冠状动脉疾病患者运动认知危险综合征基于nomogram预测模型:一项横断面研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yiyi Chai, Qingfang Ye, Xiaomin Wu, Yanrong Gu, Zheng Zhang, Dou Zhu, Yini Wang, Ping Lin, Ling Li
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病患者运动认知危险综合征基于nomogram预测模型:一项横断面研究","authors":"Yiyi Chai,&nbsp;Qingfang Ye,&nbsp;Xiaomin Wu,&nbsp;Yanrong Gu,&nbsp;Zheng Zhang,&nbsp;Dou Zhu,&nbsp;Yini Wang,&nbsp;Ping Lin,&nbsp;Ling Li","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03132-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is well known to be associated with dementia, motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) has been identified as a predictor of dementia, with MCR and CAD potentially sharing common pathophysiological mechanisms. Identifying MCR in CAD patients is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. This study aims to investigate the incidence and identify the risk factors of MCR in CAD patients, and further establish a visual risk prediction model. </p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study. From September 2023 to December 2023, we enrolled 413 CAD patients for this study. Patients were randomly grouped into a training cohort (80%) and a validation cohort (20%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select variables and develop a prediction model in the training cohort. In both the training and validation cohorts: ROC curve was used to evaluate the differentiation of the nomogram model; the calibration curve was used to evaluate the consistency of the model; the decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study, the prevalence of MCR was 13.8%. Four risk predictors, namely polypharmacy, handgrip strength, Gensini score, and neutrophil counts, were screened and used to develop a nomogram model. The ROC curve of the training set was 0.781 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.86). Similar ROC curve was achieved at validation set 0.780 (95%CI: 0.62, 0.94). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the training, and testing cohorts were p = 0.993, and p = 0.782, calibration curve analysis demonstrated that the model was well-calibrated. DCA exhibited this model with clinical utility.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We developed a nomogram that could help clinicians identify high-risk groups of MCR in middle-aged and elderly CAD patients for early intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Yiyi Chai,&nbsp;Qingfang Ye,&nbsp;Xiaomin Wu,&nbsp;Yanrong Gu,&nbsp;Zheng Zhang,&nbsp;Dou Zhu,&nbsp;Yini Wang,&nbsp;Ping Lin,&nbsp;Ling Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03132-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is well known to be associated with dementia, motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) has been identified as a predictor of dementia, with MCR and CAD potentially sharing common pathophysiological mechanisms. Identifying MCR in CAD patients is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. This study aims to investigate the incidence and identify the risk factors of MCR in CAD patients, and further establish a visual risk prediction model. </p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study. From September 2023 to December 2023, we enrolled 413 CAD patients for this study. Patients were randomly grouped into a training cohort (80%) and a validation cohort (20%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select variables and develop a prediction model in the training cohort. In both the training and validation cohorts: ROC curve was used to evaluate the differentiation of the nomogram model; the calibration curve was used to evaluate the consistency of the model; the decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study, the prevalence of MCR was 13.8%. Four risk predictors, namely polypharmacy, handgrip strength, Gensini score, and neutrophil counts, were screened and used to develop a nomogram model. The ROC curve of the training set was 0.781 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.86). Similar ROC curve was achieved at validation set 0.780 (95%CI: 0.62, 0.94). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the training, and testing cohorts were p = 0.993, and p = 0.782, calibration curve analysis demonstrated that the model was well-calibrated. DCA exhibited this model with clinical utility.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We developed a nomogram that could help clinicians identify high-risk groups of MCR in middle-aged and elderly CAD patients for early intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03132-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03132-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)众所周知与痴呆相关,运动认知风险综合征(MCR)已被确定为痴呆的预测因子,MCR和CAD可能具有共同的病理生理机制。识别CAD患者的MCR有助于预防痴呆。本研究旨在调查CAD患者MCR的发生率,识别MCR的危险因素,并进一步建立视觉风险预测模型。方法:横断面研究。从2023年9月到2023年12月,我们入组了413例CAD患者。患者随机分为训练组(80%)和验证组(20%)。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归模型和多元logistic回归分析对培训队列进行变量选择,建立预测模型。在训练组和验证组中:采用ROC曲线评价nomogram模型的分化程度;用标定曲线评价模型的一致性;采用决策曲线分析来评价nomogram的有效性。结果:本组MCR患病率为13.8%。筛选四种风险预测因子,即多药、握力、Gensini评分和中性粒细胞计数,并用于建立nomogram模型。训练集的ROC曲线为0.781 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.86)。在验证集0.780处获得相似的ROC曲线(95%CI: 0.62, 0.94)。训练组的Hosmer-Lemeshow检验p = 0.993,检验队列p = 0.782,校正曲线分析表明模型校正良好。DCA显示了该模型的临床应用价值。结论:我们开发了一种nomogram,可以帮助临床医生识别中老年CAD患者MCR的高危人群,进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study

A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study

A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study

A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is well known to be associated with dementia, motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) has been identified as a predictor of dementia, with MCR and CAD potentially sharing common pathophysiological mechanisms. Identifying MCR in CAD patients is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. This study aims to investigate the incidence and identify the risk factors of MCR in CAD patients, and further establish a visual risk prediction model.

Methods

A cross-sectional study. From September 2023 to December 2023, we enrolled 413 CAD patients for this study. Patients were randomly grouped into a training cohort (80%) and a validation cohort (20%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select variables and develop a prediction model in the training cohort. In both the training and validation cohorts: ROC curve was used to evaluate the differentiation of the nomogram model; the calibration curve was used to evaluate the consistency of the model; the decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram.

Results

In this study, the prevalence of MCR was 13.8%. Four risk predictors, namely polypharmacy, handgrip strength, Gensini score, and neutrophil counts, were screened and used to develop a nomogram model. The ROC curve of the training set was 0.781 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.86). Similar ROC curve was achieved at validation set 0.780 (95%CI: 0.62, 0.94). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test in the training, and testing cohorts were p = 0.993, and p = 0.782, calibration curve analysis demonstrated that the model was well-calibrated. DCA exhibited this model with clinical utility.

Conclusion

We developed a nomogram that could help clinicians identify high-risk groups of MCR in middle-aged and elderly CAD patients for early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信