIPC increases cutaneous microvascular reactivity following occlusion, but longer duration RIPC may be needed to alter temporal cutaneous microvascular reactivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信