{"title":"含雷默昔单抗化疗对铂基化疗难治/不耐受的胃肠道神经内分泌癌患者的治疗:一项多中心观察性回顾性研究(WJOG13420G)","authors":"Yuki Matsubara, Toshiki Masuishi, Waki Hosoda, Hidekazu Hirano, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Kenta Kawasaki, Takeshi Kawakami, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, Takaya Shimura, Masato Komoda, Kozue Murayama, Keiko Minashi, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yudai Shinohara, Shinichi Nishina, Nobuyuki Musha, Kyoko Kato, Kentaro Kawakami, Katsunori Shinozaki, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Takayuki Ando, Yosuke Kito, Akitaka Makiyama, Seiichiro Mitani, Kaori Hino, Naoki Izawa, Isao Oze, Kei Muro","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No standard second-line chemotherapy has been established for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study aimed to determine whether ramucirumab (RAM) is a treatment candidate in this setting. We retrospectively collected data from patients with gastric and colorectal NEC who received second-line chemotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy. The pathological diagnosis of NEC was confirmed centrally according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. We compared the clinical outcomes between second- or later-line chemotherapy in the RAM group and second-line chemotherapy in the non-RAM group. One-hundred patients diagnosed with NEC by central pathological review were studied. The RAM and non-RAM groups included 44 (gastric/colorectal cancer, 34/10) and 56 (37/19) patients, respectively. In the RAM group, 68% of patients received RAM as second-line chemotherapy. RAM was most frequently combined with weekly paclitaxel for gastric NEC and FOLFIRI for colorectal NEC. The RAM group showed better trends in overall survival and progression-free survival than the non-RAM group, with a median of 9.0 versus 5.6 months and 4.3 versus 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28] and 0.45 [0.27-0.75]). Efficacy was more pronounced in gastric NEC (PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56) compared to colorectal NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the RAM group (44%) than in the non-RAM group (6%), with notably higher responses observed in patients receiving paclitaxel plus RAM (62%). This study suggested that RAM-containing chemotherapy, especially paclitaxel plus RAM for gastric NEC, seems promising and should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory/intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter observational retrospective study (WJOG13420G).\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Matsubara, Toshiki Masuishi, Waki Hosoda, Hidekazu Hirano, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Kenta Kawasaki, Takeshi Kawakami, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, Takaya Shimura, Masato Komoda, Kozue Murayama, Keiko Minashi, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yudai Shinohara, Shinichi Nishina, Nobuyuki Musha, Kyoko Kato, Kentaro Kawakami, Katsunori Shinozaki, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Takayuki Ando, Yosuke Kito, Akitaka Makiyama, Seiichiro Mitani, Kaori Hino, Naoki Izawa, Isao Oze, Kei Muro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>No standard second-line chemotherapy has been established for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study aimed to determine whether ramucirumab (RAM) is a treatment candidate in this setting. We retrospectively collected data from patients with gastric and colorectal NEC who received second-line chemotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy. The pathological diagnosis of NEC was confirmed centrally according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. We compared the clinical outcomes between second- or later-line chemotherapy in the RAM group and second-line chemotherapy in the non-RAM group. One-hundred patients diagnosed with NEC by central pathological review were studied. The RAM and non-RAM groups included 44 (gastric/colorectal cancer, 34/10) and 56 (37/19) patients, respectively. In the RAM group, 68% of patients received RAM as second-line chemotherapy. RAM was most frequently combined with weekly paclitaxel for gastric NEC and FOLFIRI for colorectal NEC. The RAM group showed better trends in overall survival and progression-free survival than the non-RAM group, with a median of 9.0 versus 5.6 months and 4.3 versus 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28] and 0.45 [0.27-0.75]). Efficacy was more pronounced in gastric NEC (PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56) compared to colorectal NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the RAM group (44%) than in the non-RAM group (6%), with notably higher responses observed in patients receiving paclitaxel plus RAM (62%). This study suggested that RAM-containing chemotherapy, especially paclitaxel plus RAM for gastric NEC, seems promising and should be further investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胃肠神经内分泌癌(NEC)尚未建立标准的二线化疗方案。本研究旨在确定ramucirumab (RAM)是否是这种情况下的治疗候选药物。我们回顾性收集了胃和结直肠NEC患者在铂基化疗后接受二线化疗的数据。根据世界卫生组织2019年分类,集中确诊NEC病理诊断。我们比较了RAM组的二线或后期化疗与非RAM组的二线化疗的临床结果。对100例经中央病理检查诊断为NEC的患者进行了研究。RAM组和非RAM组分别包括44例(胃癌/结直肠癌,34/10)和56例(37/19)患者。在RAM组中,68%的患者接受RAM作为二线化疗。RAM最常联合每周紫杉醇治疗胃NEC,联合FOLFIRI治疗结直肠NEC。与非RAM组相比,RAM组在总生存期和无进展生存期方面表现出更好的趋势,中位数分别为9.0个月对5.6个月和4.3个月对1.8个月(风险比[HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28]和0.45[0.27-0.75])。与结直肠NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47)相比,胃NEC的疗效更为显著(PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56)。RAM组的客观缓解率(44%)明显高于非RAM组(6%),而接受紫杉醇加RAM的患者的客观缓解率(62%)明显更高。本研究提示,含RAM的化疗,特别是紫杉醇加RAM治疗胃NEC似乎很有希望,值得进一步研究。
Ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma refractory/intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter observational retrospective study (WJOG13420G).
No standard second-line chemotherapy has been established for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). This study aimed to determine whether ramucirumab (RAM) is a treatment candidate in this setting. We retrospectively collected data from patients with gastric and colorectal NEC who received second-line chemotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy. The pathological diagnosis of NEC was confirmed centrally according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. We compared the clinical outcomes between second- or later-line chemotherapy in the RAM group and second-line chemotherapy in the non-RAM group. One-hundred patients diagnosed with NEC by central pathological review were studied. The RAM and non-RAM groups included 44 (gastric/colorectal cancer, 34/10) and 56 (37/19) patients, respectively. In the RAM group, 68% of patients received RAM as second-line chemotherapy. RAM was most frequently combined with weekly paclitaxel for gastric NEC and FOLFIRI for colorectal NEC. The RAM group showed better trends in overall survival and progression-free survival than the non-RAM group, with a median of 9.0 versus 5.6 months and 4.3 versus 1.8 months, respectively (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.45-1.28] and 0.45 [0.27-0.75]). Efficacy was more pronounced in gastric NEC (PFS HR: 0.32, OS HR: 0.56) compared to colorectal NEC (PFS HR: 0.82, OS HR: 1.47). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the RAM group (44%) than in the non-RAM group (6%), with notably higher responses observed in patients receiving paclitaxel plus RAM (62%). This study suggested that RAM-containing chemotherapy, especially paclitaxel plus RAM for gastric NEC, seems promising and should be further investigated.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention